New Witnesses say it was them not Kavanaugh that Ford is remembering
Sep 27, 2018 09:06:16 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Check out the news on this.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/ahead-pivotal-senate-hearing-witnesses-surface-to-say-christine-ford-may-have-mistaken-them-for-kavanaugh.html
Sep 27, 2018 09:06:59 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
.....but...but....but.......Garland!
Sep 27, 2018 11:23:28 #
Sep 27, 2018 11:32:07 #
Sep 27, 2018 11:59:55 #
If these guys want to be believed, let them make these claims under oath in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
BTW - If you're watching the Senate hearings and your a Kavanaugh supporter, I'm sorry you're having such a bad day.
BTW - If you're watching the Senate hearings and your a Kavanaugh supporter, I'm sorry you're having such a bad day.
Sep 27, 2018 12:05:54 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Frank T wrote:
If these guys want to be believed, let them make these claims under oath in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
BTW - If you're watching the Senate hearings and your a Kavanaugh supporter, I'm sorry you're having such a bad day.
BTW - If you're watching the Senate hearings and your a Kavanaugh supporter, I'm sorry you're having such a bad day.
I don't see it as a bad day. Let her talk. She needs to prove Kavanaugh assaulted her, and not the guys saying they are the ones.
Sep 27, 2018 12:27:22 #
Sep 27, 2018 13:41:46 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
I don't see it as a bad day. Let her talk. She needs to prove Kavanaugh assaulted her, and not the guys saying they are the ones.
She doesn't need to prove anything. She just needs to be credible and she is.
Sep 27, 2018 13:59:53 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Frank T wrote:
She doesn't need to prove anything. She just needs to be credible and she is.
Being credible means (to a normal person) that she did undergo some sort of trauma. It does not PROVE Kavanaugh was the perpetrator.
Sep 27, 2018 15:38:37 #
Sep 27, 2018 15:52:58 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Frank T wrote:
She is 100% sure that it was Kavanaugh.
Are you calling her a liar?
Are you calling her a liar?
I am saying she does not remember correctly. She is mistaken on who, which is not hard to understand since she doesn't know where, when, city, nothing.
Sep 27, 2018 16:37:53 #
Elaine2025 wrote:
I am saying she does not remember correctly. She is mistaken on who, which is not hard to understand since she doesn't know where, when, city, nothing.
Yet Kavanaugh remembers nothing. Is it possible that he blacked out from alcohol consumption?
Sep 27, 2018 16:41:34 #
Elaine2025
Loc: Seattle, Wa
Frank T wrote:
Yet Kavanaugh remembers nothing. Is it possible that he blacked out from alcohol consumption?
What the hell are you watching? Dems look like r****ds and ass holes.
Sep 27, 2018 17:07:24 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Frank T wrote:
She doesn't need to prove anything. She just needs to be credible and she is.
Spoken like a true serf.
Sep 27, 2018 17:08:18 #
LWW
Loc: Banana Republic of America
Elaine2025 wrote:
What the hell are you watching? Dems look like r****ds and ass holes.
I have an explanation for that.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.