Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Astronomical Photography Forum
Additional Solar work from July 30th session
Aug 3, 2018 11:49:52   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
This is uncropped but pixel boasted to get additional data to bump and grind on.
Shot with the Lunt 60mm Pressure tuned solar scope and Celestron 236M monochrome CMOS camera.
This is a 2 minute video processed in AutoStakkert2 using 310 frames of a 3150 frame video.
Wavelets lightly tweaked in Registax6 and color enhancement and pixel boast to 400 Pixels per inch in Photoshop CC.
All in all not to bad.
Jim


(Download)

Reply
Aug 4, 2018 13:49:21   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is uncropped but pixel boasted to get additional data to bump and grind on.
Shot with the Lunt 60mm Pressure tuned solar scope and Celestron 236M monochrome CMOS camera.
This is a 2 minute video processed in AutoStakkert2 using 310 frames of a 3150 frame video.
Wavelets lightly tweaked in Registax6 and color enhancement and pixel boast to 400 Pixels per inch in Photoshop CC.
All in all not to bad.
Jim

I like the masked surface. bwa

Reply
Aug 5, 2018 00:38:40   #
SonnyE Loc: Communist California, USA
 
Interesting as it looks like a perfect moment in a total eclipse.
Sortta, kinda, well I think.....

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Aug 6, 2018 02:22:48   #
northcoast42 Loc: Puget Sound, Washington
 
Nice! Love the detail on the prominences.
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is uncropped but pixel boasted to get additional data to bump and grind on.
Shot with the Lunt 60mm Pressure tuned solar scope and Celestron 236M monochrome CMOS camera.
This is a 2 minute video processed in AutoStakkert2 using 310 frames of a 3150 frame video.
Wavelets lightly tweaked in Registax6 and color enhancement and pixel boast to 400 Pixels per inch in Photoshop CC.
All in all not to bad.
Jim

Reply
Aug 6, 2018 22:15:17   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
bwana wrote:
I like the masked surface. bwa


Thank you.
I have done this on a few others that I really wanted to highlight the prominences on.
Slowly I am getting better.
Jim

Reply
Aug 6, 2018 22:16:39   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
SonnyE wrote:
Interesting as it looks like a perfect moment in a total eclipse.
Sortta, kinda, well I think.....


Just missing all of the fun bright shiny stuff. So nahhhhh not really..

Thank you though.
Jim

Reply
Aug 6, 2018 22:17:02   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
northcoast42 wrote:
Nice! Love the detail on the prominences.


Thank you very much.
Jim

Reply
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2018 22:04:49   #
kelso007 Loc: Circle Pines Minnesota
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is uncropped but pixel boasted to get additional data to bump and grind on.
Shot with the Lunt 60mm Pressure tuned solar scope and Celestron 236M monochrome CMOS camera.
This is a 2 minute video processed in AutoStakkert2 using 310 frames of a 3150 frame video.
Wavelets lightly tweaked in Registax6 and color enhancement and pixel boast to 400 Pixels per inch in Photoshop CC.
All in all not to bad.
Jim

I don't know much about astrophotography but I really like this photo.
Dave

Reply
Aug 8, 2018 22:21:36   #
bwana Loc: Bergen, Alberta, Canada
 
Albuqshutterbug wrote:
This is uncropped but pixel boasted to get additional data to bump and grind on.
Shot with the Lunt 60mm Pressure tuned solar scope and Celestron 236M monochrome CMOS camera.
This is a 2 minute video processed in AutoStakkert2 using 310 frames of a 3150 frame video.
Wavelets lightly tweaked in Registax6 and color enhancement and pixel boast to 400 Pixels per inch in Photoshop CC.
All in all not to bad.
Jim

Is there something you're doing with AutoStakkert2(or 3) that makes it work!? If I tried to stack 10% (or probably less than 50%) of a video's frames, the result would totally fall apart, i.e.: it would look like a Picasso painting with pieces chopped out, obvious join lines, different color hunks, etc. I also have trouble simply keeping 3 running with about 50% of my attempted runs crashing. It simply disappears, no warning, no error messages, just kaput, gone!

I like AutoStakkert's interface and approach to alignment and stacking BUT I've almost given up using it due to its instabilities...

bwa

Reply
Aug 9, 2018 00:40:11   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
kelso007 wrote:
I don't know much about astrophotography but I really like this photo.
Dave


Thank you very much.
I try different things and bounce them off the wall here.


Reply
Aug 9, 2018 00:47:13   #
Albuqshutterbug Loc: Albuquerque NM
 
bwana wrote:
Is there something you're doing with AutoStakkert2(or 3) that makes it work!? If I tried to stack 10% (or probably less than 50%) of a video's frames, the result would totally fall apart, i.e.: it would look like a Picasso painting with pieces chopped out, obvious join lines, different color hunks, etc. I also have trouble simply keeping 3 running with about 50% of my attempted runs crashing. It simply disappears, no warning, no error messages, just kaput, gone!

I like AutoStakkert's interface and approach to alignment and stacking BUT I've almost given up using it due to its instabilities...

bwa
Is there something you're doing with AutoStakkert2... (show quote)


Here are some screen shots of one of my sessions.
They might help.
Also make sure you are using 2.6.8 since that is the most stable.
Jim


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Astronomical Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.