If I hadn't seen the details, the police report, the victim's narrative, his web site, and his lawyers petition, I never would have believed the nice lady who related the story. I will exclude names to avoid prejudicing the case which is now going through the legal system.
The man, 59 years old, a PhD, a pillar of his community in Sweden was visiting a friend, the nice lady I mentioned, in Florida. He carries his camera everywhere and takes as many as 100 photos/day, the best of which he posts; and has been posting on his website for years. The subjects are all over the place: including landscapes, street shots, architectural captures, and people . . . essentially anything he find interesting.
This tourist went out one day to an ocean front community, took a swim at the public beach and then sat on a wall, in his bathing suit, taking photos of "things". It was early and he was about 20 shots into his daily routine when the police came running up to him demanding his camera and memory card because he looked suspicious shooting from waist level using the articulating live view screen on the back of his camera. He relinquished the requested materials and was told he would be going to jail because he was now accused of pedophilia and perversion---one of the photos was of two young girls washing off in a very public shower/fountain. These girls were fully covered and were fully visible to anyone in the area, and, having seen the photo, were doing nothing even vaguely sensual. The man, who was interrogated for two hours at the beach and explained that he did not know American laws, in Europe he had taken shots at resort areas with no problems, that virtually everyone at a Beach walks around scantily dressed, that one of the earlier photos on the memory card was of two fat men washing sand off in the same shower/fountain, that he wanted to cooperate, that he would relinquish his laptop to prove there was nothing incriminating on it, and that the police were welcome to visit his website. The laptop was produced with difficulty since his friend had to drive it over from her home where he was visiting, the evidence was inspected, and the man was hauled off to jail - - - despite explaining that he had a return flight to Sweden scheduled for the next morning. He was charged with "disturbing the peace" (despite the police report that confirms he was doing nothing of the sort), apparently a catch-all that is used to describe anything the police do not like and to justify the time they spent investigating it , his camera and card was confiscated, his wallet taken, and his bail refused even though he had the cash ($25) on his person. He was detained over night, forced to miss his flight, never received any sort of apology, and eventually returned home without the confiscated equipment which was being held as evidence pending his return to answer the charges.
He now has his camera back in Sweden which had to be sent to him by his friend, but the memory card remains with the police. He sought legal help mainly because he is now afraid to ever travel back to this country with the pedophilia insinuations hanging over his head; and because the excessive actions by the police are a violation of numerous Constitutional Protections, more worthy of a Fascist State than the State of Florida. His lawyer, who is seeking to have all charges thrown out and then plans to sue for damages, has already run up bills of several thousand dollars, but is confident that his client will eventually walk away with a substantial award.
There must be something in the air in Florida, because this sort of thing is not an isolated matter. The Police do not appear to understand the differences between doing something that might be considered suspicious versus acting illegally. See this link:
http://www.murthalawfirm.com/mother-3-arrested-pictures-tourist-attraction-airport to discover how a mother with a point and shoot can be thought to be a terrorist.