Atmospheric haze could be an issue.
DWHart24 wrote:
Getting a nice sharp image of the moon isn't easy unless you have a decent long lens. This is one of my favorites, shot with a Sigma 50-500mm lens. You can click on the photo and scroll down to see the EXIF data. As others have stated above, having a sturdy tripod and remote release play a big role.
Super moon II by
David Hart, on Flickr
Getting a nice sharp image of the moon isn't easy ... (
show quote)
Wow -- and shot though a 50-500 zoom. Sigma really is under-rated.
Just wanted to add one thing to all the good suggestions made above: don't forget to remove your polarizing filter.
A polarizer can be helpful for photographing the moon during the day, but at night it just darkens the image.
Also, don't expect great shots if the air is hazey or smokey -- especially when the moon is low in the sky.
And you'll get better shots late at night, after the air has cooled down.
Dark shots are underexposed. Light shots are overexposed. Shutter speed is too slow. Lens is not long enough. Focus is not at infinity.
toxdoc42 wrote:
I went out last night and saw a beautiful moon. I took a fair number of photos and was never able to achieve the caliber of shots that are shown here. I wonder if this is a limitation of my equipment or my technique?
the photos were shot on 2 different days, using various techniques as can be seen in the details.
This was shot with the modest Sigma C 150- 600mm lens 1/160 @f/11 ISO 100, and cropped to make an A4 print. Tripod used.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.