tdekany Loc: Oregon

Now your claim is funny. I don’t even know how to reply to that. The more I see you say, the less than think you understand photography.

newvy

So many opinions....and not one talks about the video capabilities. I recently made the switch. I shot the Halloween night with the kids and enjoyed our “Michael” dancing around the neighborhood in both incredible low light stills, and 4K video. My wife made a nice short video. Lots of fun! Enjoy

Vector

Forgive me if this was said previously as I didn't have time to wade through all the posts, but, I believe a mirror less camera would be full frame. Which means you lose the "zoom factor" of a crop sensor. So, if you want/need the reach it seems like the question is answered.

Comments?

leftj Loc: Texas

Better read up on mirrorless cameras.

Bill_de Loc: US

Why would you believe that?

---

BebuLamar

I am not sure what you meant but the Sony uses the same lens mount for the A7/A9 as the A6xxx so the A6xxx's have crop sensor.

leftj Loc: Texas

Change "would" to "could" and I could believe it.

joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois

Compare my images to yours.

User ID

That is just ford admitting that the 4dr sedan mkt belongs to the
Asian brands. its not in the least ford saying that the 4 dr sedan
is finished. You present a false equivalence.

`

n3eg Loc: West coast USA

Yes.

jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ

Same here. No mirrorless for my needs unless I choose to use it for only certain things like portraits, landscapes, and star trails and milky way. For sports, action and wildlife with be lenses they just don't make sense.

Hip Coyote

Cameras are like guns...small and light make control difficult, but more portable. Large makes for more stable shots but less portable. If you don't need light weight then I'd stay with a DSLR. This coming from an Oly M4/3 shooter. Fit the camera to your shooting style or subject demand, not the other way around. Go shoot a golf tournament where a silent shutter is necessary, a mirrorless would be perfect. Shooting birds, a DSLR would probably be better..IMO

Tomcat5133 Loc: Gladwyne PA

I think this mirrorless or DSLR thing is not getting the right answer. For some shooters here with Canon and Nikon kits full of great lens who
shoot in the wilds and other venues a DSLR is right to stay with. I have a friend she shoots portraits in a studio. We had this discussion
and I told her the Canon DSLR's and great lens are perfect for her. She likes the bigger camera and the settings and imagery.
The Sony success with mirrorless is more about the imagery and advanced sensor technology for me. I had Nikon's for years and
miss the size and focusing etc. I personally like the Sony IQ their sensors are on the leading edge. The size of the camera's
does come into play. My a7s II (still a gem) with a 70 to 200 f4 is a much lighter alternative. I always carry a RX100 4 and sometimes
the a6300 with 16 70 zeiss lens and really like the imagery. I also shoot video for the few clients I have plus my own work
and Sony's breakthrough was the a7s. We matched it up with 10k Sony pro camcorders as a B camera.
Canon started the indie DSLR video surge a few years ago but let the advances go to others.

markwilliam1

Are you serious really? Don’t make sense for sports, action, etc.? Man your misinformed!

dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia

And the lenses (at least for Canon) are said to work equal to or better on the FF mirrorless.