I've been accused by TWARDLOW of "pre-insulting". What the heck is "pre-insulting"? See the topic titled "GINGRICH" top entry of Page 7. A tactic of the lefties here is to insult...

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

See the topic titled "GINGRICH" top entry of Page 7. A tactic of the lefties here is to insult anyone they disagree with, to which they unable, or incapable of giving a cogent response. It's a tactic recommended by Saul Alinsky in his book, Rules for Radicals.
As twardlow (twaddle)is unwilling, or incapable of giving me a meaning of "pre-insulting", even though he accuses me of it. Any suggestions?

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

Neil, I find it interesting that you semi resort to Alinsky's tactics in your very quest for a definition.
--Bob

NeilL wrote:

See the topic titled "GINGRICH" top entry of Page 7. A tactic of the lefties here is to insult anyone they disagree with, to which they unable, or incapable of giving a cogent response. It's a tactic recommended by Saul Alinsky in his book, Rules for Radicals.
As twardlow (twaddle, twatface) is unwilling, or incapable of giving me a meaning of "pre-insulting", even though he accuses me of it. Any suggestions?

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

rmalarz wrote:

Neil, I find it interesting that you semi resort to Alinsky's tactics in your very quest for a definition.
--Bob

How's that, Bob? Fixed it. Is that better? It's the continuation of insults previously traded. (Terms of endearment?)

rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona

Neil, I see you revised your original post. However, the "name calling" was the inspiration to point out the Alinsky reference.
--Bob

NeilL wrote:

How's that, Bob?

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

rmalarz wrote:

Neil, I see you revised your original post. However, the "name calling" was the inspiration to point out the Alinsky reference.
--Bob

. "Pre-insult" is the inspiration.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

NeilL wrote:

See the topic titled "GINGRICH" top entry of Page 7. A tactic of the lefties here is to insult anyone they disagree with, to which they unable, or incapable of giving a cogent response. It's a tactic recommended by Saul Alinsky in his book, Rules for Radicals.
As twardlow (twaddle)is unwilling, or incapable of giving me a meaning of "pre-insulting", even though he accuses me of it. Any suggestions?

Realize you are dealing with a flaming lib f*****t socialist who will change the topic because he cannot answer, or he will run away. He says much that there is no explanation for. Tard is famous for his veiled insults, air of false superiority to cover for his ignorance, and condescending text to those whom he has no answer. Just a fact of life.

NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian

Elaine2025 wrote:

Realize you are dealing with a flaming lib f*****t socialist who will change the topic because he cannot answer, or he will run away. He says much that there is no explanation for. Tard is famous for his veiled insults, air of false superiority to cover for his ignorance, and condescending text to those whom he has no answer. Just a fact of life.

For good measure, add in "creating his own language".
IOW: he's being a good little Alinskyite.