AGeza wrote:
Thanks everyone for the much needed help. Reading your advices (and considering my budget) I bought the RX100. I am going to my trip with my HX80 (for outside) and the RX100 for claudy weather and inside. I made a note for myself looking at ZS60 and ZS70 next time.
Now I wonder about the best SD cards I should have for this two cameras. I am going to open a post with that question. Thanks again for the advices. Seems to be in a good company.
That's a very interesting travel-camera combination.
Thank you for letting us know what your decision is, as we don't always get feedback from inquirers.
AGeza wrote:
Thanks everyone for the much needed help. Reading your advices (and considering my budget) I bought the RX100. I am going to my trip with my HX80 (for outside) and the RX100 for claudy weather and inside. I made a note for myself looking at ZS60 and ZS70 next time.
Now I wonder about the best SD cards I should have for this two cameras. I am going to open a post with that question. Thanks again for the advices. Seems to be in a good company.
SD cards are inexpensive today, compared to a decade ago. SanDisk would be my first choice.
I have the Panasonic lumix zs100 which I love. It has a one inch sensor and a good zoom and takes very sharp pictures. You can also get it very reasonably because they have recently introduced the ZS 200
le boecere wrote:
Needs BIG jean pockets.
Not at all. It’s a smallish point and shoot. Recommend by several sites as a great travel camera
Joburg wrote:
Not at all. It’s a smallish point and shoot. Recommend by several sites as a great travel camera
" It’s a smallish point and shoot." ~ I was comparing it to the Sony RX100III, which is about maximum for my jean pockets.
"Recommend by several sites as a great travel camera" ~ Indeed it is. It was Tom Dempsey's favorite pocketsize travel camera until Sony brought out their RX100VI.
http://photoseek.com/2018/sony-rx100-vi-pocketsize-8x-zoom-beats-10x-panasonic-zs100/Edit: In the above, Tom makes this statement:
In its favor, Panasonic ZS100 costs 55% less, captures superior edge-to-edge macro (5 cm close focus magnification best at 45mm equivalent, versus 8 cm on RX100M6), has longer battery life (CIPA-rated 300 shots vs 240 shots), and has stronger flash (8.0 meters vs 5.9 m at Auto ISO). In historical perspective, this 2016 feat of miniaturization allows image quality from the 20-megapixel ZS100 to rival all of my cameras used over 34 years until 2012 (beating my cameras up to 4 times heavier, up to 11x zoom range, up to 12 megapixels, at base ISO 100).
Thanks for the info. Cool link
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.