joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
The latest and greatest iPhone allows you to blur the background after the image has been taken. Although at this point its not totally perfected I believe this may be the genesis of a new era in photography.
Also, some now have both wide angle and telephoto capability. Smart phones continue to inch their way up the camera levels.
The market for entry level cameras may soon be gone.
I would still want camera with good sensor and lenses. The gimmicks if I want is best done outside of the camera on a computer.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
BebuLamar wrote:
I would still want camera with good sensor and lenses. The gimmicks if I want is best done outside of the camera on a computer.
Many of the younger generations don't even own a computer. LR is available for phones and tablets. Adobe seems to be putting more emphasis on it than the computer version.
Most of us here on UHH are way behind on the technology curve, myself included.
I have a Samsung Galaxy Note 8. It has dual sensors at 12 megapixel each. It actually has a "pro" mode that allows control of ISO, aperture, white balance, and focus - and it shoots in RAW.
It is really an awesome camera that I'm always carrying in my pocket and can use when not carrying my D750.
MrBob
Loc: lookout Mtn. NE Alabama
joer wrote:
The latest and greatest iPhone allows you to blur the background after the image has been taken. Although at this point its not totally perfected I believe this may be the genesis of a new era in photography.
Also, some now have both wide angle and telephoto capability. Smart phones continue to inch their way up the camera levels.
The market for entry level cameras may soon be gone.
Computational photography is where photography is headed in the future; most of those here are really not interested, but none the less it is coming and will revolutionize photography as we know it.
So how much is it different from CGI?
My phone (iPhone 8+) takes great pictures. But it will never take the place of my real camera. First of all, phone cameras are super boring to use. Great for some stuff when you need something quick. But I don't see where it takes much skill or thought. I like thinking things through, deciding on lenses, shutter speed, aperture, ISO, etc. It's more of a process. I think younger people have less patience and want everything NOW. They don't care about the process and just want more immediate results. I'm not THAT old...I have all the technology. But there are lots of rewards in patience. I'm even researching film cameras....going back to "old school". I also have kids who use their phones for everything and I get it. But it's not for me. I like how the process is a means to the goal. Not hit a button and the goal is complete. To each his own. In the end you use what is good for you. I do agree that camera phones are getting better and better. But replace my real camera? Never! :)
joer wrote:
Many of the younger generations don't even own a computer. LR is available for phones and tablets. Adobe seems to be putting more emphasis on it than the computer version.
Most of us here on UHH are way behind on the technology curve, myself included.
Those who believe iphones will never replace cameras may also believe digital will never replace film. I believe digital is gaining.
---
I think that the idea of replacing DSLR's with cell phones if like replacing a microscope with a magnifying glass or a telescope with binoculars. And I'm wondering if cell phones will ever be able to handle an on-board accessorie flash, off camera flash, or multiple flash. Not sure how they could address that in a computing mode.
joer
Loc: Colorado/Illinois
Years ago Samsung was selling cameras. They even produced an upscale camera the NX-1 that blew most people away...proved they could compete with the big guys. Then they quit...saw the writing. The market goes where the money is...
Once you loose the economy of scale...which is currently happening...things become expensive and even dry up. Thanks to companies like Apple, Samsung and others, it won't take that long.
Sure there will always be collectors, Luddites and niche markets but the rest of us will eventually move on either by choice or inertia.
I’m with Audrey on this question, but it’ll be a sad day when Joe’s prediction materializes.
For what I want out of a camera, the digital cameras today have waaaay to much complexity. I don’t come close to using most of that complexity in my normal outings with my cameras.
I need a new car to replace my 2004 model. But when I look at all the technological geegaws and doodads installed in cars today, I think it’s no wonder I can’t afford a new car! And what if that technology goes haywire!? It costs enough to just keep the mechanics working but repairing the computing based features will most certainly cost major bucks!
I do understand and even embrace the favorable impacts that technology has given us, but at times and for certain types of things we do or use in our lives it feels like we’re being enslaved by it.
Stan
cell phone cameras may fill the Instamatic camera nitch but cannot replace fine cameras. I recall the days when you could buy a console containing a TV, radio and record player and speakers all in one box. For the non-discerning, the were OK but no where near the performance of a fine HI FI set.
joer wrote:
The latest and greatest iPhone allows you to blur the background after the image has been taken. Although at this point its not totally perfected I believe this may be the genesis of a new era in photography.
Also, some now have both wide angle and telephoto capability. Smart phones continue to inch their way up the camera levels.
The market for entry level cameras may soon be gone.
That's not photography! That's computer created image! it's okay if people like it!
Far and away, the best processing is done in the darkroom, whether it be wet or dry. I use my cameras to capture the initial image, write the score. I use the "darkroom" for the performance.
If one wants to process something "in camera", use a Polaroid.
--Bob
joer wrote:
The latest and greatest iPhone allows you to blur the background after the image has been taken. Although at this point its not totally perfected I believe this may be the genesis of a new era in photography.
Also, some now have both wide angle and telephoto capability. Smart phones continue to inch their way up the camera levels.
The market for entry level cameras may soon be gone.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.