Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Best self-timer mode method
Page 1 of 2 next>
Oct 17, 2018 17:15:15   #
quenepas Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
Dear Hog Colleagues,

Question on best option for using self-timer release with family group shots.

My latest grandchild was born a few weeks ago so we all went to see the baby, mom and dad when they came home from the hospital.

I set up the Nikon D850 on a tripod to shoot 5 pictures per a sequence. In hindsight, I should have made some adjustments, like wait for the strobe to charge for the next shot and use manual focus. (Issue is, that when I touched the screen on Live to take the shots, the camera started to focus and sometimes didn’t get it just right.) Copy of one group shot is attached.

And there lies my question. Should I have used “Live” and tap the screen and take my place in the group. Or, simply set up the scene, compose, focus with manual, verify correct exposure, press the shutter-release button and take my place.

With some things in life you just can’t go back and re-do, but I want to make sure that the next time I do this, I get it right.

Thanks in advance for your comments.

Val



Reply
Oct 17, 2018 18:15:09   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
quenepas wrote:
Dear Hog Colleagues,

Question on best option for using self-timer release with family group shots.

My latest grandchild was born a few weeks ago so we all went to see the baby, mom and dad when they came home from the hospital.

I set up the Nikon D850 on a tripod to shoot 5 pictures per a sequence. In hindsight, I should have made some adjustments, like wait for the strobe to charge for the next shot and use manual focus. (Issue is, that when I touched the screen on Live to take the shots, the camera started to focus and sometimes didn’t get it just right.) Copy of one group shot is attached.

And there lies my question. Should I have used “Live” and tap the screen and take my place in the group. Or, simply set up the scene, compose, focus with manual, verify correct exposure, press the shutter-release button and take my place.

With some things in life you just can’t go back and re-do, but I want to make sure that the next time I do this, I get it right.

Thanks in advance for your comments.

Val
Dear Hog Colleagues, br br Question on best optio... (show quote)


I personally hate self-timers and never use them. I much prefer to use a wireless remote trigger so I can orchestrate the shot and shoot EXACTLY when I want to.

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 18:20:43   #
rook2c4 Loc: Philadelphia, PA USA
 
Before there is a next time, why not start experimenting right now with your camera and see which approach works best for you? And the more you practice, the better you will be prepared for your next group shot.

Reply
 
 
Oct 17, 2018 18:26:46   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Based on what you were working with I would have set it all up and pressed the shutter release. You could even take a test shot without you in it. The self timer needs to be set so you have enough time to sit comfortably and not just fall into place.

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 19:09:20   #
tinplater Loc: Scottsdale, AZ
 
I use a remote to fire the camera.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 05:23:59   #
Kiriakos
 
Does anyone knows if the iPhone can be used for remote triggering and how to set it up?

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 07:53:47   #
BebuLamar
 
Kiriakos wrote:
Does anyone knows if the iPhone can be used for remote triggering and how to set it up?


I use the Nikon WMU app. It works OK but lot of time it refuse to connect to the camera.

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2018 09:05:29   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
Kiriakos wrote:
Does anyone knows if the iPhone can be used for remote triggering and how to set it up?

Yes - with the MIOPS Dongle. Works great, although it is tethered to the camera.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 09:08:23   #
peterg Loc: Santa Rosa, CA
 
Kiriakos wrote:
Does anyone knows if the iPhone can be used for remote triggering and how to set it up?
There are a few options including MIOPS, Arsenal, Nikon's Snapbridge. None are as simple, cheap or convenient as a basic wireless remote; but they have more camera-control features.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 09:08:34   #
dsmeltz Loc: Philadelphia
 
MT Shooter wrote:
I personally hate self-timers and never use them. I much prefer to use a wireless remote trigger so I can orchestrate the shot and shoot EXACTLY when I want to.


Beat me to it. A basic wireless RF remote is relatively inexpensive and need not be visible. Also you can take multiple shots to merge later. Since yo are in the shot, you cannot see or control what everyone is doing. The remote allows you to take insurance shots.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 11:26:12   #
Old Coot
 
dsmeltz wrote:
Beat me to it. A basic wireless RF remote is relatively inexpensive and need not be visible. Also you can take multiple shots to merge later. Since yo are in the shot, you cannot see or control what everyone is doing. The remote allows you to take insurance shots.


I use Fuji remote app. You can toitally control the camera from your cell phone, zoom 3etc and control the shutter.
Probably many other cameras have similar remote control apps

Reply
 
 
Oct 18, 2018 15:06:28   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
If using the touch screen caused problems, don't use it. I would use auto focus with single point and the timer or a remote control.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 16:05:59   #
aellman Loc: Boston MA
 
MT Shooter wrote:
I personally hate self-timers and never use them. I much prefer to use a wireless remote trigger so I can orchestrate the shot and shoot EXACTLY when I want to.


Which is what I did in 1971, except it was a rubber squeeze bulb hidden in my hand
connected to the camera by a small diameter rubber tube which carried the air pressure
to the mechanical shutter release on the SLR. Many of you old-timers probably did the
same. I thought it was pretty cool technology at the time. In the sample photo, my hand
in the foreground is holding the squeeze bulb, and the air tube is hidden in the hay.
Think we might have been hippies? No comment.



Reply
Oct 18, 2018 16:13:45   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
aellman wrote:
Which is what I did in 1970, except it was a rubber squeeze bulb hidden in my hand
connected to the camera by a small rubber tube which carried the air pressure to the shutter release.
Many of you of a certain age may have done the same. I thought it was pretty cool technology at the time. LOL.


I still have one of those, it has 35 feet of 1/8" plastic tube rolled up on a spool as an extension! Haven't used it in years though.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 16:32:25   #
BebuLamar
 
MT Shooter wrote:
I still have one of those, it has 35 feet of 1/8" plastic tube rolled up on a spool as an extension! Haven't used it in years though.


And I can still use one of those on my DSLR

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.