`
I'm too lazy to read such a long thread completely
just to post a short question to the OP ....
If the finder is too slow, which is a problem to no
one else, are letting the shot review run ? If you
are, turn it off ! Nobody in any hurry allows it to
run automatically.
`
wdross
Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
ronaldmilne wrote:
I have Olympus OMD-EM1 Mk 2 and nikon D500 The nikon leaves it for dead for birds in flight but for anything else the olympus is excellent. The electronic viewfinder is too slow to pick up the target. You can set it to multi target focus and set it to track and it is ok but not a patch on the nikon. I saw someone with an attachment on his hot shoe called olympus red dot which was a scope type of thing and you looked through it and he could pick up the target much faster, worth looking at.I have olympus glass so changing to sony (big learning curve ) or fuji would mean buying new glass.
I have Olympus OMD-EM1 Mk 2 and nikon D500 The nik... (
show quote)
The EE-1 viewsight is easy to use and increases your usable percentages immensely. Then I first used it, it was at a half triathlon that my grandson was in. I didn't even take the time to properly set it up before use (settings as set by the factory). I was getting about 60% sucess rate (handheld panning shots). With the EE-1, I was producing about a 80% success rate after working with it. Well worthwhile investment for handheld shots.
Shellback wrote:
I would rent them first - check out
Aperturent.com - or at least do a hands-on to see what fits your hands and "feels right" -
You can chat with the folks about what you shoot and let them show you what would work for you -
Address: 16475 Dallas Pkwy #375, Addison, TX 75001
Hours: Open ⋅ Closes 5:30PM
Phone: (866) 360-6161
Two other rental places are Borrowlenses and Lensrental.
If fast and accurate focus you're after then I'd pick the Sony. I prefer the A7ii but the FF lenses are more expensive, if budget is a constraint then the A6500 is a good choice.
I’ve found “horses for courses”, I love my Oly EM-1mk1, I use it for everything but sports and birding, there’s no replacement for the real-time speed of a fast DSLR. I use it with 4/3’s lenses and an MMF-1. Even with the battery grip and 12-60 F2.8-3.5 it weighs 1/2 what my nikons weigh with comparable glass. Also, anybody else build a 24-120 f2.8 lens? Or the 50-200 f2.8-3.5. No more than $300 for each.
GREAT example!
That's a Lumix G9 with 35mm-100mm f/2.8 on the left. I own a GH4 and the first version of that lens, which looks identical and weighs about the same.
I USED to use a Canon 50D and a 70-200mm EF, IS, f/2.8L, version 1, similar in weight to the rig on the right.
Because of the 2X crop factor, these two rigs produce nearly equivalent fields of view. The Canon at f/5.6 produces roughly the same depth of field as the Lumix at f/2.8, for a given focus distance and field of view. That can be a big help, or an annoying hindrance, depending on the subject matter.
Unless photographing sports, especially in terrible high school stadium lighting, I vastly prefer the Lumix setup!
Shellback
Loc: North of Cheyenne Bottoms Wetlands - Kansas
hpucker99 wrote:
Two other rental places are Borrowlenses and Lensrental.
Yes, but they are not local where you can walk in and get hands on -
I would not, and never have been influenced by battery life. I just carry a few extra, and change at the inevitable lull in action.
Shellback wrote:
Yes, but they are not local where you can walk in and get hands on -
Both are very reliable, fair, have great reputations, and are priced within dollars of each other on most rentals.
I've used them for special jobs where I needed a very expensive lens for a few days. I have a video producer friend in Charlotte who rents from them, too. He's never had issues.
You’re just talking about size of a lense the Canon is a professional Canon L lense I believe the quality of each lense will be a big difference in my humble opinion?
RichardSM wrote:
You’re just talking about size of a lense the Canon is a professional Canon L lense I believe the quality of each lense will be a big difference in my humble opinion?
Having shot with both...not much difference when it comes to sharpness and contrast, especially when comparing Pro line lenses from olympus and panasonic G Leica lenses. Their optics are high quality.
RichardSM wrote:
You’re just talking about size of a lense the Canon is a professional Canon L lense I believe the quality of each lense will be a big difference in my humble opinion?
That’s a Panasonic Professional lens. It’s on par with the Version 1 Canon 70-200 f/2.8L I used. The image stabilization in the lens itself is at least a stop better than the Canon. Dual IS 2 is good for 6+ stops of stabilization! There’s a tad more flare with the Panasonic, but for most tasks, it’s more fun to use.
Thanks. I ended up doing just that - Sony a6500 and the f/4 18-105mm lens. Got a good deal from the folks at Cameta.
That's not the issue. The issue was focusing before the shot, not reviewing after.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.