SOLD/ Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-500 f/5.6E ED VR
Sep 27, 2018 18:39:37 #
This lens is immaculate as I was unable to use it shortly after purchasing it. I bought this in early spring of 2016 and only took a few images with it, one is shown in this ad. The asking price for this lens with the users guide and soft lens case that came with it is $1,050.00. I will pay for the shipping via Fedex and the insurance, as for payment I prefer PayPal but will except money orders and your personal check but they must clear first. PM me if you are interested.
Sep 28, 2018 06:38:42 #
1Feathercrest
Loc: NEPA
Cibafan wrote:
This lens is immaculate as I was unable to use it shortly after purchasing it. I bought this in early spring of 2016 and only took a few images with it, one is shown in this ad. The asking price for this lens with the users guide and soft lens case that came with it is $1,050.00. I will pay for the shipping via Fedex and the insurance, as for payment I prefer PayPal but will except money orders and your personal check but they must clear first. PM me if you are interested.
What you will ACCEPT (not except) is beyond my financial means, but am in awe of the very sharp focus and depth of field. Very handsome brute.
Sep 28, 2018 09:33:33 #
Looks good Jack. I only wish I could afford it. May I make a suggestion. The bear photo was meant to highlight the lens, but the over-sharpening makes one wonder if it was needed to make the lens look sharper than it is. IMHO.
Sep 28, 2018 09:51:26 #
dub3
Loc: Sunrise Beach, Texas
SpyderJan wrote:
Looks good Jack. I only wish I could afford it. May I make a suggestion. The bear photo was meant to highlight the lens, but the over-sharpening makes one wonder if it was needed to make the lens look sharper than it is. IMHO.
Not to change the subject of the post, but I’m curious how one can tell if the image has been processed or is unprocessed from the camera/lense
Sep 28, 2018 09:56:32 #
Sep 28, 2018 09:59:49 #
The only way I know of would be if I could send the Nikon raw file as a Nef. but the file would be huge and as far as I know I can't send it that way.
Sep 28, 2018 11:13:54 #
Simply put it is a procceed image , those are artifacts in background not noise....that being said it is a nice lens. !!!
Sep 28, 2018 11:24:06 #
Sep 28, 2018 11:24:33 #
I sharpen all my wildlife photos particularly the eyes that is what makes them sell in the galleries.
Sep 28, 2018 11:39:10 #
I sharpen and print large prints up to 44 " wide and 40 foot long if needed never had to print over 8 feet , on my own canon printer , you need to get better sharpening program like Perfect resize by On1 used to called Genuine Fractals cause that effect in the backgroud is horrible ....It still is a great lens the lens is capable of a whole lot more , really just get a better output program...
Sep 28, 2018 11:55:48 #
Sep 28, 2018 12:33:44 #
Cibafan wrote:
Thanks for the advice, I am a better photographer than a Photoshop user.
We all were at one time , years ago when I heard that digital had reached new levels around 6 megapixels I wanted to learn Photoshop and go from film to digital I started learning on CS1 , 2 years later got my first digital a Nikon D200 when it came out improved ever since...first book I bought Was Adobe Camera Raw ...helped me a lot....
Sep 28, 2018 13:21:27 #
Sep 28, 2018 20:00:54 #
It should preform beautifully it is a fx or full frame lens as is your camera, thanks for looking.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.