Windows batch file for adding "1" to image numbers once they pass 9999 (ie. 10012)
jlocke wrote:
I use a utility program called Bulk Rename Utility. It's a free download, and gives you every option you would ever want in renaming a bunch of files. You can see how the rename is going to look before committing to the change. With photos, I use it to rename my files from DSC0001 to something like 2019-01-08_Hockey-001. It can do sequential numbering, so the rename is fast and easy. It can also work with EXIF data in renaming your photos.
https://www.bulkrenameutility.co.ukDefinitely worth looking into!
(I might download for to have on-hand for future use.)
Thanks.
Longshadow wrote:
That may help, if I used Light Room.
You can batch rename on your HD, too. I used to do that before I was using Lightroom. LR just makes it easier as you can rename ON IMPORT to a more meaningful and unique name. I made a preset for date_time_custom where I can type in the event in the custom box before importing.
GrandmaG wrote:
You can batch rename on your HD, too. I used to do that before I was using Lightroom. LR just makes it easier as you can rename ON IMPORT to a more meaningful and unique name. I made a preset for date_time_custom where I can type in the event in the custom box before importing.
Tried that. Thought I did it before using Windows Explorer. Doesn't work right. Renames everything the same name with (##) at the end of the file base name (not suffix).
Luckily I was working in a test directory with only a dozen files.
Longshadow wrote:
Tried that. Thought I did it before using Windows Explorer. Doesn't work right. Renames everything the same name with (##) at the end of the file base name (not suffix).
Luckily I was working in a test directory with only a dozen files.
That's true, I forgot it worked that way. Have you tried some of the free software suggested here?
GrandmaG wrote:
That's true, I forgot it worked that way. Have you tried some of the free software suggested here?
Not yet.
Being a programmer, I wrote my own batch file to do what I needed.
But there was one I liked and bookmarked it in case I needed something more robust.
CHG_CANON wrote:
...... Best practices tend to get that name for a reason.
But it never specifies "Best" for WHO !
Agreed, any "best practice" is always
worth checking out, so it's good of you
to point it up. But you can't expect it's
best for everyone's working schemes.
.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.