This is my first attempt at stitching. Any critique is welcome. I can use all the help I can get. I used a D750 with a 24-120 lens. The clouds on Denali are relentless so I waited for an hour to get two frames and then stitched together in Affinity.
Very nice, I like it. Great first anything actually!
Bill Munny wrote:
This is my first attempt at stitching. Any critique is welcome. I can use all the help I can get. I used a D750 with a 24-120 lens. The clouds on Denali are relentless so I waited for an hour to get two frames and then stitched together in Affinity.
Great stitching of the images. Did you apply any saturation and/or clarity to the image? I ask because the colors of the trees are look artificial. Also, there's a fare amount of noise in the sky which is easy to correct.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
You say you waited and hour to get to shots to stitch because of the clouds - as you have fit all so very nicely causes me to wonder if you superimposed any part of the image...
Good job with the panorama. However, the green is off. Also, if you bring down the shadows a little bit, it would look more natural at the base of the mountains. Would also help with the trees. I think I stood in this exact spot a couple years ago waiting for the clouds to move. (They did.)
Bill Munny wrote:
This is my first attempt at stitching. Any critique is welcome. I can use all the help I can get. I used a D750 with a 24-120 lens. The clouds on Denali are relentless so I waited for an hour to get two frames and then stitched together in Affinity.
From where I sit, you don't need any help at all.
Very well photographed!!
Thanks for the suggestions. Not sure what you mean by superimposed but they are overlapped by about 1/4 of the frames. I used two frames taken about 10 seconds apart. The greens in Alaska are very vivid. The first comment I made after getting off the plane was "it is so green". Maybe the photos are too green, but being from brown Colorado (35 years of drought and beetle killed trees everywhere) may have skewed my vision of "green". I will tone it down and work with the shadows to see how that looks.
Bill Munny wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions. Not sure what you mean by superimposed but they are overlapped by about 1/4 of the frames. I used two frames taken about 10 seconds apart. The greens in Alaska are very vivid. The first comment I made after getting off the plane was "it is so green". Maybe the photos are too green, but being from brown Colorado (35 years of drought and beetle killed trees everywhere) may have skewed my vision of "green". I will tone it down and work with the shadows to see how that looks.
Thanks for the suggestions. Not sure what you mea... (
show quote)
I could be wrong too but my first impression of the green was that there was a little too much blue in the green. I would love to see the photo again if you do any changes!
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
I could be wrong too but my first impression of the green was that there was a little too much blue in the green. I would love to see the photo again if you do any changes!
Maybe a bit of color balance correction needed because of the time of day (appears to be around noon from the cloud shadows) and, the altitude?
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
Bill Munny wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions. Not sure what you mean by superimposed but they are overlapped by about 1/4 of the frames. I used two frames taken about 10 seconds apart. .
I mis-interpreted your comment - my brain read it as waiting an hour to take the second image. Sorry
Going against the grain - I like the colors.
Excellent first effort! The colors do not disturb me, having been to Alaska in the spring.
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
I could be wrong too but my first impression of the green was that there was a little too much blue in the green. I would love to see the photo again if you do any changes!
That was my thought, too. Nice job on the stitching and photography. Not often one can actually see Denali.
Okay, I tried your suggestions. Got rid of most of the noise in the sky. Lightened up the greens and worked with the shadows. It seems to be more vivid and lively. Please let me know if I am on the right track or I need to do something different. Thanks to all, I am on the learning path with some excellent mentors.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
Actually, I think the original is the more vivid and lively image; like it much better than the 2nd image
Thanks, BboH, and I still like the first one better also. I need more practice with PP.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.