DWU2 wrote:
Intelligent Auto, or its equivalent from various camera makers will do its best to give a well-exposed shot, but I think, for the most part, if you tell the P&S camera you're taking beach/snow photos, macro, sports, backlit, portrait, etc. by turning the little dial, the camera will be more likely to render a well-exposed (and, to an extent, composed) picture for the casual shooter. That's why its there.
You are absolutely correct. Any human input, for the most part, should improve the shots. I've believed that for the 60 years I've played with cameras.
Trouble is, lately, I've been playing with the automatic stuff in both cameras and post processing. I keep getting jolted with how good it really is. It totally goes against my grain and the grain of forums like this one.
My wife was suggesting that I'm so fussy with my gear it was getting in the way of results. As a near joke, she gave me an Olympus "Tought" TG-5 (about $150 above the OP's budget.) As a return joke, I put it on iA and have left it there. "This will never work!", I told her. The damn thing with its too tiny sensor keeps getting photos I would have lost due to fussing with settings, lenses, finding my camera bag and other distractions.