rdubreuil wrote:
It does make more sense than a ball head, although the OP is talking inexpensive. You'd be hard pressed to find a good quality gimbal for under 200 to 300 dollars. The gimbal head Steve's sporting in the video is a Wimberley, to the tune of 500 to 600 dollars, I pretty sure it's out of her price range.
Looking at the OP's posted photos, she is clearly into birds and BIF both of which would benefit by a gimbal. While most of us (myself included) will always prefer inexpensive. Sometimes, however, an idea will come along that causes us to reconsider if it benefits our shooting. I merely was offering a non-standard option which she might not have considered that might appeal to her. Steve's link, which I provided, made me rethink my position and how much I would be willing to spend in terms of a monopod. At least it gives her something to think about.