Reasonable prosecutor?
Oct 1, 2018 12:25:31 #
FBI's Comey says 'no reasonable prosecutor' would bring a case against Clinton for emails
Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
These two quotes are very similar! Did they bring about the same result?
Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
These two quotes are very similar! Did they bring about the same result?
Oct 1, 2018 12:38:35 #
"Did" they bring the same results? Since the Kavanaugh investigation is still ongoing, "did" makes zero sense.
Oct 1, 2018 13:09:10 #
kd7eir wrote:
"Did" they bring the same results? Since the Kavanaugh investigation is still ongoing, "did" makes zero sense.
Clinton was exonerated at statement despite evidence. Kavanaugh investigation continued despite no evidence. That is what makes "zero sense".
Oct 1, 2018 17:47:54 #
Wrangler wrote:
Clinton was exonerated at statement despite evidence. Kavanaugh investigation continued despite no evidence. That is what makes "zero sense".
Contrary to the contention that there is "no evidence", there is an eye witness account. Frequently considered to be "evidence".
Oct 1, 2018 18:10:02 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Wrangler wrote:
FBI's Comey says 'no reasonable prosecutor' would bring a case against Clinton for emails
Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
These two quotes are very similar! Did they bring about the same result?
Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
These two quotes are very similar! Did they bring about the same result?
Based on what I know he's right. That's probably no charges have been brought. What's your point?
Oct 1, 2018 18:11:45 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Wrangler wrote:
Clinton was exonerated at statement despite evidence. Kavanaugh investigation continued despite no evidence. That is what makes "zero sense".
You know damn well you wouldn't want her on the court. Different things have different standards. You used to seem like someone interested in the t***h. People your age don't usually change. What's the deal?
Oct 1, 2018 19:15:38 #
Oct 1, 2018 19:42:15 #
thom w wrote:
You know damn well you wouldn't want her on the court. Different things have different standards. You used to seem like someone interested in the t***h. People your age don't usually change. What's the deal?
When I was about 14 years old, I took in my first horse to train for money. My father said, "Son, never get off a winning horse."
I still follow that advice.
Oct 1, 2018 19:50:55 #
jcboy3 wrote:
Contrary to the contention that there is "no evidence", there is an eye witness account. Frequently considered to be "evidence".
Who is the eye witness?
Oct 1, 2018 19:54:31 #
Wrangler wrote:
FBI's Comey says 'no reasonable prosecutor' would bring a case against Clinton for emails
Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
These two quotes are very similar! Did they bring about the same result?
Outside counsel tells Republican senators 'reasonable prosecutor' would not bring Ford case against Kavanaugh
These two quotes are very similar! Did they bring about the same result?
Unless Maryland picks up this case, it has long since passed statute of limitations (Maryland has no such law for sexual abuse against minors). Not remotely the same. Besides Kavanaugh is not facing any type of prosecution. It's a job interview.
Oct 1, 2018 19:57:22 #
Oct 1, 2018 20:00:50 #
McKinneyMike wrote:
Unless Maryland picks up this case, it has long since passed statute of limitations (Maryland has no such law for sexual abuse against minors). Not remotely the same. Besides Kavanaugh is not facing any type of prosecution. It's a job interview.
" It's a job interview." Mike
Very dodgy emotional and stability optics for a would be big time judge.
Oct 1, 2018 21:22:46 #
Oct 1, 2018 21:28:02 #
Texcaster wrote:
" It's a job interview." Mike
Very dodgy emotional and stability optics for a would be big time judge.
Very dodgy emotional and stability optics for a would be big time judge.
I disagree. His career, his reputation and his family is on the line. He is not being a judge in the present hearing. Guilty until proven innocent is not the law of the constitution.
Oct 1, 2018 22:30:24 #
Wrangler wrote:
I disagree. His career, his reputation and his family is on the line. He is not being a judge in the present hearing. Guilty until proven innocent is not the law of the constitution.
The stuff he's made of was on display for the world to see. Dr Ford showed more grit and she's just a girl.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.