Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Eos lens to AE1
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 23, 2018 16:11:59   #
krashdragon
 
I see lots of posts about using old lens on digital cameras.
My question... Can I use my Eos lens... 24- 100 ( whatever) on an AE1?
Bought the AE1 cheap, works fine, came with an off brand cheapie telephoto.
Yes, I know I can buy old lens cheap, was just wondering if I can use what I already have for my 6D.
Using manual is no prob, just wondering if there's a way to actually do it.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 16:23:27   #
BebuLamar
 
krashdragon wrote:
I see lots of posts about using old lens on digital cameras.
My question... Can I use my Eos lens... 24- 100 ( whatever) on an AE1?
Bought the AE1 cheap, works fine, came with an off brand cheapie telephoto.
Yes, I know I can buy old lens cheap, was just wondering if I can use what I already have for my 6D.
Using manual is no prob, just wondering if there's a way to actually do it.


you will have problem controlling the aperture because the EF lenses are controlled electronically.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 16:32:31   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
You could have bought an EOS Rebel G for $20ish, probably cheaper than the AE1, and you can use all your EF lenses with autofocus and IS enabled. You still might do that.

The EF mount sits 2mm further from the sensor / film than the FD mount (EF - 44mm / FD - 42mm). An adapter with no glass would be similar to an extension tube where your minimum focus distance is slightly reduced, but you can no longer focus to infinity. Also, the EF lenses do not have an aperture control ring so everything will be wide open, not the best aperture setting for the 24-105.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2018 16:43:14   #
krashdragon
 
Ok. I wont bother. Bought the AE1 several years ago.
I do have a couple lens fron my older Canon, I think those might work.
Thanks.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 18:20:54   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
krashdragon wrote:
Ok. I wont bother. Bought the AE1 several years ago.
I do have a couple lens fron my older Canon, I think those might work.
Thanks.


It will be easier to find and use FD/FL lenses on your AE-1. If you want to shoot film with EF lenses, an EOS-1N or V is a great choice as are several other EOS film bodies. I bought a mint EOS-1N for $100, and all my EF lenses work perfectly with it with all features (AF and aperture control) enabled.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 18:59:46   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
krashdragon wrote:
Ok. I wont bother. Bought the AE1 several years ago.
I do have a couple lens from my older Canon, I think those might work.
Thanks.


Good decision. Any lens with electronic connections won't work on a camera expecting mechanical connections. It's pretty convoluted to get R/FL/FD/FDn lenses to work on EOS cameras, flange distance amongst other things, but the other way is almost unfeasible. I have adapted/modified several FL/FD/FDn lenses to EOS, but I can't even imagine how to begin thinking the other way round. If you want to use the AE-1 then look for affordable FD/FDn glass on ebay etc. There are still quite a few out there at good prices if you are patient. I still have an AE-1 and a T90 in good working order.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 19:22:34   #
BebuLamar
 
I have a few of the FD lenses I don't use.
3 50mm f/1.8. a 134mm f/2.8, a 200mm f/2.8 and a third party 80-200mm f/4.5.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2018 23:54:37   #
krashdragon
 
My very 2nd camera...Had to look it up....
I have an Canon FT QL with a 50mm 1.4 lens, and a secondary market 35mm and 135 tele lens that I purchased when they were new.
First camera was an Argus 75.
Xmas present when I was about 8 or 9.
Damn.... I'm old!
I'm guessing those wont work with the AE1 either, so I might start looking at F1 lenses. Or just use the lens that came with it.
Some how, those old cameras just seemed easier to use than the new digitals with way more choices, and too many menus and buttons.
Not saying my photos were any better, just not as many things to remember.

Reply
Sep 23, 2018 23:58:56   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
According to wiki, an FL lens will work on an FD camera.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_FL_lens_mount

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 00:09:26   #
Robyn H Loc: MainLine PA
 
There is no such thing as EOS lenses. There are EF lenses and their various sub models, EF-S, EF-M. No, they are not designed to work on an older FD or FL mount camera. EF lenses are all electronic.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 01:37:14   #
Peterff Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
 
krashdragon wrote:
My very 2nd camera...Had to look it up....
I have an Canon FT QL with a 50mm 1.4 lens, and a secondary market 35mm and 135 tele lens that I purchased when they were new.
First camera was an Argus 75.
Xmas present when I was about 8 or 9.
Damn.... I'm old!
I'm guessing those wont work with the AE1 either, so I might start looking at F1 lenses. Or just use the lens that came with it.
Some how, those old cameras just seemed easier to use than the new digitals with way more choices, and too many menus and buttons.
Not saying my photos were any better, just not as many things to remember.
My very 2nd camera...Had to look it up.... br I ha... (show quote)


Your FT QL lenses should be just fine with the AE-1. You may not get open aperture metering, but they should work.

Reply
 
 
Sep 24, 2018 07:17:41   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
krashdragon wrote:
I see lots of posts about using old lens on digital cameras.
My question... Can I use my Eos lens... 24- 100 ( whatever) on an AE1?
Bought the AE1 cheap, works fine, came with an off brand cheapie telephoto.
Yes, I know I can buy old lens cheap, was just wondering if I can use what I already have for my 6D.
Using manual is no prob, just wondering if there's a way to actually do it.


Nope.
I don't even think that there is an adapter.
If you even could it would be just a piece of glass with no control of aperture and in some cases focus.
Canon 30 years ago decided brilliantly to develop a 21st century system. Not compatible with the old.
There are hundreds of very cheap FD lenses available because of this decision. Just go on Ebay an get an FD lens for your AE1.
BTW do it before prices rise as people realize that those lenses will now work on the new R mount cameras with an adapter without an optical element.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 07:34:23   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Architect1776 wrote:
Nope.
I don't even think that there is an adapter.
If you even could it would be just a piece of glass with no control of aperture and in some cases focus.
Canon 30 years ago decided brilliantly to develop a 21st century system. Not compatible with the old.
There are hundreds of very cheap FD lenses available because of this decision. Just go on Ebay an get an FD lens for your AE1.
BTW do it before prices rise as people realize that those lenses will now work on the new R mount cameras with an adapter without an optical element.
Nope. br I don't even think that there is an adap... (show quote)


I found, starting a few years ago, the adapters to IBIS-enabled, EVF-enabled, Sony bodies started to drive up the price / value of these old FD lenses. I've sold off my FD bodies for film purposes and kept the FD lenses for a Sony body. For film, an EOS film body using my EF lenses has become my preference.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 07:47:30   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
I found, starting a few years ago, the adapters to IBIS-enabled, EVF-enabled, Sony bodies started to drive up the price / value of these old FD lenses. I've sold off my FD bodies for film purposes and kept the FD lenses for a Sony body. For film, an EOS film body using my EF lenses has become my preference.


I agree with you.
But there are still great bargains out there on Ebay.
A pristine 800mm L FD was recently found for about $1,200.00. Think about that on a new R camera. Premium lens at that price which the same thing in EF is 10x that amount.

Reply
Sep 24, 2018 08:50:47   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Architect1776 wrote:
I agree with you.
But there are still great bargains out there on Ebay.
A pristine 800mm L FD was recently found for about $1,200.00. Think about that on a new R camera. Premium lens at that price which the same thing in EF is 10x that amount.


Over the weekend I was editing work from an FD 300 f/4L purchased used for $300. Here's an example from a monopod, Sony a7II and metabones adapter. The challenge is first getting the exposure parameters and then the focus, everything done manually where a moving subject tends to have moved away .... 300mm is the longest focal length I have for a manual focus FD lens. Working from a tripod has been more successful with this lens / focal length.

Gold-breasted Starling by Paul Sager, on Flickr


Coming back to the OP's thread without trying to hijack, I've found that higher quality film has a major impact on the results, such as when I pulled out a circa 1984 Canon T50 and the original FDn 50 f/1.8 kit lens and loaded Kodak Ektar 100. For the most part, only the "professional" films are left now in 2018. The success with the T50 started an investigation that lead to an AE-1 and then a F1New and then a T90 and then a few of the FD L lenses, where demonstrations of the lens characteristics from Sony bodies helped significantly. But, after a few years I was developing two separate and unrelated kits where bringing both on photography travel was becoming impractical. So then I tried an EOS Rebel G. The results were fine, but only 3 AF points was too limiting. Then I found what had been a $2000 EOS 1V for $550 on ebay and I could drop all the FD bodies and instead travel with a film body, a digital body and EF lenses I can share with both cameras. Adding a Sony body breathed new life into the remaining FD lenses, that otherwise, were due for sale.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.