NNPA: Is the NNPA a r****t organization? The National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA), was founded in 1940 when John H. Sengstacke, of the Chicago Defender, organized a meeting...

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

Is the NNPA a r****t organization?

The National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA), was founded in 1940 when John H. Sengstacke, of the Chicago Defender, organized a meeting with other African-American publishers intended for "harmonizing our energies in a common purpose for the benefit of Negro journalism." The group decided to form the National Negro Publishers Association. In 1956, the trade association was renamed the National Newspaper Publishers Association.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Newspaper_Publishers_Association

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

You scare easy. What's the problem this time?

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Wrangler wrote:

Is the NNPA a r****t organization? br br The Nati... (show quote)

Leftwing agendas need to be camouf**ged in order to pass public scrutiny. At least that's what they use to do. Since emboldened by Obama they are full throttle race to the left.

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

Frank T wrote:

You scare easy. What's the problem this time?

Is it r****t to have an organization based on skin color? I know that is is not illegal as evidenced by the NAACP, Black Caucus or KKK, but it seems like it can be called r****t.

By the way, I am not scared. You jumped to a conclusion on this one.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Wrangler wrote:

Is it r****t to have an organization based on skin color? I know that is is not illegal as evidenced by the NAACP, black caucus or KKK, but it seems like it can be called r****t.

By the way, I am not scared. You jumped to a conclusion on this one.

Anytime someone questions a left wing issue Frank accuses them of being scared. It's all he has because it was proven by me, a long while back now, Frank doesn't know "Chickens**t" let alone s**t./

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

idaholover wrote:

Anytime someone questions a left wing issue Frank accuses them of being scared. It's all he has because it was proven by me, a long while back now, Frank doesn't know "Chickens**t" let alone s**t./

It really doesn't bother me. I know he is just projecting.

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Wrangler
In answer to your question, no it's not r****t.
There are Irish organizations, Black organizations. German, Italian, Polish and a bunch of others.
It's what you do that makes a r****t, not who you are.

Twardlow Loc: Arkansas

Wrangler wrote:

Is it r****t to have an organization based on skin color? I know that is is not illegal as evidenced by the NAACP, Black Caucus or KKK, but it seems like it can be called r****t.

By the way, I am not scared. You jumped to a conclusion on this one.

Let me say once again—please read and think—R****m is the presumption that one race is better or worse than others, strictly upon racial grounds.

(from Wikipedia)

R****m is the belief in the superiority of one race over another, which often results in discrimination and prejudice towards people based on their race or ethnicity.
(Snip)

The UN does not define "r****m"; however, it does define "racial discrimination": According to the 1965 UN, the term "racial discrimination" shall mean any distinction, exclusion, restriction, or preference based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin that has the purpose or effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural or any other field of public life.

thom w Loc: San Jose, CA

Wrangler wrote:

Is it r****t to have an organization based on skin color? I know that is is not illegal as evidenced by the NAACP, Black Caucus or KKK, but it seems like it can be called r****t.

By the way, I am not scared. You jumped to a conclusion on this one.

I tend to believe things done in defense should get more latitude than things done in defense. Also, the power disparity makes a difference.

forbescat

I'll pass on the r****t question but will address their stupidity. They just gave Maxine Waters an award. The article I read didn't say what the award was for, just that she used that platform to rant and rave against Trump again, again, again. Unless they gave Waters an award for spreading h**e, it's difficult to come up with anything Waters has contributed to the black community. And this organization IS for black publications. It's interesting to see the list of those publications that are now defunct.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

thom w wrote:

I tend to believe things done in defense should get more latitude than things done in defense. Also, the power disparity makes a difference.

So you would defer until the United States is under a nuclear attack to maintain your latitude. Also power is respected and that is a disparity that helps me sleep nights.

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

thom w wrote:

I tend to believe things done in defense should get more latitude than things done in defense. Also, the power disparity makes a difference.

??

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Wrangler wrote:

??

Don't even try. Not sure why I did.

Wrangler Loc: North Texas

Twardlow wrote:

Let me say once again—please read and think—R****m... (show quote)

Are you contending that NNPA was r****t in its inception but became non r****t when it made its latest name change?

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Wrangler wrote:

Are you contending that NNPA was r****t in its inception but became non r****t when it made its latest name change?

It's called spinning.