Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
RAW vs JPEG Technical
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Nov 18, 2018 05:15:02   #
Boris77
 
AirWalter wrote:
First off it is not My article; it is on DxO's website. I'm sure a multitude of people have read comparisons about shooting RAW vs JPEGs by now, as I have. This article explained it in a way that struck home for Me and it was My intention to post a link to the article for other photographers like myself who were still looking for more clarity on the subject. It was never intended for those who consider themselves Ansel Adams. Yes, cameras are very advanced. I am still learning things about My Nikon D750, and I like many people on this site still love the part of the hobby of manipulating Their photos with post processing software, or just tweaking them a small amount to make them look a little better. I assume there are a lot of photographers who feel that way or the manufacturers of post processing software would not have such a large clientele, or are the rest of us just that ignorant?

First off it is not My article; it is on DxO's web... (show quote)


I totally agree that digital photographs are made to be manipulated, but if you guide the camera to get you close to the desired result, you do not need to shoot in Raw. A good quality jpg can be changed and saved a number of times and still provide more quality than most people make use of. Save the Raw for the rare picture worth the time to perfect, or the special project to satisfy yourself. I know no amateur photographers who regularly go back and change old shots; you might as well just save a jpg.
Boris

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.