What do you think on this subject. You know how I think.
tramsey wrote:
What do you think on this subject. You know how I think.
"Is an i*****l a***n a citizen(?)"
Only in the mal-educated and misinformed imaginations of post-moderns.
"Illegal" seems like a difficult concept to grasp.
DJ Mills wrote:
"Illegal" seems like a difficult concept to grasp.
illegal - contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law. "illegal drugs"
i*****l a***n - a foreign national who is living without authorization in a country of which they are not a citizen.
Sounds pretty easy to me to understand. I think this is one concept that is black or white, yes or no, not much room for inbetween.
DJ Mills wrote:
"Illegal" seems like a difficult concept to grasp.
Not a difficult concept. Something or someone who is NOT legal or in a legal status.
tramsey wrote:
illegal - contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law. "illegal drugs"
i*****l a***n - a foreign national who is living without authorization in a country of which they are not a citizen.
Sounds pretty easy to me to understand. I think this is one concept that is black or white, yes or no, not much room for inbetween.
Illegal drugs?
Surely you mean undocumented drugs...
Article 4 of the United States Constitution, says that the United States "shall protect each of [the states] against invasion."
According to Webster Dictionary, the definition of 'invasion' is: 'an unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.' synonyms: violation, infringement, interruption, intrusion, encroachment, disturbance, disruption, breach
There are laws that describe the processes for non-citizens to enter the United States of which tens of millions have done lawfully over the years. Because there is "equal protection under the law", those that violate the law should not be rewarded as those who abide by the law should be. Entering the United States illegally is in fact a Federal Offence. If you or I think that we can commit a Federal Offence and not expect to be punished, simply stop paying your taxes and see what happens.
It is abundantly clear that our politicians lack the will to honor our Constitution and thus we should ask our public officials, who are sworn to uphold the Constitution:
1. If they support this provision;
2. What they plan to do to ensure implementation of this provision;
3. And then hold them to their commitment.
I think that’s the dumbest question I have seen here. Lol
tramsey wrote:
illegal - contrary to or forbidden by law, especially criminal law. "illegal drugs"
i*****l a***n - a foreign national who is living without authorization in a country of which they are not a citizen.
Sounds pretty easy to me to understand. I think this is one concept that is black or white, yes or no, not much room for inbetween.
I think people that cannot admit that these people are illegal are people who want use these people for their own benefit. Like cheap labor, and v**es!
tramsey wrote:
What do you think on this subject. You know how I think.
Seems this day in age a lot of people think there is a partly legal. I was raised , it either is or isn't. Not to hard to understand.
And, that is probably the real t***h of the matter.
Tesnoma wrote:
I think that’s the dumbest question I have seen here. Lol
Which question are You referring to? Or whose post is Your response directed to?
Shouldn't the original question be, "Is a legal or i*****l a***n a citizen?"
Because the answer is no for both of them.
When Melania came here as a legal alien, she wasn't a citizen.
When she violated her visa and became an i*****l a***n, she still wasn't a citizen.
So now that she's been awarded citizenship and we found out she violated her visa and thus, lied on her application, shouldn't her citizenship be revoked?
tramsey wrote:
What do you think on this subject. You know how I think.
No, i*****l a***ns are not citizens.
But open boarder liberal zealot lawyers have created a bundle of precedent legal findings that say anyone in the US is subject to and entitled to the benefits of our laws. Our constitution specifically denied this right to s***es, but the 13th ammendment overturned that.
An appelate court just found it “cruel and unusual punishment” for cities to have laws against people setting up camp on city property.
Logic and how we might think has nothing to do with it.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.