McKinneyMike wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-judge-says-mueller-case-against-russian-company-134826531.html
HURDLE? Dude wastes time and money on foreign entities that he will never be able to try and convict. Not a single American has been indicted or tried for collision.
EyeSawYou wrote:
HURDLE? Dude wastes time and money on foreign entities that he will never be able to try and convict. Not a single American has been indicted or tried for collision.
Collusion is not a crime dumbass! You also need to inform the Orange Buffoon of this as well.
McKinneyMike wrote:
Collusion is not a crime dumbass! You also need to inform the Orange Buffoon of this as well.
We on this side already know this moron, it is YOUR side that have been yelling collusion you fool. lol
McKinneyMike wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-judge-says-mueller-case-against-russian-company-134826531.html
What hurdle is that? Do you actually see a hurdle here?
It's pretty standard for the defense to go through various motions to get a case dismissed for wh**ever reason. It's done all the time. Companies don't like having to spend money defending themselves.
The nest step will be discovery and this should be very interesting. Mueller is digging his own grave. And still nothing to do with Trump, collusion or wh**ever.
Pegasus wrote:
What hurdle is that? Do you actually see a hurdle here?
It's pretty standard for the defense to go through various motions to get a case dismissed for wh**ever reason. It's done all the time. Companies don't like having to spend money defending themselves.
The nest step will be discovery and this should be very interesting. Mueller is digging his own grave. And still nothing to do with Trump, collusion or wh**ever.
They have to be charged as conspirators in order for others to be charged with conspiring with them.
EyeSawYou wrote:
We on this side already know this moron, it is YOUR side that have been yelling collusion you fool. lol
I am not the one saying it over and over dips**t. The only people talking about it is Trump and you.
McKinneyMike wrote:
I am not the one saying it over and over dips**t. The only people talking about it is Trump and you.
Man you are more stupid than I thought before tonight, read what I said moron.
"it is
YOUR side that have been yelling collusion.."
EyeSawYou wrote:
Man you are more stupid than I thought before tonight, read what I said moron.
"it is YOUR side that have been yelling collusion.."
You must listen to a lot of FOX, as I never hear anyone talking about collusion, other than Trump, you and other Republicans. At this point we all know collusion is not a crime. You keep trying.... Lord Bigly has the market cornered on "No Collusion"....
WRONG
We have stated over and over it is conspiracy and obstruction of justice when it comes to the president. That is why he won't testify!
Mueller will probably have to subpoena him, Rudy will go nuts, his real legal team will quit, his kids will take a plea and toss him under the bus and Melania will grab a bunch of cash and hide it in a Romanian bank, and he will get an outfit to match his hair!
McKinneyMike wrote:
You must listen to a lot of FOX, as I never hear anyone talking about collusion, other than Trump, you and other Republicans. At this point we all know collusion is not a crime. You keep trying.... Lord Bigly has the market cornered on "No Collusion"....
Oh MickeyMike, you disappoint me greatly. I actually thought you were somewhat rational and unlike thom w, dljen, old sarg, Dirtbag and many other I also thought you had some intellectual honesty. Are you really going to tell me that Russian collusion was not the prime motivation for the special counsel and the unceasing attacks on president Trump since the morning after the e******ns?
The one saving grace in your post quoted above is your use of the present tense as in "...I never hear anyone..." This could mean that you no longer hear anyone talking about and that you now acknowledge the whole special counsel was a travesty. However, I will point out that you are either lying (gasp), or ignorant of current affairs. The l*****t collusion nuts have been pushing the recent restatements of denial about the Trump Tower meeting as "proof" that there was collusion, that the meeting was illegal and that Don Jr. should be thrown in jail. Dirtbag even posted about it, breathlessly stating that Don Jr. was going to jail after his father threw him under the bus.
So, please excuse me if I view your comment with a jaundiced eye as I now realize that you may be just an ordinary liar like thom w and his ilk.
Please say it ain't so.
You should know that the current thinking, with all the revelations that are now coming out, is that the Trump Tower meeting was a setup by Glen Simpson to try to pin stuff on the Trump campaign. It failed. And it also raises other issues against the investigators.
Pegasus wrote:
Oh MickeyMike, you disappoint me greatly. I actually thought you were somewhat rational and unlike thom w, dljen, old sarg, Dirtbag and many other I also thought you had some intellectual honesty. Are you really going to tell me that Russian collusion was not the prime motivation for the special counsel and the unceasing attacks on president Trump since the morning after the e******ns?
The one saving grace in your post quoted above is your use of the present tense as in "...I never hear anyone..." This could mean that you no longer hear anyone talking about and that you now acknowledge the whole special counsel was a travesty. However, I will point out that you are either lying (gasp), or ignorant of current affairs. The l*****t collusion nuts have been pushing the recent restatements of denial about the Trump Tower meeting as "proof" that there was collusion, that the meeting was illegal and that Don Jr. should be thrown in jail. Dirtbag even posted about it, breathlessly stating that Don Jr. was going to jail after his father threw him under the bus.
So, please excuse me if I view your comment with a jaundiced eye as I now realize that you may be just an ordinary liar like thom w and his ilk.
Please say it ain't so.
You should know that the current thinking, with all the revelations that are now coming out, is that the Trump Tower meeting was a setup by Glen Simpson to try to pin stuff on the Trump campaign. It failed. And it also raises other issues against the investigators.
Oh MickeyMike, you disappoint me greatly. I actua... (
show quote)
PeggySue how many times has Trump tweeted about collusion over the past 24 hrs??? 3 times just in the past 12hrs. What will the over and under be for a full 24hr period?
McKinneyMike wrote:
PeggySue how many times has Trump tweeted about collusion over the past 24 hrs??? 3 times just in the past 12hrs. What will the over and under be for a full 24hr period?
If you think you're insulting me by referring to me as a female, you're sadly mistaken and you display your misogynistic contempt for women.
Trump is talking about collusion because that was the center of the witch hunt and it has now fallen apart totally.
The MSM refuses to acknowledge that fact, along with virtually all other successes and accomplishments of the Trump administration. They simply ignore all that and concentrate of wh**ever negative they find, or create out of whole cloth.
This strategy worked fine with past Republican administrations, notably Bush 43 who steadfastly refused to defend himself and his entourage.
President Trump is a very different president and he uses Twitter to play the MSM like the biased fools they are. It seems more people pay attention to tweets than wh**ever crap the MSM produces and President Trump sets the tone.
You can see how effective that is as you and that i***t, old sarg, now swear up and down there was no collusion.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.