Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Long Exposures
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jul 30, 2012 07:47:06   #
boroboy51 Loc: middle earth
 
I'm no expert but my experiments with long ex have been done in the late evening with a cpl. I have had some pleasing results.

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 08:33:09   #
DaveJS Loc: Philadelphia, PA area
 
I bought a 10 stop filter a few weeks ago and was only yesterday able to start using it. I was just playing around with some shots but I love it. I'm dying to go in to the city (Philadelphia) and take shots. I had people walking all over the frame and none of them showed up in the pic. Witht he filter came a little cheat sheet, it said if your normal exposure was X then with the filter it would now be Y.

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 09:00:09   #
nikonshooter Loc: Spartanburg, South Carolina
 
Luthien wrote:
I'd like to try long exposure photography for a change but every time I try my images turn out either over exposed or very dull.

Could anyone give me some tips and point me in the right direction please?


If you happen to shoot Nikon and for those who do, you can use the "Multiple Exposure" option. Just choose in your menu. This will allow you to stack, in camera multiple exposures, I use 10. If the scene is a waterfall, the only thing that is usually moving is the water, so it will process silky smooth. These shots are not bracketed....same exposure taken multiple times. Trash it if it is windy and you might as well trash the ND as well, when your waterfall is surrounded by trees and stuff.

Personally, I don't like the look a ND filter gives to a scene but after early morning until late afternoon you need it unless your camera is Nikon and you use the ME option. Also, when I can, I want to use the sweet spot for a lens (best F stop for a particular lens.......unfortunately you have to stop down to a point you will lose this advantage - unless your camera has the ME option. Huge advantage!!!

So, Nikon shooters, set your lens to it's best F/Stop for the scene and your lens, elect the Multiple exposure option, set to 10 shots, fire away and walla! All done with no ND filter.

Reply
 
 
Jul 30, 2012 09:52:13   #
phil9945 Loc: British Columbia, Canada
 
I use a free app called Long Time on my iPhone to determine exposure ... it works very well

Phil

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 10:13:59   #
nikonshooter Loc: Spartanburg, South Carolina
 
phil9945 wrote:
I use a free app called Long Time on my iPhone to determine exposure ... it works very well

Phil


Great app! Thanks for sharing

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 10:48:05   #
IanC Loc: Northumberland UK
 
Took this one in bright sunlight. F11, 1.5seconds ISO100.
With an ND4 & ND16 filter attached.



Reply
Jul 30, 2012 10:55:07   #
I STOP TO SHOOT Loc: By the No. CA Sea
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Luthien wrote:
I'd like to try long exposure photography for a change but every time I try my images turn out either over exposed or very dull.

Could anyone give me some tips and point me in the right direction please?

If you don't have decent ND filters, you'll need some. Check here, too. http://www.alexwisephotography.net/blog/2010/02/16/guide-to-daytime-long-exposures/

Jerry 41: Have you taken pict. with these filters? I love the effect of them...

Reply
 
 
Jul 30, 2012 11:05:57   #
paulw Loc: nottinghamshire
 
all you need to do is USE aTRIPOD and think about stopping as much light getting to your sensor as possible whether it be small aperture low ISO low light conditions ie dawn/dusk or a filter it takes a shortish exposure time to blur moving water just experiment they now manufacture fader ND filters that adjust the amount of light just by turning the filter ring they are great saves you buying several pieces of glass and stacking them in front of your lens less glass sharper image

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 12:11:09   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Waterfalls in full sun require a CPF (Circular Polarizing Filter - it is NOT a lens) or a Neutral Density filter, to elongate exposure. Small waterfalls in shade can be handled with only low ISO & small aperture.


I agree that it is a filter and not a lens. My question is, how come none of mine say CPF but say CPL? I am asking because I want to use terms that are recognizable by all. Is this a manufacturer thing or is the more common term CPL that all would understand?

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 12:55:58   #
coco1964 Loc: Winsted Mn
 
Luthien wrote:
Thanks everyone. I'll start experimenting this week!
Don't go out and spend a mint on filters and other equipment you don't need. Work in SP with a slow shutterspeed and let the camera adjust your aperture. There are members here who will help you W/O buying extra equipment. A big mistake with waterfalls is that water starts looking like milk and no longer water. Didn't catch if you have a tripod or not but that is a must. Experiment with what you have and you'll attain the results you desire.........

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 13:01:36   #
Alvis Loc: Chatham Ontario Canada
 
try using a neutral density filter nd4 is a good place to start,then shoot at different shutter speeds and aperture combos till you get something you like......here is a sample of such a thing.....this is a shot of waves 2-3 feet high crashing...



Reply
 
 
Jul 30, 2012 13:26:01   #
Jer Loc: Mesa, Arizona
 
What were you trying to photograph? What was the normal camera setting. The one you might use to take a regular picture. For example, iso 100, F/16, 1/125 sec. If we know that then we can tell you an equavalant exposure for a longer shutter speed and if you need neutral density filters.

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 13:56:09   #
IanC Loc: Northumberland UK
 
Here is a shot with no filters. Just F11 for 0.5seconds.

Very dull day thuogh
Very dull day thuogh...

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 14:05:51   #
PhotoArtsLA Loc: Boynton Beach
 
Luthien wrote:
bullfrogs wrote:
Luthien
Can you elaborate further on what type of long exposure photos you desire to take. What venue? Astrophotography etc ???
Bullfrogs


I'd like to try the 'soft' water effect, and night exposures of my city skyline.
I only really want to get a feel for it at the moment though, to get some practise in.
Eventually I would love to do astrophotography!


ND filters, apart from shooting the sun, are not needed for astrophotography. Fast lenses are required, or, an equatorial clock drive for longer time exposures or for shooting through a telescope.

If you are getting underexposure with your ND filter, you must calculate your exposure. Take a few shots (bracketed) without the ND, note the exposure which looks best, then add the ND and change the shutter speed (longer and longer exposures) to compensate for the f/stop differential.

Here is a chart for reference.
Here is a chart for reference....

This is a daylight exposure, fast shutter speed.
This is a daylight exposure, fast shutter speed....

Reply
Jul 30, 2012 14:06:13   #
marty wild Loc: England
 
Before you run out and spend Dollar try the highest F-stop and work to a lower number. A tripod and cable release or wireless transmitter is all so required to stop camera shake if you have a light compensation button review your manual to see how it works. When thats in place, it's play time! look on my flickr page, page 9. I have had some good results
Luthien wrote:
I'd like to try long exposure photography for a change but every time I try my images turn out either over exposed or very dull.

Could anyone give me some tips and point me in the right direction please?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.