Obama vs. Trump 2020
Hal81
Loc: Bucks County, Pa.
She don't have a chance. Like Hillary, she has too much baggage being married to loosers that d**gged this country down. It took the Trumpster to get us back on track. The v**ers have spoken and the dumb democrats keep beating them selves. They keep shooting themselves in the foot. Just maybe some day they might come up with a winner.
dpullum wrote:
bob44044 quickly diverted the discussion a typical Republican talking trick.... that along with talking like a bagpipe with no pause for breath....
Bob did not give credible references and used a trump phrase.... "as we all know" or some such phrase. Are the 40+% Bobs in our country truly convinced or are they just defending the emperor who is with out clothing. Or worse yet actually see the emperor's new clothing when there is none.
For Bob and the others deprived of early learning:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvFpS3DrFk8bob44044 quickly diverted the discussion a typical... (
show quote)
Craw back into the bottle.
Quinn 4 wrote:
Just came up with the idea in 2020 that Michelle Obama take on Trump. Could she pull it off? She is Africa-America and a women and she is a lawyer. She does not have a history like Clinton has. Trump could not trash her like he did with Clinton. One of those if.
She can’t possibly run and win. She is a socialist.
America woke up and remembered that “socialism “ is a dirty filthy unAmerican word.
The Dems should run Nikki Haley against Trump in 2020.
I know she's not a dem, but at least she can legitimately claim Indian heritage!
mwalsh wrote:
The Dems should run Nikki Haley against Trump in 2020.
I know she's not a dem, but at least she can legitimately claim Indian heritage!
... and she has a strong track record of insisting that President Trump cut back on the public airing of the 'hunchback toad of menace'.
dennis2146 wrote:
No, that was the end of the Clinton administration. Then the trucks came back with the items Bill and Hillary had stolen.
Remember details count.
Dennis
He knows, just trying to spend time between pictures
You all have forget I said IF she should. Remember "IF"
bob44044 wrote:
She is not a lawyer, she lost her license. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993. after a Federal Judge gave her the choice between surrendering her license or standing trial for Insurance fraud!
Wrong, bucko.
Please read below:
“CLAIM
Barack and Michelle Obama surrendered their law licenses to avoid pending disciplinary actions.
RATING
FALSEORIGIN
Several similar items have been circulated during or since the 2008 U.S. p**********l e******n, all suggesting (without evidence) that Barack and Michelle Obama, both of whom obtained licenses to practice law in Illinois, were forced to give up those licenses in order to avoid having them revoked through disciplinary actions or criminal prosecution.
In fact, neither of the Obamas gave up their law licenses because they were facing disciplinary actions or criminal charges:(Snip)
Michelle Obama did not “voluntarily surrender” her law license; she requested that her license be placed on “inactive” status. The difference is crucial: a lawyer who has surrendered his law license has given it up and therefore no longer has a license; a lawyer who has gone on inactive status still holds a valid law license but is not currently engaged in any professional activities that require it to be active.
(Snip)
Barack Obama did not “surrender” his law license. Like Michelle, Barack Obama had no need for an active law license for the work in which he was engaged, so in February 2007 (after announcing his candidacy for the presidency) he chose to have his law license placed on “voluntarily inactive” status, and after becoming president he opted to change his status to “voluntarily retired.” Neither of the Obamas was irrevocably stripped of a law license through the action of “surrendering” them
James Grogan, deputy administrator and chief counsel for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois, affirmed that the Obamas were “never the subject of any public disciplinary proceedings,” and the Illinois State Bar Association continues to list Barack and Michelle Obama as Honorary Members of that organization.https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama-law-licenses/
mwalsh wrote:
The Dems should run Nikki Haley against Trump in 2020
I know she's not a dem, but at least she can legitimately claim Indian heritage!
I think that will be in 2024. She is an attractive intelligent woman with good leadership sk**ls, a good record and not afraid to speak her mind.
Only Condi Rice is up there too and she won’t run.
Dennis
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.