wilpharm wrote:
like dirtbag (stumpy) you suffer from coprophagia also!!!
Bark bark all yuh do arf arf arf
Brave as hell from the other side of the fence.
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
SharpShooter wrote:
Is it Texas?
Maybe Florida?
How about Montana?
Seems r****m and guns go together somehow.
Can we use guns as a predictor?
Maybe high concentration of KKK members?
Maybe the state you live in?
What state is most r****t???
SS
I would say the state of progressiveness!
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
Kmgw9v wrote:
Only a r****t would care?
Actually a poignant post, K!
thom w wrote:
I suppose Lester Maddox was just a manufacturers rep for a pick handle manufacturer? Donald Trump’s “s**t hole countries” remark had to do with plumbing. David Duke, and others, have simply discovered that white sheets as clothing makes the most sense in the climate of the southern states (and Arizona). Can you believe that some actually see these as evidence of r****m? Preposterous, right?
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is no r****m. I did not. What I said was very few people are truly r****t in the original superiority/inferiority sense of the term. Truly, the ratio is 100 000:1 when counting people who cry r****m at every conflict of opinion and counting KKK or w***e s*********t agitators.
When everything gets labeled 'r****t' then nothing remains to define actual r****m.
As for s**thole countries, using any criteria you like one can describe these with no reference to 'race'. All countries with totalitarian regimes, mismanaged resources and rampant poverty and war qualify. Additionally, there is ample empirical evidence. Whose rushing IN to these countries?
Tex-s wrote:
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is no r****m. I did not. What I said was very few people are truly r****t in the original superiority/inferiority sense of the term. Truly, the ratio is 100 000:1 when counting people who cry r****m at every conflict of opinion and counting KKK or w***e s*********t agitators.
When everything gets labeled 'r****t' then nothing remains to define actual r****m.
As for s**thole countries, using any criteria you like one can describe these with no reference to 'race'. All countries with totalitarian regimes, mismanaged resources and rampant poverty and war qualify. Additionally, there is ample empirical evidence. Whose rushing IN to these countries?
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is... (
show quote)
One could assume this if they had never experienced it
Tex-s wrote:
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is no r****m. I did not. What I said was very few people are truly r****t in the original superiority/inferiority sense of the term. Truly, the ratio is 100 000:1 when counting people who cry r****m at every conflict of opinion and counting KKK or w***e s*********t agitators.
When everything gets labeled 'r****t' then nothing remains to define actual r****m.
As for s**thole countries, using any criteria you like one can describe these with no reference to 'race'. All countries with totalitarian regimes, mismanaged resources and rampant poverty and war qualify. Additionally, there is ample empirical evidence. Whose rushing IN to these countries?
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is... (
show quote)
The only ones he was referencing were ones whos populations aren't white. Valiant try though. Trump likes totalitarian regimes, so you know that isn't it.
Tex-s wrote:
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is no r****m. I did not. What I said was very few people are truly r****t in the original superiority/inferiority sense of the term. Truly, the ratio is 100 000:1 when counting people who cry r****m at every conflict of opinion and counting KKK or w***e s*********t agitators.
When everything gets labeled 'r****t' then nothing remains to define actual r****m.
As for s**thole countries, using any criteria you like one can describe these with no reference to 'race'. All countries with totalitarian regimes, mismanaged resources and rampant poverty and war qualify. Additionally, there is ample empirical evidence. Whose rushing IN to these countries?
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is... (
show quote)
R****m isn't an all or none concept. It's much more an analogue thing than a discrete one.
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
Tex-s wrote:
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is no r****m. I did not. What I said was very few people are truly r****t in the original superiority/inferiority sense of the term. Truly, the ratio is 100 000:1 when counting people who cry r****m at every conflict of opinion and counting KKK or w***e s*********t agitators.
When everything gets labeled 'r****t' then nothing remains to define actual r****m.
As for s**thole countries, using any criteria you like one can describe these with no reference to 'race'. All countries with totalitarian regimes, mismanaged resources and rampant poverty and war qualify. Additionally, there is ample empirical evidence. Whose rushing IN to these countries?
I re-read my post to be sure I never said there is... (
show quote)
Of course, when Obama referred to an African country as s**t and when Will Quigg, grand d**gon of the Cali KKK, switching his support to Hilary (
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/video-kkk-grand-d**gon-endorses-hillary-clinton/) and when Hillary Clinton’s p**********l campaign received more than $20,000 in donationscontributed by members of the kkk the f*****t progressives NEVER thought of any of it as possibly being r****t!!!!
You are correct in that most, and almost every f*****t progressive, misuses the term “r****t” and makes it interchangeable with bias, bigotry, and prejudice, which is intellectually lazy at best and just plain stupid at most.
Cykdelic
Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
thom w wrote:
The only ones he was referencing were ones whos populations aren't white. Valiant try though. Trump likes totalitarian regimes, so you know that isn't it.
The r****ts here are people like you, Thom, and your ilk....... you want every and any person to cross our southern border to be allowed in with no restrictions yet you never bring up the entire lost continent of Africa......one must only assume it’s because they are black using your dummmazzzzz logic.
Cykdelic wrote:
Of course, when Obama referred to an African country as s**t and when Will Quigg, grand d**gon of the Cali KKK, switching his support to Hilary (
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/video-kkk-grand-d**gon-endorses-hillary-clinton/) and when Hillary Clinton’s p**********l campaign received more than $20,000 in donationscontributed by members of the kkk the f*****t progressives NEVER thought of any of it as possibly being r****t!!!!
You are correct in that most, and almost every f*****t progressive, misuses the term “r****t” and makes it interchangeable with bias, bigotry, and prejudice, which is intellectually lazy at best and just plain stupid at most.
Of course, when Obama referred to an African count... (
show quote)
Shows KKK makes ass they seleves pretty goodly. Lol
thom w wrote:
The only ones he was referencing were ones whos populations aren't white. Valiant try though. Trump likes totalitarian regimes, so you know that isn't it.
Can one criticize a country with a predominantly black or brown population without being r****t?
Can one criticize a non-white politician without being r****t?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.