Lolol Judge Andrew Napolitano? That fool lost all credibility since at least 2016, FOX should fire his ignorant butt.
Fall 2016: Napolitano was “100-percent certain” Hillary Clinton was about to be prosecuted. Undoubtedly, emailgate was a significant factor in Clinton’s November loss; but real legal experts generally agreed that there wasn’t much in the way of actual indictable criminal offenses. Judge Nap, though, was absolutely certain that Hillary was about to become federal prison’s newest inmate. On air, he stated,”the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming,” and, that he was “100-percent certain” that the FBI has enough evidence to indict and convict. Even FBI director James Comey publicly proclaimed Clinton to be careless, but not criminal, Napolitano persisted with his predictions. As of today, emails are old news, Hillary still roams free, and I think we can all agree that this “prediction” was really just a pipe dream for Hillary H**ers.
Lolol Judge Andrew Napolitano? That fool lost all credibility since at least 2016, FOX should fire his ignorant butt.
Fall 2016: Napolitano was “100-percent certain” Hillary Clinton was about to be prosecuted. Undoubtedly, emailgate was a significant factor in Clinton’s November loss; but real legal experts generally agreed that there wasn’t much in the way of actual indictable criminal offenses. Judge Nap, though, was absolutely certain that Hillary was about to become federal prison’s newest inmate. On air, he stated,”the evidence of her guilt is overwhelming,” and, that he was “100-percent certain” that the FBI has enough evidence to indict and convict. Even FBI director James Comey publicly proclaimed Clinton to be careless, but not criminal, Napolitano persisted with his predictions. As of today, emails are old news, Hillary still roams free, and I think we can all agree that this “prediction” was really just a pipe dream for Hillary H**ers.
Lolol Judge Andrew Napolitano? That fool lost all ... (show quote)
I don't disagree, except that his prejudices make him more likely to err in the other direction. That he would paint a picture of Hillary being in peril when she isn't, goes with his leanings and/or prejudices. His predicting Trump being in worse trouble than he is doesn't.
Dirt will tell you that if it on FAUX it is a lie. This one is going to be fun to watch.
I don’t disagree except to say never say always or never. I only quote him to say even he is saying this. Untill very recently he was more of a Trump advocate than Rudi. Don’t forget Trump wanted him for his attorney. I’m not saying he wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t true. I’m saying that if even he is saying this, it demands attention.
I don’t disagree except to say never say always or never. I only quote him to say even he is saying this. Untill very recently he was more of a Trump advocate than Rudi. Don’t forget Trump wanted him for his attorney. I’m not saying he wouldn’t say it if it wasn’t true. I’m saying that if even he is saying this, it demands attention.
Well I got smart a long time ago Thom, I am going to let the experts decide who is right and who is wrong, Crow leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Fox is always critical of Trump when it was appropriate.
Well I got smart a long time ago Thom, I am going to let the experts decide who is right and who is wrong, Crow leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Fox is always critical of Trump when it was appropriate.
Is that your attempt at humor? It was funny, but comedy can be tough to make a living at.
You're going to have a hard time convincing most Americans that paying some bimbo to keep her mouth shut is an actual felony. If this wasn't Trump, nobody in the World would give a rat's ass. It is just the latest "great hope" in a long string of failed great hopes that Democrats are clinging to in order to try and get rid of Trump.
I'm having too much fun watching every one of these stories crumble one after another. Can't wait for the next one.
You're going to have a hard time convincing most Americans that paying some bimbo to keep her mouth shut is an actual felony. If this wasn't Trump, nobody in the World would give a rat's ass. It is just the latest "great hope" in a long string of failed great hopes that Democrats are clinging to in order to try and get rid of Trump.
I'm having too much fun watching every one of these stories crumble one after another. Can't wait for the next one.
I’m at a disadvantage, knowing that you are part of a protected group. Others in this group are drunks, fools, and children. I suppose it’s only fair.
Can't be a felon if he's never been convicted of a felony. In fact, calling somebody one who isn't is blatantly a defamation torte, and people have won mucho money claiming damages on that exact torte claim. You's think that narcissistic judge would know better.
You're going to have a hard time convincing most Americans that paying some bimbo to keep her mouth shut is an actual felony. If this wasn't Trump, nobody in the World would give a rat's ass. It is just the latest "great hope" in a long string of failed great hopes that Democrats are clinging to in order to try and get rid of Trump.
I'm having too much fun watching every one of these stories crumble one after another. Can't wait for the next one.
The US could care less if he paid off a hooker to keep her mouth shut no matter where the money came from or who paid it. Unless of course you are a lib f*****t socialist dem that lives in fantasy land.
Only a felony when the money violated federal e******n laws and it appears this instance does! I have not seen any stories crumble. I wonder which ones?
Steven Seward wrote:
You're going to have a hard time convincing most Americans that paying some bimbo to keep her mouth shut is an actual felony. If this wasn't Trump, nobody in the World would give a rat's ass. It is just the latest "great hope" in a long string of failed great hopes that Democrats are clinging to in order to try and get rid of Trump.
I'm having too much fun watching every one of these stories crumble one after another. Can't wait for the next one.