Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Just Changed from Nikon to Panasonic Lumix G9
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 12, 2018 17:43:27   #
gary8803
 
Just changed from my heavy Nikon D3 and Sigma 500mm F/4.5 lens to a Panasonic Lumix G9 and Panasonic 100-300 and Olympus 60mm macro lens. Loved the D3 but its to heave to hike and shoot bird in the Florida heat. Looking forward to using a lighter rig. Now to start saving for top quality glass.

Reply
Sep 12, 2018 19:45:09   #
Robyn H Loc: MainLine PA
 
Best of luck on your new camera.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 05:36:48   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
gary8803 wrote:
Just changed from my heavy Nikon D3 and Sigma 500mm F/4.5 lens to a Panasonic Lumix G9 and Panasonic 100-300 and Olympus 60mm macro lens. Loved the D3 but its to heave to hike and shoot bird in the Florida heat. Looking forward to using a lighter rig. Now to start saving for top quality glass.


The glass you now have is top quality glass although the 400 end of the lens is supposedly just a very slight touch soft from the reviews and people who have the 100-400. Of course you can purchase the Olympus 300 and the 1.4X teleconverter to go with it. It is supposed to be sharper than the 100-400 at the 300 and ~400 (420 actually). Since you have the 100-400, you might want to add the Olympus 12-100 to your system. You can add in the Olympus 7-14 f2.8 or, if you don't need the speed and very slight extra sharpness, you can save weight, size, and money with the Panasonic 7-14 f4. And there are a bunch of other Olympus and Panasonic lenses to consider but I think these are the lenses that make the most sense and quality for your system. If you shoot birds and action shots, consider the Olympus EE-1 viewsight. Have fun no matter what.

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2018 06:10:24   #
ELNikkor
 
It probably feels like a toy compared to your Nikon, but keep us posted as to your feelings about the results...

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 08:58:30   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
The Nikon D3 is a superb camera but as all those cameras made by Nikon and Canon they are heavy. Long lenses are heavy also.
Your Panasonic is a lighter body but I have no experience with it and do not know how effective its AF system is for action and wildlife photography. The 300mm f2.8 Zuiko is a pretty expensive lens, it is of excellent optical quality from what I know.I am sure you can do quite well with what you have right now. As you use your camera more and more you will soon realize if a better optics is needed.
Good luck with your new camera.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 10:31:02   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
gary8803 wrote:
Just changed from my heavy Nikon D3 and Sigma 500mm F/4.5 lens to a Panasonic Lumix G9 and Panasonic 100-300 and Olympus 60mm macro lens. Loved the D3 but its to heave to hike and shoot bird in the Florida heat. Looking forward to using a lighter rig. Now to start saving for top quality glass.


I think you'll like the G9. Try to learn and use it for its specific advantages. It is not a dSLR. If you try to make it work like one, you'll just get frustrated. The advanced manual is worth downloading to your computer, tablet, smartphone... It's several hundred pages long, in JEnglish/Japlish. But don't be intimidated! It's worth spending time with, camera in hand.

If you get a chance, and the cash, swap the 100-300 for the Leica 100-400. Also try the Olympus 300mm, and the shorter zooms from Oly and Panny. The 7-14 Oly, 8-18 Leica, 12-35 f/2.8 Panny, 12-40 Oly, 35-100 f/2.8 Panny, 40-150 Oly, 12-60 Leica, 12-100 Oly are all very good to great, optically. In between, there are some great primes from Panasonic, Leica, and Olympus.

http://hazeghi.org/mft-lenses.html is a reasonably up to date list.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 10:38:10   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
ELNikkor wrote:
It probably feels like a toy compared to your Nikon, but keep us posted as to your feelings about the results...


Here's a link to a blog by a National Geographic grade photographer (Daniel J. Cox) who gave up his full frame Nikons to use Micro 4/3 "toys". He's been using various Lumix gear for at least five years.

Dan and his wife, Tanya, also conduct exclusive photo tours in exotic locations all over the world.

http://naturalexposures.com/corkboard/

You would be quite surprised at some of the photographers and videographers using Lumix gear.

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2018 12:38:54   #
JFCoupe Loc: Kent, Washington
 
You will enjoy the lighter gear. If the 100-300 doesn't give you enough reach, try the Panosonic 100-400. I use it with my Olympus EM 1 Mark II and it is great.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 13:19:06   #
kd7eir Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
wdross wrote:
The glass you now have is top quality glass although the 400 end of the lens is supposedly just a very slight touch soft from the reviews and people who have the 100-400. Of course you can purchase the Olympus 300 and the 1.4X teleconverter to go with it. It is supposed to be sharper than the 100-400 at the 300 and ~400 (420 actually). Since you have the 100-400, you might want to add the Olympus 12-100 to your system. You can add in the Olympus 7-14 f2.8 or, if you don't need the speed and very slight extra sharpness, you can save weight, size, and money with the Panasonic 7-14 f4. And there are a bunch of other Olympus and Panasonic lenses to consider but I think these are the lenses that make the most sense and quality for your system. If you shoot birds and action shots, consider the Olympus EE-1 viewsight. Have fun no matter what.
The glass you now have is top quality glass althou... (show quote)


I would imagine the "400 end" of his 100-300mm lens would provide rather poor quality...

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 13:34:32   #
PHRubin Loc: Nashville TN USA
 
Enjoy your lighter weight system!

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 13:55:37   #
Besperus Loc: Oregon
 
Ive been curious about 4/3. May give it a try. Now with talk of a full frame Panasonic I’m puzzled how long it will be before Oly follows suit? A Chinese company (?) built a Kodak branded 4/3 camera that came with two lenses for cheap yet had somewhat “advanced” features, the S1. For what it’s worth it may be junk.

Reply
 
 
Sep 13, 2018 15:15:01   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Besperus wrote:
Ive been curious about 4/3. May give it a try. Now with talk of a full frame Panasonic I’m puzzled how long it will be before Oly follows suit? A Chinese company (?) built a Kodak branded 4/3 camera that came with two lenses for cheap yet had somewhat “advanced” features, the S1. For what it’s worth it may be junk.


All 4/3 cameras were taken off the new-camera market a long time ago. The lenses adapt well to MICRO 4/3 bodies, however.

The 4/3 and Micro 4/3 sensors are physically the same size, but the new 16-20 MP sensors perform to a much higher level.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 15:31:24   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
kd7eir wrote:
I would imagine the "400 end" of his 100-300mm lens would provide rather poor quality...


Yeah, sort of misread that. But Bill from Burkphoto is dead on. Sell the 100-300 and get the 100-400. Although the 100-300 is a good lens, it is not as good a lens as the 100-400.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 16:50:53   #
mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma
 
You are going to feel so liberated! I use the Olympus 14-150 II, which is weather proof, as my walk around lens. The images are super, no lens creep.

Reply
Sep 13, 2018 19:47:41   #
alfaman
 
Burkphoto is right on the money. Switched from Canon 6D to Olympus omd 1 mk 2 with 12-40mm lense a year ago and also feel liberated. I'm 88+ years young and could no longer handle the 6D with a long lense. With the olympus I can walk around all day with no problem. AF is very quick and the EVF is great. The selection of oly/panny lenses is also exceptional. Have fun with your G9.( BTW after you use it for a while you will know that it is not "a toy")

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.