Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Disappointing Lunar Shots
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Jan 23, 2019 18:32:17   #
hpucker99 Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
bwana wrote:
I was shooting 600 mm, f/4 @ ISO 200 for the full Moon shots. 1/400 sec. exposure pre-eclipse. 1/5-1 sec. exposures at totality.

Sony RX10 IV (w/ flip screen liveview), tripod mounted, Manual mode, autofocus throughout.

Other than cloud before and after totality and, at best thin cloud for the remainder, not a bad night!

A couple of shots below:

bwa


bwana, I also used a RX10 IV with results not as good as yours. One problem I had was that when I adjusted the camera to center the Moon, I sometimes adjusted the zoom. Is there a way to lock the zoom?

Reply
Jan 23, 2019 18:37:37   #
hpucker99 Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
PHRubin wrote:
If I had known in advance that:
1) The overcast would clear in time (it was heavy at supper time)
2) That the moon would be almost straight up

I might have been prepared. But...


Last week, I had got some information from timeanddate.com for viewing elevations. It gave me a maximum elevation of 61 degrees (or I misread it). No problem I thought, until that night my phone app said it would be overhead. Lucky my tripods worked but I wasn't ready for crawling on the ground attempting to adjust the camera in 5 degree temps.

Reply
Jan 24, 2019 21:43:27   #
Darren01 Loc: Fallbrook California
 
any movement will give/cause shake, is the tripod carbon or aluminum? Carbon is great for travel. It's light but it also moves in the breeze easily. Was it in any way windy? A slight gust will throw everything off also! All I had was clouds. My gimble head goes on the old tank. Bogen/Manfrotto 3011n.

A drunk cousin doesnt help much either!! LOL

Reply
 
 
Jan 25, 2019 04:21:20   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
foxfirerodandgun wrote:
We were blessed with clear skies, after a section of thin clouds passed by around 9:30 pm, but it was very cold & windy. However, with the exception of a couple decent shots of the moon before the eclipse began, all of my eclipse shots were very disappointing.

I started manual at ISO 100 - f/11 - 1/250 - focus @ infinity - spot metering - tripod mounted - cable release - live view - VR off, and from there during the eclipse went to ISO 200 & back to 100, from f/5.6 to f/16, from 1/80 to 1/500. With the exception of the pre-eclipse shots, nothing seemed to be anywhere close to being in sharp focus. I was somewhat hobbled because I only had a pan head and not a ball head, which as the moon rose and shifted in the sky, caused me to continually adjust the angle of the tripod/lens until I was actually on my knees in order to see the live view screen.

I suspect that I needed a much better lens than the Nikon 18-300mm - f/3.5-5.6 DX that I was using. Oh well, maybe next time I'll have a better lens and tripod setup, if I am still living. I look forward to seeing other Hoggers efforts.
We were blessed with clear skies, after a section ... (show quote)


My view of the Eclipse in the UK, was clouded-out. I took this shot 24 hours later with my Infra-Red converted Nikon.


(Download)

Reply
Jan 25, 2019 04:59:54   #
blackest Loc: Ireland
 
TriX wrote:
if your camera doesn’t have a tilt flip screen or you want a larger image, consider shooting tethered to either a laptop or a tablet (or a smart phone).


This would have been a good application for a field monitor, unfortunately for me the blood moon was right in the middle of when I had to sleep. A good viewing angle and the ability to see the exposure, metering will be trying to expose the sky to mid gray. My rear screen flips out but is limited to 90 degrees to the body. I would still have been limited to 300mm for my longest lens...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.