Pocketable compact
Aug 17, 2018 07:02:53 #
I have had the Sony RX100M4 for more than two years and have used it extensively when traveling and just around town when I want to have a camera with me but don’t want to lug my D800e around. I am quite satisfied with the Sony. Like any camera, there are compromises but overall, it delivers excellent performance.
Aug 17, 2018 07:17:01 #
I opted for the Sony RX100 (first version) and the RX100 VI (latest version). The latest one has many features that I find useful including the 24-200mm (equivalent) lens, but the cost is high $1,200.
Aug 17, 2018 07:18:45 #
Grumpy wrote:
Thinking of buying a lightweight compact for those... (show quote)
A friend of mine captured some nice images of his vacation to Italy using his iPhone 8 and a lens he purchased for about $100 to attach to the phone. I use a small Nikon that I have on a lariat around my neck as a riding my Harley. I think I paid $80 for another eBay.
Aug 17, 2018 07:54:42 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Grumpy wrote:
Thinking of buying a lightweight compact for those... (show quote)
I like my Sony DSC-HX series camera's. I use the DSC-HX90V most of the time know. It has a pop up viewfinder, nice for out doors, a very sharp 24-720 mm Zeiss lens. I find myself using this camera a lot, I put it in a belt pouch most of the time so it is always ready to use.
Aug 17, 2018 08:33:01 #
Sony rx100V is my pocket camera, pop viewfinder works great as I agree, seeing the screen is difficult in lots of situations. The Sony rx 100 series is great, lots of options for price and zoom range.
Aug 17, 2018 08:51:02 #
The baby Sony Cyber‑shot DSC‑RX100 can be had for about $365 from B&H and has the sharpest lens of any tiny camera. If you want more features then look at the later generations of this camera all the way to version VI for $1,200 but with a viewfinder and a 28-200 zoom lens. Nothing compares in sharpness or size to these Sony cameras.
Aug 17, 2018 09:30:10 #
Aug 17, 2018 09:36:16 #
I agree, the Lumix TZ range is an excellent choice, I have owned a TZ10, a TZ20 and now have a TZ70, they are all excellent cameras and really pocketable. If you have one with a GPS they tend to be battery eaters though.
Aug 17, 2018 09:41:02 #
In my opinion the lens on the RX100v is better than the lens on the RX100vi.
The RX100v has a 24-70 that "narrows" from f1.8 to f2.8, and has a built-in ND filter. The mark vi has a 24-200 (equivalent) zoom that goes from 2.8 to 4.5. (At 100mm, it is about f4.) The steadyshot is better, but it has to be.
There are some other minor differences (the new one has a touchscreen that is not as good as Panasonic, but still offers "touch shutter"). I am also told the eye AF is faster. But to me, the image quality on the model V is slightly better, particularly in low light.
All of them are great cameras though. You literally can't go wrong with any of the new 1" sensors, you just get different trade-offs.
The RX100v has a 24-70 that "narrows" from f1.8 to f2.8, and has a built-in ND filter. The mark vi has a 24-200 (equivalent) zoom that goes from 2.8 to 4.5. (At 100mm, it is about f4.) The steadyshot is better, but it has to be.
There are some other minor differences (the new one has a touchscreen that is not as good as Panasonic, but still offers "touch shutter"). I am also told the eye AF is faster. But to me, the image quality on the model V is slightly better, particularly in low light.
All of them are great cameras though. You literally can't go wrong with any of the new 1" sensors, you just get different trade-offs.
Aug 17, 2018 09:41:12 #
j.l.h wrote:
I use the Panasonic GX-8 for a lightweight travel ... (show quote)
I have the same lenses but use an Olympus EPL-5, I use the 20mm prime mostly, it's a great lens and that combination will fit into my jacket pocket easily.
Aug 17, 2018 09:54:07 #
peterg
Loc: Santa Rosa, CA
As a Sony RX100m3 user, I recommend an RX100m5 or m6, depending on the features you want and budget.
Aug 17, 2018 10:41:20 #
I always carry my Panasonic DMC-ZS40. It will easily drop in a pocket and I have gotten some great photos with it.
Even when toting my Nikon DSLR or a larger bridge camera, the DMC-ZS40 goes with me. It is especially useful for quick, unexpected photo opportunities.
Even when toting my Nikon DSLR or a larger bridge camera, the DMC-ZS40 goes with me. It is especially useful for quick, unexpected photo opportunities.
Aug 17, 2018 11:28:12 #
Grumpy wrote:
Thinking of buying a lightweight compact for those... (show quote)
I love my LUMIX ZS 100! It is a great little travel camera, and I shot some (for me) great low light shots. The ZS200 has come out, but from what I read, one is better off buying the ZS100 and you probably might get it for less now.
Aug 17, 2018 11:30:16 #
Aug 17, 2018 12:56:42 #
bsprague wrote:
"I think it is between the Sony RX100 series and Panasonic TZ200"
That's about what I wrote above. The ZS100 has less zoom, but a faster lens lens than the newer ZS200. ("TZ" and "ZS" change, depending on where you live!)
Based on results, not features, I think if I was spending money on a pocket camera right now it would be the ZS100. That said, one of the later versions in the Sony series would not be disappointing!
That's about what I wrote above. The ZS100 has less zoom, but a faster lens lens than the newer ZS200. ("TZ" and "ZS" change, depending on where you live!)
Based on results, not features, I think if I was spending money on a pocket camera right now it would be the ZS100. That said, one of the later versions in the Sony series would not be disappointing!
I wound up with the ZS100. I wanted one that fits a pocket, has a viewfinder, zoom range, and a larger than a 1/2.3 sensor for better low light and IQ. The 200 wasn't available at the time.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.