Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
XT-3 and Lightroom
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 6, 2018 09:03:39   #
al13
 
I am contemplating putchasing the XT-3 and have questions concerning Lightroom’s ability to properly support it. Has anyone encountered problems with the XT-3 and LR Classic? I’m not sure I'd be willing to purchase a new program to support a new camera. Thanks in advance for help with this.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 09:14:43   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
al13 wrote:
I am contemplating putchasing the XT-3 and have questions concerning Lightroom’s ability to properly support it. Has anyone encountered problems with the XT-3 and LR Classic? I’m not sure I'd be willing to purchase a new program to support a new camera. Thanks in advance for help with this.


The latest 2019 versions of Lightroom CC and Lightroom Classic CC support the Fujifilm XT-3. https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html

In the event that an earlier version LR does not support a specific camera, you can usually use Adobe DNG converter to convert the file. OR, you can use whatever software comes with the camera, or can be downloaded from the manufacturer.

Adobe usually supports new cameras within three to six months of their availability in the marketplace.

Adobe Camera Raw is used in Adobe Bridge, Adobe Photoshop, and both Lightroom CC and Lightroom Classic CC. So when you update it, all four programs will use it.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 09:22:56   #
al13
 
burkphoto wrote:
The latest 2019 versions of Lightroom CC and Lightroom Classic CC support the Fujifilm XT-3. https://helpx.adobe.com/camera-raw/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html

In the event that an earlier version LR does not support a specific camera, you can usually use Adobe DNG converter to convert the file. OR, you can use whatever software comes with the camera, or can be downloaded from the manufacturer.

Adobe usually supports new cameras within three to six months of their availability in the marketplace.
The latest 2019 versions of Lightroom CC and Light... (show quote)


Thanks, I have the latest version of LR and read where it now supports the XT-3. However, I am looking for someone who has actually used it with their XT-3. Functioning properly versus we support it are sometimes contradicting.

Reply
 
 
Nov 6, 2018 09:33:57   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
"Functioning properly versus we support it are sometimes contradicting."

In that case, you should get some images and try it yourself. Either download them from somewhere like dpreview or take your own card to a camera store.

Sample Imanges: https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/5370103067/fujifilm-x-t3-sample-gallery/7464485770

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 09:36:11   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
al13 wrote:
Thanks, I have the latest version of LR and read where it now supports the XT-3. However, I am looking for someone who has actually used it with their XT-3. Functioning properly versus we support it are sometimes contradicting.

What sort of problems are you worried about other than whether Lightroom supports it? What bad experiences have you personally had previously that is making you skittish? The biggest issue with the X-T3 is its lack of 5-axis in-body stabilization.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 10:54:32   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
al13 wrote:
Thanks, I have the latest version of LR and read where it now supports the XT-3. However, I am looking for someone who has actually used it with their XT-3. Functioning properly versus we support it are sometimes contradicting.


It either works, or does not. If you have the latest ACR, and compatible software (current Bridge, Photoshop, Lr CC, Lr Classic CC 2019), it works.

It's not like Canon's situation where ACR didn't support Dual Pixel raw files with their 5D Mark IV.

If there were exceptions, they would be footnoted in the chart I linked above.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 11:06:41   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
al13 wrote:
I am contemplating putchasing the XT-3 and have questions concerning Lightroom’s ability to properly support it. Has anyone encountered problems with the XT-3 and LR Classic? I’m not sure I'd be willing to purchase a new program to support a new camera. Thanks in advance for help with this.


Most raw converters do not play well with Xtrans sensors - except for SilkyPix. The other guys are working hard to fully support these cameras, but they aren't quite ready for prime time. LR 2019 still isn't there yet. Capture One is pretty good, but also not there yet.

Reply
 
 
Nov 6, 2018 11:18:36   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
https://iridient.com - this is the Program that works best with Fuji files.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 12:33:03   #
al13
 
[quote=Gene51]Most raw converters do not play well with Xtrans sensors - except for SilkyPix. The other guys are working hard to fully support these cameras, but they aren't quite ready for prime time. LR 2019 still isn't there yet. Capture One is pretty good, but also not there yet.

That’s what I was worried about. Not sure what kind of problems LR is having with Xtrans sensors.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 13:26:32   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
I have LR Classic CC and have used it on RAW files with Fuji cameras that have X-Trans sensors. No problems experienced here. Have also used On1 Photo Raw 2018 - again no problems.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 14:52:33   #
al13
 
rjaywallace wrote:
I have LR Classic CC and have used it on RAW files with Fuji cameras that have X-Trans sensors. No problems experienced here. Have also used On1 Photo Raw 2018 - again no problems.


Exactly what I was looking for, user experience. Thank you

Reply
 
 
Nov 6, 2018 15:50:48   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
Al, you must have missed my post to you.

It is a well known fact that Iridient plays best with Fuji files.

al13 wrote:
Exactly what I was looking for, user experience. Thank you

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 15:52:38   #
al13
 
just saw it. I hate to add an additional step. Does it convert the raw to something else?

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 15:55:05   #
tdekany Loc: Oregon
 
al13 wrote:
just saw it. I hate to add an additional step. Does it convert the raw to something else?


If you want the best result, it is a small price to pay. At least try it.

Reply
Nov 6, 2018 15:55:43   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
burkphoto wrote:
OR, you can use whatever software comes with the camera, or can be downloaded from the manufacturer.


Right! Whatever you buy, you will have a way to process raw files. I would never put off buying a camera because the program I'm using can't process the files. There is always a way.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.