Thanks Doddy. You wouldn't want to change your name, would you? My damn spellcheck keeps calling you Daddy. It was really a battle.
Doddy wrote:
No.4, you feel as though your being drawn into the left hand side of the shot.
markeisenbeil wrote:
Thanks Dave. I enjoyed your in depth outlook on the matter.
Hi, Mark, and thanks for your permission to download and prepare a 3D conversion on #4 to further illustrate my comments on its pattern of depth recession.
For benefit of those unfamiliar with viewing stereo image pairs, I have included a couple of handouts that have proven helpful in my classes, presentations, and workshops.
Please note that these images must not be downloaded, manipulated, or reposted in any form without the explicit permission of the original poster and myself.
Dave
The fourth one. The foreground and mid-ground detail are layered with the distant mountains giving a much better sense of the scale of the distance encompassed in the scene.
Stan
Nr 2 - is my first choice. The "S" of the road pulls your eye into the scene, taking you from front to mid areas, forcing the eye to follow all the way to the much more distant mountains (I like to call this "tension").
However,
Nr 4 - could win, with a recognizable and familiar subject in the foreground, and then clear and distinct mid- and distant-layers, again leading to the very distant mountains. (The low clouds and ground fog are fantastic!)
All are good, 2 and 4 are excellent.
#3 and 4 don't show any depth in my opinion. It is difficult for me to choose between 1 and 2 but I think I favor #1.
markeisenbeil wrote:
Hi Hoggers, I was wondering which photograph shows more depth.
2, 4 is a great shot. The fog adds a nice touch.
#4 The dog gives a sense of scale.
markeisenbeil wrote:
Hi Hoggers, I was wondering which photograph shows more depth.
No. 2. Strong lines pointing forward do the trick.
That was very interesting, Dave. Now I have to give my eyes a rest or I'm going to be bumping into walls.
Uuglypher wrote:
Hi, Mark, and thanks for your permission to download and prepare a 3D conversion on #4 to further illustrate my comments on its pattern of depth recession.
For benefit of those unfamiliar with viewing stereo image pairs, I have included a couple of handouts that have proven helpful in my classes, presentations, and workshops.
Please note that these images must not be downloaded, manipulated, or reposted in any form without the explicit permission of the original poster and myself.
Dave
Hi, Mark, and thanks for your permission to downlo... (
show quote)
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.