Melt down
Nov 7, 2018 17:18:42 #
Hey Trumpublicans! Your Russian Czar is in full melt down mode right now.
I think he realized that he is totally screwed with the democrats taking control of the house.
He no longer has his sycophant Trumpublican house to protect his lying, treasonous ass.
Wait until he finds out that if he has Mueller fired the democratic house can reappoint him
as special prosecutor in January, and when he is appointed by the house, Trump can't
touch him.
You treasonous bastards are all going down! I hope you enjoyed your little Russian love fest!
I think he realized that he is totally screwed with the democrats taking control of the house.
He no longer has his sycophant Trumpublican house to protect his lying, treasonous ass.
Wait until he finds out that if he has Mueller fired the democratic house can reappoint him
as special prosecutor in January, and when he is appointed by the house, Trump can't
touch him.
You treasonous bastards are all going down! I hope you enjoyed your little Russian love fest!
Nov 7, 2018 17:27:40 #
Nov 7, 2018 18:02:23 #
kd7eir wrote:
Hey Trumpublicans! Your Russian Czar is in full me... (show quote)
Can you cite one piece of evidence that there was any conspiracy with the Russians? Keep in mind that there is no such legal term as "collusion". Collusion in and of itself, is not illegal under any U.S. Code. Mueller has been running a circus for almost two years and hasn't found a single act.
Mueller can't be a "special prosecutor" for Congress. Only the Executive Branch, specifically the Justice Department, can name a prosecutor, special or other. Congress can only request the Justice Department review actions for possible legal action.
It would be helpful if you had any concept of the separation of powers, and the U.S. Constitution.
PS - If Mueller were hired by the Dems, his position could be tied up by the President refusing to sign any appropriations bill related to Mueller.
Nov 7, 2018 18:29:45 #
kd7eir wrote:
Hey Trumpublicans! Your Russian Czar is in full me... (show quote)
Why didn't you post the meme you plagiarized this blather from? We all know you are incapable of cogent thought on your own.
You really have no clue how this all works, do you?
What 'treason'?
Nov 7, 2018 18:32:01 #
Trump has a purpose in firing the AG who had reclused himself from the Mueller investigation; and for replacing him with an acting AG who has not.
For those too thick too read between the lines: Trump wants to control the Mueller investigation because he is fearful of its' findings.
For those too thick too read between the lines: Trump wants to control the Mueller investigation because he is fearful of its' findings.
Nov 7, 2018 18:33:54 #
Pelosi is a gift that keeps giving. Trumps gonna enjoy this. Totally playing the media and Dems. They just don’t see the obvious. Lol.
So much for the blue toilet flush
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/07/so-much-for-a-blue-wave-4-of-the-biggest-midterm-takeaways
So much for the blue toilet flush
https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/07/so-much-for-a-blue-wave-4-of-the-biggest-midterm-takeaways
Nov 7, 2018 18:49:58 #
Kmgw9v wrote:
Trump has a purpose in firing the AG who had reclused himself from the Mueller investigation; and for replacing him with an acting AG who has not.
For those too thick too read between the lines: Trump wants to control the Mueller investigation because he is fearful of its' findings.
For those too thick too read between the lines: Trump wants to control the Mueller investigation because he is fearful of its' findings.
If that was the case, don't you think he would have acted as you surmise a long time ago?
What 'findings' would you be referring to? We all know if there had been any 'there' there, it would have been leaked to the press long ago. After all, what's a witch hunt without irate villagers with pitchforks and torches...
Nov 7, 2018 18:57:23 #
skylane5sp wrote:
If that was the case, don't you think he would have acted as you surmise a long time ago?
What 'findings' would you be referring to? We all know if there had been any 'there' there, it would have been leaked to the press long ago. After all, what's a witch hunt without irate villagers with pitchforks and torches...
What 'findings' would you be referring to? We all know if there had been any 'there' there, it would have been leaked to the press long ago. After all, what's a witch hunt without irate villagers with pitchforks and torches...
You have lost me.
Mueller's findings have not been released.
To assert that the investigation is a "witch hunt" simply because there have been no significant leaks is really twisted, strange, diversionary logic.
Nov 7, 2018 19:28:38 #
pendennis wrote:
Can you cite one piece of evidence that there was ... (show quote)
Oh, boy! Another s**t-house lawyer! Lots of business here in the Attic!
Nov 7, 2018 20:09:10 #
kd7eir wrote:
Hey Trumpublicans! Your Russian Czar is in full me... (show quote)
LOL, Can't happen smart guy. It would require a law that would have to be passed in both the house and the senate and then be signed by the president....
You are such a dummy Charlie Brown, looks like "Lucy" ( Your lying Media) has pulled the ball on you again.
Nov 7, 2018 20:14:04 #
DaveO wrote:
Oh, boy! Another s**t-house lawyer! Lots of business here in the Attic!
Not a sh**-house lawyer, but I do listen to attorneys who are versed in Federal law. I'm also familiar with the terms "collusion" and "conspiracy". as in their legal meanings. I know how to use Lexus/Nexis, also. You may want to see what former Federal Prosecutors Joe Digenova, and Andy McCarthy say about "collusion". They've been there seen that.
Instead of resorting to name calling, why don't you do a bit of reading, and learn for yourself? It only took me 15 minutes to research the appropriate statutes on conspiracy, and a word search for "collusion" turned up nada.
Nov 7, 2018 21:32:48 #
I'll bet in those two years he's scooped up some nice paychecks.
--Bob
--Bob
pendennis wrote:
Can you cite one piece of evidence that there was ... (show quote)
Nov 7, 2018 22:39:12 #
pendennis wrote:
Can you cite one piece of evidence that there was ... (show quote)
Evidence of the Trump campaign conspiring with Russians to help get him elected? Either you don't pay much attention to what is already out there, or you need better sources of information. Turn off -Trump Channel Fox so-called-News and other right wing propaganda crap and get some Real News for a change. Just a suggestion.
You're welcome!
Nov 7, 2018 22:58:24 #
Keenan wrote:
Evidence of the Trump campaign conspiring with Russians to help get him elected? Either you don't pay much attention to what is already out there, or you need better sources of information. Turn off -Trump Channel Fox so-called-News and other right wing propaganda crap and get some Real News for a change. Just a suggestion.
You're welcome!
You're welcome!
Zero evidence. Even comey said trump ain’t a target. Read the congressional record. Read COmeys statements.
Nov 8, 2018 04:59:54 #
pendennis wrote:
Not a sh**-house lawyer, but I do listen to attorn... (show quote)
I am sure we are all very impressed. Pigeon Chess seems to be more your specialty. This is the Attic, a sh**-house as it were, so don't get to wrapped up with yourself...I'm sure no one else is. Lol, you are a precious sort though!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.