Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Hiking Shoes
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Dec 31, 2018 05:23:45   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Swede wrote:
Get Tyrol. I have had mine for 44 years, got them in grade 11, still going strong, 6-7 sets of Vibram soles, and plenty of treasured miles.

Which ever kind you get make sure the shell of the boot is just one piece of leather seamed at the back only.

Oh I should tell ya, I paid $55 back then, I'd bet they would be $500 or more now!

Good Luck

Swede
Get Tyrol. I have had mine for 44 years, got them ... (show quote)


That's a great boot! I had leather ski boots (telemark) made by them - few shoes on the market today can match their quality and comfort.

Reply
Dec 31, 2018 09:04:23   #
OnDSnap Loc: NE New Jersey
 
[quote=rmalarz]Dave, I've been wearing Merrell Moab boots for the last 14 years. I purchase mine at REI.

Reply
Dec 31, 2018 09:56:09   #
Tracht3
 
Davet wrote:
I am asking for advice on brands of good quality hiking shoes for my photography excursions. The last pair I purchased were great, but too small. I got them on line and that was the problem. I could not try them on first and walk around. Any suggestions will be helpful.

Solomon,oboz,merrill

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2018 11:02:42   #
hpucker99 Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
rmalarz wrote:
Dave, I've been wearing Merrell Moab boots for the last 14 years. I purchase mine at REI. My suggestion would be to go to a shoe store and find out what size you need prior to ordering anything.

Duluth Trading Co. has some good footwear solutions, as well.
--Bob


I also recommend the Merrill Moab line of boots. I picked up a pair the slip-ons in 2014 at REI, got 4 years out of them. Great for short days hikes and very comfortable.

Reply
Dec 31, 2018 11:49:15   #
fvatcha
 
I recently bought a pair of Salomon hiking/trail running shoes from REI. They are very comfortable and fit very well. REI has a very good selection of hiking shoes and boots as well as a good return or exchange policy. They have a great variety of hiking socks as well, which add to the comfort of a well fitting shoe. Just bought a couple of pairs of Smartwool hiking socks which are thick, soft and well cushioned. Going back to buy a few more pairs.

Reply
Dec 31, 2018 12:57:12   #
smada2015
 
I bought Redwings, going on 4 years, great pair of boots. Still waterproof after 4 years of hiking.

Reply
Dec 31, 2018 15:16:49   #
msettanni
 
Ditto on the Limmers. Best boots money can buy as far as I'm concerned, but I have to quibble with Gene51 regarding the break-in. They come in light-weight, medium-weight and standard, but all are robust, all-leather boots that do require some break-in for most people. Peter Limmer himself recommends a specific process for break-in, but once you get through it you'll find they are the most comfortable, stable boots available. Customs are even better, but have a one to two-year wait. Buy a pair of Limmers and you'll never regret it. They also make a walking shoe which I also own and wear daily. Again, they are all leather, robust and extremely comfortable.
Gene51 wrote:
They're not cheap, but boots made by Peter Limmer and Sons are without peer. I bought my first pair in 1990, and had them until 2012 when they became overcooked bacon in the back of my car (along with $10K worth of photo and hiking gear). I went back to Intervale NH to have a second pair made, and he even the sheet where he made the original measurements and outline of my foot that he used to make the first pair.

They are expensive, but it only hurts once. You will never experience blisters, foot pain, or any type of break in period. The boot has minimal padding inside, since padding is only used to allow for different feet to fit into generic boots. These things fit PERFECTLY! I have bought these twice, and each time have gone on an extended backpacking trip without breaking them in with no ill effect.

If you haven't tried a custom-made boot - you are in for a treat. Nothing on the market even comes close to quality and fit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AE1u5IENkTE
https://vimeo.com/78761597

My first pair cost me $250 in 1990. My second pair, which I ordered in 2012 and picked up in 2014, cost me $700, and in all likelihood they will cost more today. But I can recommend them without hesitation. It is the choice of through hikers (end to end) on both the Appalachian and Pacific Crest trails.

Some videos you may see talk about a 2 -3 month break in period. I've never experienced that. Your mileage may vary.
They're not cheap, but boots made by Peter Limmer ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Dec 31, 2018 17:27:20   #
Harp Loc: Albany, GA
 
Bokehen wrote:
Merrill lasted less than 7 month worth 6-8 miles hiking a day per one year.. Basspro would be the next best alternative as you can enter the store and try them on. if you choice to order online you'll end up having to order 3 different pairs as the shoes are each made differently. Mother use to order 3 pairs from zappos shoes until she found the right one.

Edit:

Just a reminder, merrill and a few other shoe manufactures do offer a 1 year warranty so if your shoes wear out sooner than expected you should get a new pair etc.
Merrill lasted less than 7 month worth 6-8 miles h... (show quote)


Take a look at ECCO. They are light & very comfortable. Amazon/Dillards or most major department stores or walking shoe shops have them. It's all I wear for all occasions!

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 08:19:12   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
msettanni wrote:
Ditto on the Limmers. Best boots money can buy as far as I'm concerned, but I have to quibble with Gene51 regarding the break-in. They come in light-weight, medium-weight and standard, but all are robust, all-leather boots that do require some break-in for most people. Peter Limmer himself recommends a specific process for break-in, but once you get through it you'll find they are the most comfortable, stable boots available. Customs are even better, but have a one to two-year wait. Buy a pair of Limmers and you'll never regret it. They also make a walking shoe which I also own and wear daily. Again, they are all leather, robust and extremely comfortable.
Ditto on the Limmers. Best boots money can buy as... (show quote)


The different boot weights are all about the number and composition of the mid soles and the type of leather used on the uppers and the mid and standard use thicker vibram soles. He makes 4 different boots - standard, mid-weight, lightweight and ultra-lightweight.

The ultra-light boots use a 1 layer polyurethane rubber midsole and a 2.4mm nubuck upper , 6mm vibram sole, are are his softest boots.

The lightweight has two 2.5mm composition rubber midsole and a 2.8mm waxed rubuck upper and same sole.

The mid weight has a single 5.5mm rubber midsole, 3mm top grain chrome tanned upper, and an 8mm vibram sole

The Standard has the same midsole, 3.2mm top grain chrome tanned upper, and the same vibram sole.

I have only gotten the standard, and as I have said, even though it is his heaviest duty boot, I have used them without breaking them in, as Peter Limmer suggested Here:

http://www.limmerboot.com/Limmerfinaltextscreen.pdf

However I have discussed this with him and he said that he is not surprised, particularly because I hike regularly and my feet are already conditioned. I generally get to a great level of comfort within a day or two of use. Interestingly enough, my second pair felt exactly the same as my first pair. In the two year wait for my second pair, I used a pair of Fabiano #36 boots, and a pair of Pivetta Eigers, both of which were amazingly good boots but never fit me properly. I had to break them (and my feet) in all over again, and still didn't enjoy the fit. My entry into heavy boots were a 1969 vintage Lowa Civetta mountaineering boot, which I bought to use with crampons in winter - so I could hike in the Adirondacks and Catskills in NY, White and Mahoosuc mountains in NH. I had them for 3 years and though I had the right size, they never fully broke in.

But as I said in an earlier post - everyone's mileage may differ.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 11:04:51   #
TJ Coelho
 
I have used Red Wing and Timberland. You must try them on in a store with the socks you intend to wear with them even if you intend to purchase them online. The only ones I have purchased online without trying them on first were LLBean boots, the ones with the rubber lowers, no LLBean store even close at the time. They fit fine.

Reply
Jan 1, 2019 12:06:04   #
Beemer
 
If you are near an REI, go there. They are knowledgeable, friendly and honest.

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2019 19:28:52   #
msettanni
 
No argument here Gene51. Limmer boots are, as you said and I dittoed, the best hiking boots made, period! And if the fit was so good you could wear them right out of the box without any hotspots, so much the better. But based on the testimonials of hundred of people online, that is not the common experience with Limmer boots, nor was it my experience. Most have to break them in, if only because that is the nature of the extremely robust and thus stiff leather Limmer uses. In any event, what does it matter? Whether there's a long break-in period, a short one, or none at all, they are worth whatever it takes to get them to the point they function as intended. Once there, the user (OP) will be one happy hiker/photographer/dancer. It's just great to still have a company in the world so passionate about their product that profit is secondary and quality is primary. I hope they live and work forever.
Gene51 wrote:
The different boot weights are all about the number and composition of the mid soles and the type of leather used on the uppers and the mid and standard use thicker vibram soles. He makes 4 different boots - standard, mid-weight, lightweight and ultra-lightweight.

The ultra-light boots use a 1 layer polyurethane rubber midsole and a 2.4mm nubuck upper , 6mm vibram sole, are are his softest boots.

The lightweight has two 2.5mm composition rubber midsole and a 2.8mm waxed rubuck upper and same sole.

The mid weight has a single 5.5mm rubber midsole, 3mm top grain chrome tanned upper, and an 8mm vibram sole

The Standard has the same midsole, 3.2mm top grain chrome tanned upper, and the same vibram sole.

I have only gotten the standard, and as I have said, even though it is his heaviest duty boot, I have used them without breaking them in, as Peter Limmer suggested Here:

http://www.limmerboot.com/Limmerfinaltextscreen.pdf

However I have discussed this with him and he said that he is not surprised, particularly because I hike regularly and my feet are already conditioned. I generally get to a great level of comfort within a day or two of use. Interestingly enough, my second pair felt exactly the same as my first pair. In the two year wait for my second pair, I used a pair of Fabiano #36 boots, and a pair of Pivetta Eigers, both of which were amazingly good boots but never fit me properly. I had to break them (and my feet) in all over again, and still didn't enjoy the fit. My entry into heavy boots were a 1969 vintage Lowa Civetta mountaineering boot, which I bought to use with crampons in winter - so I could hike in the Adirondacks and Catskills in NY, White and Mahoosuc mountains in NH. I had them for 3 years and though I had the right size, they never fully broke in.

But as I said in an earlier post - everyone's mileage may differ.
The different boot weights are all about the numbe... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.