Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
Thinking about moving from Canon to Sony.
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Dec 9, 2018 11:14:36   #
rwoodvira
 
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of digital as I felt that the Canon chip at the time provided better color. 10d, then 40d, then 70d and added a 2nd body SL2. The latter was because of weight. I've noted before I had a bout with cancer, 4 major surgeries later (missing esophagus, parts of small and large intestine), I'm still around but I have occasionally a tremor which screws up my shot. I believe I need the 5 axis stabilization which most Canon products lack (all but the M5 which is video only). Sony color seems about the closest to Canon and I've been debating getting a full frame. I'm leaning towards the A7iii or A7Riii. I primarily shoot landscape and birds. I have several Sigma lenses and I understand with the MC11 adapter they work well. For the Sony I will probably get the 24-105 f4 to start. Have any of you made the switch and how has it gone to date? Thank you for your help.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 11:25:22   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
I have a Sony a7II and a Canon 5DIII, both full-frame. I don't shot Sony full-frame lenses, but the word is the physically smaller Sony body with a full frame lens comes to a package that is about the same weight as all the other full-frame offerings. It's more compact, not a significantly lighter weight, if at all. The stabilization in the camera is great for non IS / VR lenses, but it's not any better than Canon's current IS offerings, particularly EF v II / III lens models. Adapted lenses can work great, but they're not going to be better than lenses built for the native camera mount. Maybe a quality tripod and gimbal is the better solution for your situation, landscape and birds? L-plates, lens plates, tripod collars and quick release clamps all make a tripod a much more pleasurable tool.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 11:33:18   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
I have the Sony a7riii and love it. The ability (in the camera) to rapidly move among various settings is very helpful. Your idea for the first Sony lens is right on.

Reply
 
 
Dec 9, 2018 11:46:47   #
trainspotter Loc: Oregon
 
I don't know much about the great cameras you speak of.....but I DO know....that if a dollar is burning a hole in my pocket.....I WILL spend it! Good luck with your quest.. Merry Christmas to you and ALL on this forum. respectfully trainspotter

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 12:20:14   #
zug55 Loc: Naivasha, Kenya, and Austin, Texas
 
I think that the Sony A7 III and the 24-105mm are a great package. Both body and lens are image-stabilized. I switched from Nikon DX to Sony full frame in Spring and got this package. Both are superb. I got the Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 to cover the wide end. When I travel, I often only take these two lenses.

There still are some folks who claim that the Sony camera and lens package weighs the same as DSLR cameras. This is simply not true. Sony full-frame cameras are lighter than any full-frame DSLRs. Some Sony zoom lenses are heavy as well, but still mostly somewhat lighter than their Nikon or Canon counterparts. Sigma Art lenses unfortunately are extremely heavy in any mount. But there are a number of native Sony lenses that are very light-weight, particularly primes. A great example is the new Sony 24mm f/1.4 GM that weighs just under a pound. Canon and Nikon cannot match that.

If weight is a concern (it is to me), I would research the weight of each item you consider buying. The B&H web site is a great resource for that.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 13:26:19   #
repleo Loc: Boston
 
rwoodvira wrote:
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of digital as I felt that the Canon chip at the time provided better color. 10d, then 40d, then 70d and added a 2nd body SL2. The latter was because of weight. I've noted before I had a bout with cancer, 4 major surgeries later (missing esophagus, parts of small and large intestine), I'm still around but I have occasionally a tremor which screws up my shot. I believe I need the 5 axis stabilization which most Canon products lack (all but the M5 which is video only). Sony color seems about the closest to Canon and I've been debating getting a full frame. I'm leaning towards the A7iii or A7Riii. I primarily shoot landscape and birds. I have several Sigma lenses and I understand with the MC11 adapter they work well. For the Sony I will probably get the 24-105 f4 to start. Have any of you made the switch and how has it gone to date? Thank you for your help.
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of di... (show quote)


The 24-105 F4 G OSS is an outstanding lens and would be a great combination for any of the second or third generation A7's. Actually it should do well on the first generation also since it has in-lens stabilization. If weight is a concern, you may find the A6500 (APS-C with IBIS) with the E 18-105 F4 G OSS more than adequate for your needs. I have the 24-105 for my A7Rii and the 18-105 for my A6000 (APS-C - no IBIS). The FF combo is undoubtedly the better IQ, but the APS-C is still a favorite for travel or walking around. I don't do birds, but with the 1.5 crop factor and available 2X Clear Image Zoom the A6500 should be very versatile.

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 14:09:49   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
rwoodvira wrote:
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of digital as I felt that the Canon chip at the time provided better color. 10d, then 40d, then 70d and added a 2nd body SL2. The latter was because of weight. I've noted before I had a bout with cancer, 4 major surgeries later (missing esophagus, parts of small and large intestine), I'm still around but I have occasionally a tremor which screws up my shot. I believe I need the 5 axis stabilization which most Canon products lack (all but the M5 which is video only). Sony color seems about the closest to Canon and I've been debating getting a full frame. I'm leaning towards the A7iii or A7Riii. I primarily shoot landscape and birds. I have several Sigma lenses and I understand with the MC11 adapter they work well. For the Sony I will probably get the 24-105 f4 to start. Have any of you made the switch and how has it gone to date? Thank you for your help.
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of di... (show quote)


RW, glad you survived the cancer!
But why don’t you just get a cheap tripod???
SS

Reply
 
 
Dec 9, 2018 16:17:38   #
le boecere
 
rwoodvira wrote:
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of digital as I felt that the Canon chip at the time provided better color. 10d, then 40d, then 70d and added a 2nd body SL2. The latter was because of weight. I've noted before I had a bout with cancer, 4 major surgeries later (missing esophagus, parts of small and large intestine), I'm still around but I have occasionally a tremor which screws up my shot. I believe I need the 5 axis stabilization which most Canon products lack (all but the M5 which is video only). Sony color seems about the closest to Canon and I've been debating getting a full frame. I'm leaning towards the A7iii or A7Riii. I primarily shoot landscape and birds. I have several Sigma lenses and I understand with the MC11 adapter they work well. For the Sony I will probably get the 24-105 f4 to start. Have any of you made the switch and how has it gone to date? Thank you for your help.
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of di... (show quote)


The A7III actually weighs more than your SL2. The 24-105mm f/4 lenses weigh virtually the same. Net: The Sony will be a bit larger and heavier than your current SL2.

https://camerasize.com/compact/#715.21,777.681,ha,t

Reply
Dec 9, 2018 18:14:50   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
The only way you’re gonna save wieght is go m4/3. That Sony (and mostly the lenses) will out weigh your current canon gear

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 06:28:41   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
rwoodvira wrote:
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of digital as I felt that the Canon chip at the time provided better color. 10d, then 40d, then 70d and added a 2nd body SL2. The latter was because of weight. I've noted before I had a bout with cancer, 4 major surgeries later (missing esophagus, parts of small and large intestine), I'm still around but I have occasionally a tremor which screws up my shot. I believe I need the 5 axis stabilization which most Canon products lack (all but the M5 which is video only). Sony color seems about the closest to Canon and I've been debating getting a full frame. I'm leaning towards the A7iii or A7Riii. I primarily shoot landscape and birds. I have several Sigma lenses and I understand with the MC11 adapter they work well. For the Sony I will probably get the 24-105 f4 to start. Have any of you made the switch and how has it gone to date? Thank you for your help.
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of di... (show quote)


Many photographers are buying one mirrorless camera to add to their system. This way, there is no major move in one direction or the other. This way you can really give mirrorless a chance and see if you want to continue. After a few months you might be able to better assess your needs and wants.

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 07:33:28   #
MikeMck Loc: Southern Maryland on the Bay
 
rwoodvira wrote:
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of digital as I felt that the Canon chip at the time provided better color. 10d, then 40d, then 70d and added a 2nd body SL2. The latter was because of weight. I've noted before I had a bout with cancer, 4 major surgeries later (missing esophagus, parts of small and large intestine), I'm still around but I have occasionally a tremor which screws up my shot. I believe I need the 5 axis stabilization which most Canon products lack (all but the M5 which is video only). Sony color seems about the closest to Canon and I've been debating getting a full frame. I'm leaning towards the A7iii or A7Riii. I primarily shoot landscape and birds. I have several Sigma lenses and I understand with the MC11 adapter they work well. For the Sony I will probably get the 24-105 f4 to start. Have any of you made the switch and how has it gone to date? Thank you for your help.
I moved from Nikon to Canon at the beginning of di... (show quote)


I'm glad you are still around too! I sold all my Canon equipment in favor of a Sony RX10 IV. The reason was at 73, I tend to shake sometimes and I wanted something lighter. I shoot mostly in low light situations, stage plays and hockey games. I find the RX10 IV does everything I need. I also have a Sony 400V for a longer reach. Good luck!

Reply
 
 
Dec 10, 2018 07:44:35   #
SonyBug
 
zug55 wrote:
I think that the Sony A7 III and the 24-105mm are a great package. Both body and lens are image-stabilized. I switched from Nikon DX to Sony full frame in Spring and got this package. Both are superb. I got the Zeiss Batis 18mm f/2.8 to cover the wide end. When I travel, I often only take these two lenses.

There still are some folks who claim that the Sony camera and lens package weighs the same as DSLR cameras. This is simply not true. Sony full-frame cameras are lighter than any full-frame DSLRs. Some Sony zoom lenses are heavy as well, but still mostly somewhat lighter than their Nikon or Canon counterparts. Sigma Art lenses unfortunately are extremely heavy in any mount. But there are a number of native Sony lenses that are very light-weight, particularly primes. A great example is the new Sony 24mm f/1.4 GM that weighs just under a pound. Canon and Nikon cannot match that.

If weight is a concern (it is to me), I would research the weight of each item you consider buying. The B&H web site is a great resource for that.
I think that the Sony A7 III and the 24-105mm are ... (show quote)


I have the a7III and just got a very hard to find Tamron 28-75 f2.8. I went for the Tamron mainly due to the $800 cost and the f2.8. It is a SUPERB combination. I would recommend it highly...

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 07:46:14   #
SonyBug
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
The only way you’re gonna save wieght is go m4/3. That Sony (and mostly the lenses) will out weigh your current canon gear


My kit of Sony a7III with lens weighs a tad over 2 lbs. That is half of what most of my Nikon lenses used to weigh.

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 08:12:40   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
nikonbug wrote:
My kit of Sony a7III with lens weighs a tad over 2 lbs. That is half of what most of my Nikon lenses used to weigh.


this is due to the body...not the lens (if it is of equal focal length and f stop).
https://fstoppers.com/originals/comparison-breakdown-lightest-most-affordable-professional-full-frame-system-189030

Reply
Dec 10, 2018 08:15:43   #
mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma
 
The Olympus OMD e-m1 Mark II is worth taking a look at. Oly is noted for their image stabilization, 5-axis in body.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.