A or B
Nov 1, 2018 20:29:49 #
Nov 1, 2018 20:34:10 #
Nov 1, 2018 20:34:34 #
Definitely without the car, unless you shooting a commercial for that manufacturer.
Additionally, the blown highlights in the clouds and the overall lack of contrast doesn't really appeal to me in either one.
--Bob
Additionally, the blown highlights in the clouds and the overall lack of contrast doesn't really appeal to me in either one.
--Bob
kjfishman wrote:
Better with or without the car in the image?
Nov 1, 2018 20:52:23 #
The car "might" work if it was coming into or leaving the frame. Now it is just sitting there creating a distraction - as already mentioned.
--
--
Nov 1, 2018 20:53:01 #
Nov 2, 2018 04:20:39 #
Nov 2, 2018 05:44:57 #
Nov 2, 2018 08:14:05 #
Nov 2, 2018 08:47:37 #
I like the one WITH the car. It provides movement and shows just how small we are compared to the mountains and lowering clouds.
Nov 2, 2018 08:57:18 #
Nov 2, 2018 09:23:02 #
rmalarz wrote:
... Additionally, the blown highlights in the clouds and the overall lack of contrast doesn't really appeal to me in either one. ...
The exposure (ISO 800 1/640 @ f/20) was 1/3 stop darker than Sunny 16. Some of the clouds are blown out in the JPEG but if you have the raw file it's an easy fix.
On the other hand, f/20 and ISO 800 might be a bit much. f/8 is about the limit to avoid diffraction with APS-C. An ISO of 200 at 1/1000 sec @ f/8 would still give you plenty of DOF and the same look with little risk of noise.
The car adds nothing to the image.
Nov 2, 2018 09:23:14 #
kjfishman wrote:
Better with or without the car in the image?
B
Nov 2, 2018 09:26:44 #
Nov 2, 2018 09:41:34 #
I'm in the minority. I like A over B. To me the road looks misplaced without the car to add purpose to it.
Nov 2, 2018 09:46:32 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.