Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
RAW can save your bacon
Page <prev 2 of 2
Aug 16, 2018 11:38:33   #
BebuLamar
 
I only buy bacon raw.

Reply
Aug 16, 2018 11:56:39   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 

--Bob

BebuLamar wrote:
I only buy bacon raw.

Reply
Aug 16, 2018 12:34:31   #
Ron Dial Loc: Cuenca, Ecuador
 
You will find some photographers on this site, believe that modern JPEGS are just as good as RAW. (which they aren't). I realize this will probably inflame some opinions, but it is what it is.

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2018 12:45:06   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
You'll also find that some on this site believe that RAW and PS are so you can "fix" things, with the same inflammation as your statement induces.
--Bob
Ron Dial wrote:
You will find some photographers on this site, believe that modern JPEGS are just as good as RAW. (which they aren't). I realize this will probably inflame some opinions, but it is what it is.

Reply
Aug 16, 2018 12:47:06   #
mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey
 
Ron Dial wrote:
You will find some photographers on this site, believe that modern JPEGS are just as good as RAW. (which they aren't). I realize this will probably inflame some opinions, but it is what it is.


Some people also think the world is flat, that astronauts never landed on the moon, and that dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time. Many people adhere to belief systems which prevent them from accepting conflicting ideas regardless of any evidence.

Reply
Aug 16, 2018 17:21:25   #
Harry0 Loc: Gardena, Cal
 
Sometimes editing JPGs leaves you open to the "XEROX" effect. Open edit close- you now have a copy with a little mpre loss. Do it again- a little more loss. Every so often someone tries this out- open edit close the same file 100 times. Looks like crapola.
Some of us know our limitations. The shot I took is not the shot I wanted. RAW lets me adjust it easier and more precisely. I was in Tahoe, and shot the lake at noon30 'cause that's when I had the time. I made it a sunset- and moved that sun and cloud all over the place until I was happy.
https://tinyurl.com/y93se92a

Reply
Aug 16, 2018 17:49:18   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
One doesn't need to edit for the degradation to occur. If one opens a .jpg file and just saves it, there will be changes done to it.
--Bob
Harry0 wrote:
Sometimes editing JPGs leaves you open to the "XEROX" effect. Open edit close- you now have a copy with a little mpre loss. Do it again- a little more loss. Every so often someone tries this out- open edit close the same file 100 times. Looks like crapola.
Some of us know our limitations. The shot I took is not the shot I wanted. RAW lets me adjust it easier and more precisely. I was in Tahoe, and shot the lake at noon30 'cause that's when I had the time. I made it a sunset- and moved that sun and cloud all over the place until I was happy.
https://tinyurl.com/y93se92a
Sometimes editing JPGs leaves you open to the &quo... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Aug 16, 2018 21:20:14   #
thrash50
 
I shoot RAW + jpeg, and not by any means an expert in editing.
The jpegs can be opened, and edited, in any simple photo editor, I'm starting to have some success with RAW editors. I generally export my finished RAW edits, as Tiff. Tiff is easier to resize, if needed.
I actually just wanted to thank the photographers for there examples on this post, they are quite inspiring.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.