Bipod wrote:
The only optical difference (besides the direction of the light), is that the air is cooler
and less turbulent in the morning. This means that distant views will be clearer --
all else being equal. Improved air stability and transparency means sharper shots,
but less atmospheric perspective (so mountains won't look as distant).
It's really not possible for sunrises and sunsets to be much different, since light has
no memory: it's all a matter of angles. And if you reversed the direction of the earth's
spin, the sun would rise in the west and set in the east.
However, a given location could have ocean to the west and land to the east, or
the opposite, which does affect the light. Also, the local climate could make
mornings tend to be foggy.
The only optical difference (besides the direction... (
show quote)
The only thing that may alter anything is the air density difference, if any.
They are simply opposites of each other. Direction moving up, direction moving down. Same light, possibly different mental perception.
Atmospheric and weather conditions, and the color of light are good to know, but primarily you should be thinking about how you want to capture the subject. You say, "Assume the target subject can be photographed in either," but that is too simplistic a statement - unless maybe you're shooting people and then you can turn them
You could have side light, reflected light, direct light or back light. Each presents its own benefits or challenges, depending on what you are trying to capture and how you want it to look.
Also, your distance from the equator is important because of the angle of sun. Up here at the 47th parallel, the golden hour is virtually non-existent in summer, while it goes for much more than an hour in winter.
Linda From Maine wrote:
Atmospheric and weather conditions, and the color of light are good to know, but primarily you should be thinking about how you want to capture the subject. You say, "Assume the target subject can be photographed in either," but that is too simplistic a statement - unless maybe you're shooting people and then you can turn them
You could have side light, reflected light, direct light or back light. Each presents its own benefits or challenges, depending on what you are trying to capture and how you want it to look.
Also, your distance from the equator is important because of the angle of sun. Up here at the 47th parallel, the golden hour is virtually non-existent in summer, while it goes for much more than an hour in winter.
Atmospheric and weather conditions, and the color ... (
show quote)
Yep, the angle the sun takes. Shorter for a more vertical descent, longer the more angled the descent.
Mountains and flatland make a little difference also. "Sunset" in Florida is usually "pouf".
gvarner wrote:
What subjects would look better in each, or does it make a difference? Assume the target subject can be photographed in either. I would be interested in your preference. Thanks. I'm thinking that each has its own special quality.
I think it's a good question. My thoughts are, go out and shoot the scene in the morning and then shoot the same scene at sunset (yea I know the sun is on the other side) and see which one you like the best. After all, it's what you like that counts. And I would venture to say that if you shot a morning scene and sunset, you could post process them to where you really couldn't tell when it was shot. So go forth and shoot to your hearts desire and have fun.
Linda From Maine wrote:
Bummer!
Yes, you have to be quick!
martinfisherphoto wrote:
Instead of asking this question you should be out forming your own Opinion... Talking about photography does little to hone your skills. Pick up the camera and get busy..........
This is a topic where honing your skills with experiments without first getting at least some education may be nearly worthless. An informal discussion such as exists here on UHH is perhaps sufficient for most photographers. But really serious photography my require a degree in meteorology to know how to predict or interpret actual confitions.
Reading threads like this one before going out to experiment is essential.
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
gvarner wrote:
What subjects would look better in each, or does it make a difference? Assume the target subject can be photographed in either. I would be interested in your preference. Thanks. I'm thinking that each has its own special quality.
Females in morning cooler light, more feminine, afternoon light warmer, better for males. In my experience.
billnikon wrote:
Females in morning cooler light, more feminine, afternoon light warmer, better for males. In my experience.
What would cause it to be a different color temperature, other than the ascension position?
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Longshadow wrote:
What would cause it to be a different color temperature, other than the ascension position?
Atmospheric conditions are beyond my comprehension, cooler light in the morning and warmer light in the afternoon is all I need to know.
There was no need to be so nasty to the person posing the question! Just keep quiet!
Apaflo wrote:
...Reading threads like this one before going out to experiment is essential.
I'm trying to remember how people learned photography pre-internet
sonnydazeu wrote:
There was no need to be so nasty to the person posing the question! Just keep quiet!
Using "Quote Reply" helps us understand to whom you are referring...
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.