651roy wrote:
Amazing that even the word Leica brings out such emotions.
Yes Leica has fostered market branding and there are companies profiting from it.
Plenty of people willing to pay and show off the red dot.
Others of us find that one fits our “hands” and style. Yes RF cameras have many limitations compared to (D)SLR of any format. I sure have not felt the need to buy any brand of camera as a status symbol but as a tool.
Late Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
There were many good film rangefinders, not all of them expensive.
It was possible to manufacture a mechanical camera in modest numbers
with a modest investment of capital and still get the unit-cost down. They
weren't built with robots or a wave-soldering line.
Electronics manufacturing is a different ball game. There are huge economies
of scale --much larger than in mechanical or electro-mechanical manufacturing.
Thie means that mass-market cameras are much less expensive than specialty
cameras (i.e., anything Joe Consumer doesn't fancy).
So photographers end up having to buy mass produced digital cameras, because
those made in smaller numbers (Leica, Hassalblad) are just too expensive.
It's a consequence of the digital technology: extremely large capital investment,
but low unit cost in mass production.
When image-sensor maker Micron bought Zilog's vacant 8-inch CMOS fab
facility in 2006, the price tag for the outdated facility in Nampa, Idaho was
only $5 million--very inexpensive by today's standards.
Anybody here ever have a
custom digital camera built for them?
There are still few companies that will build custom film cameras.
Several photographers make their own photo paper (e.g., Beth Moon).
Nobody makes their own inkjet printer -- let alone their own image sensor.
Technology isn't neutral--if you pick a big-cap technology you are going
to have to buy off-the-shelf -- and unless you are rich, you are going
to have to buy a mass-produced product.
And cheap to buy isn't necessarily the same thing as cheap to own.
I've been using the same rangefinder since I was a kid: a German-made
Kodak Retina IIIc. But in the last 20 years alone, I've gone through a
dozen digital cameras. Seems like all digital cameras die after a while
and then aren't worth fixing.
Your digital photography is limited by what Joe Consumer (and his uncle,
Bob) want to buy. If they don't buy it, then the giant big manufacturers don't
make it. You may be able to get it from Leica or Hassalblad, but it will be
very, very expensive. And you are going to have to keep re-buying your
digital camera ever few years (or when the warranty runs out).