Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Manual vs Aperture Priority
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
Jan 1, 2019 09:32:31   #
mvetrano2 Loc: Commack, NY
 
I use aperture mode 99.9% of the time and the other 0.1% I use shutter priority, I never use manual mode.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:33:01   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
RichardTaylor wrote:
They can be, depending on the lighting conditions.
I only use manual exposure when I think the light will fool the in-camera metering system and dialing in some exposure compensation is not enough.


I agree, I have a favorite honey spot where I go to shoot eagles in flight, when I began shooting them I used aperture with priority with EV adjustments but eventually switched over to manual simple because I learned that the camera could not consistently expose the birds when the background changed from a blue sky to a wooded forest for example. By finding the proper exposure for the birds in the given light, changes in the background do not effect the exposure of the birds which are the primary subjects of my efforts.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:45:26   #
A. T.
 
martinfisherphoto wrote:
From Previous post I have a feeling your still trying different avenues as you don't Understand the exposure triangle. I would recommend the book, Understanding Exposure 3rd edition by Bryan Peterson. If you can learn this knowledge than all types of photography will be much easier for you. You will easily know what mode to shoot in to capture the photo you want. Restricting yourself to one mode or the other is not feasible if shooting all types of subject matters....... Stop Guessing and Learn the exposure triangle.
From Previous post I have a feeling your still try... (show quote)


If you're writing to me, I fully understand the exposure triangle. I've spent countless hours studying, watching videos, reading books by authors recommended on this forum and many, many practice photos. It's not a matter of understanding, it's an ease and speed matter. I have learned and am extremely comfortable with shooting in manual mode; however, it takes time to make adjustments when lighting is constantly changing and I don't want to jeopardize loosing shots.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2019 09:48:06   #
BebuLamar
 
A. T. wrote:
If you're writing to me, I fully understand the exposure triangle. I've spent countless hours studying, watching videos, reading books by authors recommended on this forum and many, many practice photos. It's not a matter of understanding, it's an ease and speed matter. I have learned and am extremely comfortable with shooting in manual mode; however, it takes time to make adjustments when lighting is constantly changing and I don't want to jeopardize loosing shots.


There is no more exposure triangle. Peterson now calls it photographic triangle in the 4th edition of his understanding exposure book.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:52:02   #
philo Loc: philo, ca
 
BebuLamar wrote:
There is no more exposure triangle. Peterson now calls it photographic triangle in the 4th edition of his understanding exposure book.

just because Peterson says so doesn't make it so.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:53:20   #
A. T.
 
philo wrote:
i have been using A for years and years. However i notice that a lot of my portraits are a little soft. So now I'm switching to M and set a high shutter speed (1/250) A at 2.8 and auto iso. My images are a lot sharper and exp. is right on. The main reason for the soft images was due to camera shaking.


Thanks for your post. I have learned from my own photos that my number one priority is to get in focus photos; most everything else is fixable in post processing.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:53:35   #
suntouched Loc: Sierra Vista AZ
 
Re the Fuji pretty much the same with me however I have learned to rely on the histogram in the VF (before the shot)- for whatever reason the picture in the VF (both the X-T2 and 3) is always a bit lighter than the finished result. I go back and forth between auto ISO and manually setting it. And the +/- compensation is helpful. With shooting birds and BIF I am more concerned about keeping the shutter speed up than the aperture setting. When I am using the Nikon I most always use auto ISO and set the shutter speed and aperture where I want it to be and check the image afterwards to see if any tweaks are needed.

craggycrossers wrote:
Don't want to "rock the boat", and it's only 70 mins to New Year here in the UK …….. but I used to use DSLR (Nikon D700) in manual mode, but for the last 2+ yrs have been using Fuji X-Series mirrorless exclusively. Continue to use "manual" in the main and it's quicker than ever to get my shot. First, I can compose the shot in the (big) EVF without removing eye from EVF. Second, I can fine tune aperture on lens with left hand and cradling the lens, shutter speed (set to T mode on shutter speed dial) with either the front or rear command dial, and by 1/3 stops, and ISO on the ISO dial on top of the camera. The picture changes in front of my eyes until I'm content.

It's quick, easy to do and effortless.

Just one reason that my DSLR, and nice Nikkors, were sold some years ago and I moved to mirrorless, a move I remember some UHH-ers called "playing with toys" !

He who laughs last ……… leave you to make your own decisions ! Happy New Year …….. !!
Don't want to "rock the boat", and it's ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2019 09:53:59   #
A. T.
 
mvetrano2 wrote:
I use aperture mode 99.9% of the time and the other 0.1% I use shutter priority, I never use manual mode.


Thanks

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:56:33   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
A. T. wrote:
If you're writing to me, I fully understand the exposure triangle. I've spent countless hours studying, watching videos, reading books by authors recommended on this forum and many, many practice photos. It's not a matter of understanding, it's an ease and speed matter. I have learned and am extremely comfortable with shooting in manual mode; however, it takes time to make adjustments when lighting is constantly changing and I don't want to jeopardize loosing shots.


I think that you use different exposure modes in different settings and what you are shooting. I made the earlier comment about using manual exposure for shooting eagles in flight because my subject requires the same exposure in existing light regardless of changes to the background, however for most other things I use AV because I love controlling DOF, maybe if I were shooting a sporting event or a bicycle race I would use TV to insure that I was stopping action while shooting a variety of different subjects, I think that different situations call for different methods.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:57:05   #
A. T.
 
suntouched wrote:
Pretty much the same with me however I have learned to rely on the histogram in the VF (before the shot)- for whatever reason the picture in the VF (both the X-T2 and 3) is always a bit lighter than the finished result. I go back and forth between auto ISO and manually setting it. And the +/- compensation is helpful.


Thanks, I haven't used the histogram in the VF but I have been making exposure adjustments with exposure compensation.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 09:58:40   #
A. T.
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
I think that you use different exposure modes in different settings and what you are shooting. I made the earlier comment about using manual exposure for shooting eagles in flight because my subject requires the same exposure in existing light regardless of changes to the background, however for most other things I use AV because I love controlling DOF, maybe if I were shooting a sporting event or a bicycle race I would use TV to insure that I was stopping action while shooting a variety of different subjects, I think that different situations call for different methods.
I think that you use different exposure modes in d... (show quote)



Thanks, I agree.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2019 10:02:12   #
A. T.
 
philo wrote:
just because Peterson says so doesn't make it so.


Amen........

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 10:10:08   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
A. T. wrote:
I'm posting this question to get you guys/gals opinion. I learned to shoot in aperture priority immediately after my first DSLR purchase and soon thereafter, learned to shoot in manual mode. I really study photography to get as much information as possible to get better. The only issue that I see in shooting manual is the time it takes to make camera adjustments that could potentially cause you to miss a shot. I do understand that aperture and shutter priority is very fast.
So, what is your opinion regarding this matter?
I'm posting this question to get you guys/gals opi... (show quote)



In my opinion, shooting in manual mode is fine.... when it's possible. But it isn't always possible. It will cause you to miss shots or end up with incorrect exposures if you insist on using it in some situations.

Aperture priority auto exposure (AE), shutter priority AE are useful and... when used correctly... can improve your keeper rate and allow you to keep shooting at times when someone who is restricting themselves to "manual only" is still fiddling around with their camera and missing shots.

Today's digital also have manual + auto ISO... which is another useful form of auto exposure alongside aperture priority AE and shutter priority AE. (Some people who tell you they "only shoot manual".... as if that's a good thing... are actually using this AE mode. They're just kidding themselves.)

Key to using any of the AE modes is knowing when and how to Exposure Compensation and AE Lock. Most DSLRs and mirrorless cameras today have both these features built in and available during any AE mode. Some older models with early versions of auto ISO did not implement it well... such as they don't have E.C. available when using M + auto ISO. That makes auto ISO pretty unusable on those cameras.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 10:19:52   #
OlinBost Loc: Marietta, Ga.
 
I am still a beginner's beginner. I like Aperture for most shots but switch to Shutter in low light.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 10:20:39   #
A. T.
 
amfoto1 wrote:
In my opinion, shooting in manual mode is fine.... when it's possible. But it isn't always possible. It will cause you to miss shots or end up with incorrect exposures if you insist on using it in some situations.

Aperture priority auto exposure (AE), shutter priority AE are useful and... when used correctly... can improve your keeper rate and allow you to keep shooting at times when someone who is restricting themselves to "manual only" is still fiddling around with their camera and missing shots.

Today's digital also have manual + auto ISO... which is another useful form of auto exposure alongside aperture priority AE and shutter priority AE. (Some people who tell you they "only shoot manual".... as if that's a good thing... are actually using this AE mode. They're just kidding themselves.)

Key to using any of the AE modes is knowing when and how to Exposure Compensation and AE Lock. Most DSLRs and mirrorless cameras today have both these features built in and available during any AE mode. Some older models with early versions of auto ISO did not implement it well... such as they don't have E.C. available when using M + auto ISO. That makes auto ISO pretty unusable on those cameras.
In my opinion, shooting in manual mode is fine....... (show quote)


Thanks so much; this is what I was looking for in my original question. I don't care how fast a person is, when you have to make adjustments to two or more areas of your camera compared to one, that's a no brainer.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.