JohnSwanda wrote:
UV filters have no real purpose with digital photography. People use them for protection, but if you are using a polarizer, the UV filter is superfluous and just adds another piece of glass to degrade the image.
Like most bare assertions, this is partially correct, but misleading in numerous ways.
The photocells used in digital sensors are senstiive to UV (and IR).
All digital sensors have an integral IR filter, but not all have a UV filter built in.
The opitcal cement used in some modern lenses absorbs UV. But some
other lenses transmit UV.
A big problem with all lenses (but especially zooms) is flare. Flare can
be visibile or insidious. Either way it reduces contrast.
Anything you add to the front of a lens reduces flare. The worst surface that
the sun can strike is the objective (front) element of the lens, because it is
convex and thick.
So, in the absence of a good lens hood, screwing a piece of multi-coated plain
glass to the front of a lens often reduces flares and improves contrast.
To be good, a lens hood for a zoom lens must be adjustable. Few are.
So as usual, "the devil is in the details". There is no simple, categorical answer
that fits all lens, all cameras, and photographers. One needs to test one's
camera and lens(es) or at leaset study them.
In a discussion made up of "sound bites" and slogans, there will be very little truth.