Opusx300

I am heading to Red Rock National Park this weekend. Looking forward to capturing some great landscape shots. I have the Sony a7iii and the widest lens I have is a sony 24-105mm. I would like to hear from the members of the forum if you think I should be considering purchasing a wide angle zoom or if you think i am covered well enough by the 24-105mm. Thanks.

AzShooter1 Loc: Surprise, Az.

Go with what you've got. It's a good lens. You are going to be far enough away that you will capture what you want with that lens.

mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma

You're all set!

Gifted One Loc: S. E. Idaho

For landscapes it's a mixed bag for me I have a Canon FF and also use 24-105. I love UWA and have 16-28 that I use a bunch. I also have a 14mm Prime that is useful. Many at UHH will tell you to shoot pano, or ect.

For me before I make a purchase of equipment I am certain of the need. I would evaluate your style and if seems you hit the 24mm and wsh a wide prospective then by all means shop for wide glass.

J. R.

Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida

Which park?
Regardless, I would want a wider lens, or be prepared to merge images in post.

randave2001 Loc: Richmond

I assume you are talking about Red Rock Canyon National Conservation Area near Las Vegas (about 20 miles east of the strip). I made a trip there about four years ago now and I carried three lenses with me that took me from 17mm to 200mm. Looking over the images I brought back from that trip I see the majority were taken at 24mm or longer although I still took several as wide as I could go at 17mm. It was nice to have that large a range to shoot with, but in a pinch (say, had my 17-35mm lens gotten damaged for instance) I could have survived with the range left to me.

An alternative to purchasing a wide lens is to rent one for the trip. If you would not normally use a super wide angle lens otherwise I would not recommend going out and buying one just for this trip. I would spend my money on polarizing and neutral density filters because the desert sun can be quite harsh, especially in the middle of the day. You might even consider driving a bit further northwest of Las Vegas (about 50 miles from the strip) and take in the Valley of Fire State Park while you are out there. Awesome red rock formations. I believe the day fee there is only $10.

Hope this is of help to you. Have a fun trip.

Opusx300

Thank you for your reply. I think I will stick with the 24-105 then.

Opusx300

Yes, you were of great help. I will stick with what I have. Was actually going to purchase the filters today. Yes, I am talking about the park in vegas and Valley of Fire is on the list as well.

RGreenway Loc: Morristown, New Jersey

I was just there and agree that that lens is perfect. If you want wider vista, use the panorama setting with the lens at its widest zoom.

frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.

What you have is fine....

Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington

Google says the panorama mode was omitted from OP's model. But shooting a series for stitching is a great suggestion. Gene51 even does multiple rows
See one example here: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-555342-1.html#9431929

.

wmcy Loc: Charlotte

Was there in May with an a7R3 and the 24-105. I got some great shots. You’ll be fine.

joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois

Save your money...the 24-105 is perfect.

photoman022 Loc: Manchester CT USA

I was at Red Rocks last year (in September) and the bulk of my photos were taken with my 28-75 Tamron f/2.8. Your lens should be more than adequate.

insman1132 Loc: Southwest Florida

Love Red Rock! Been there a couple of times, but many years ago. Your 24 should provide you with enough wideness. But I think you will be happier if you have more reach than 105??!!

In any case, have a Safe and Wonderful trip!