A signature on the face of a photograph distracts, no matter how one cuts it. Putting a signature and info on the backside works to authenticate the photograph. A small plaque near or below the hanged photograph can provide pertinent info that may interest a viewer.
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
I can certainly understand this philosophy and won't argue against it. Signed works, however, oftentimes add value to works of art. Even a print, not an original, of a painting that is signed by the artist has more value and prestige than an unsigned version. Certain graphics such as etchings are often signed and numbered as to the number of prints produced- limited editions are more valuable. Signatures authenticate the original work of artists and photographers.
For photographers who earn their livelihood from their work, it is important that there work be identified to folks who may admire it in passing and may wish to commission a portrait or purchase some existing work. If all the information is on the back of the frame or display, of course it is obscured from sight. In many communities the signed work of a prominent, well known or respected photgraher is added prestige.
All of this and excellent craftsmanship and presentation is important to the business of photography. Of course, I am referring to a elegant, well scribed conservative signature, NOT a mechanically engraved or imprinted stamp or logo- no commercial information, no address or telephone number! Just the signature.
Admittedly, this IS commercialism, business stuff, but in the business of art and photography we all have to promote our "name"- Sometimes our good name is our most valuable asset.
I can certainly understand this philosophy and won... (
show quote)