Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
For being so innocent "he doth protest loudly".....
Jul 23, 2018 10:11:59   #
McKinneyMike Loc: Texas
 
Say it enough his brainwashed followers will believe it....... Hey Donnie Doll, maybe offer some proof for a change!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-carter-page-documents-show-doj-fbi-105103771.html

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 10:34:38   #
Pegasus Loc: Texas Gulf Coast
 
McKinneyMike wrote:
Say it enough his brainwashed followers will believe it....... Hey Donnie Doll, maybe offer some proof for a change!

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-carter-page-documents-show-doj-fbi-105103771.html


Boy are you confused. I also notice that you do not understand or abide by the constitution.

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 10:42:44   #
McKinneyMike Loc: Texas
 
Pegasus wrote:
Boy are you confused. I also notice that you do not understand or abide by the constitution.


I never realized one must follow your personal interpretation of the Constitution. I guess the Constitution is like the Bible. Much is written, much is left to interpretation. In the case of the Constitution, it would seem to be the quality of one's argument and the makeup of the SC at that time.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2018 11:42:25   #
Pegasus Loc: Texas Gulf Coast
 
McKinneyMike wrote:
I never realized one must follow your personal interpretation of the Constitution. I guess the Constitution is like the Bible. Much is written, much is left to interpretation. In the case of the Constitution, it would seem to be the quality of one's argument and the makeup of the SC at that time.


Yeah, I was waiting for a snarky remark from you that plainly shows you do not understand the constitution.

Let me elaborate.

You are commenting on the fact that President Trump is proclaiming his innocence about anything to do with collusion with Russia. That's one item, and it must be viewed in the context that virtually all Dems and MSM (same thing) are claiming he is guilty of it.

Which brings us to your second point, where you are asking that President Trump provide proof that he did not collude with Russia. First of all, you can't prove a negative; anybody with a functioning brain knows that. It's even taught in schools, or used to be. Second, our constitution places the burden of proof on the accuser and that's what you don't get. You can't go up to someone and accuse them of something and then say, prove to me that you did not do what I said you did.

President Trump does not have to prove that he didn't collude with Russia; in fact I just don't see how he could do that to everyone's satisfaction, there would always be conspiracy theorists who say we didn't look deeply enough.

The burden of proof is on the accusers and so far, these accusers have got nothing, less than nothing. We know there was collusion with Russia but it was all on the side of the Democrats. But we're not looking at that. Yet.

I notice that the Dems have been extraordinarily quiet about the Lisa Page deposition in Congress last week. This means she was extremely effective and took the air out of the democrats tires.

And remember, if anyone had anything on Trump collusion with Russia, Adam Schiff would have leaked it by now and that includes the "Mueller" witch hunt.

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 12:36:58   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
McKinneyMike wrote:
I never realized one must follow your personal interpretation of the Constitution. I guess the Constitution is like the Bible. Much is written, much is left to interpretation. In the case of the Constitution, it would seem to be the quality of one's argument and the makeup of the SC at that time.


Read a book, specifically the FEDERALUST PAPERS.

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 12:37:51   #
Pegasus Loc: Texas Gulf Coast
 
LWW wrote:
Read a book, specifically the FEDERALIST PAPERS.


I don't think he can.

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 13:01:53   #
SharpShooter Loc: NorCal
 
Pegasus wrote:
Yeah, I was waiting for a snarky remark from you that plainly shows you do not understand the constitution.

Let me elaborate.

You are commenting on the fact that President Trump is proclaiming his innocence about anything to do with collusion with Russia. That's one item, and it must be viewed in the context that virtually all Dems and MSM (same thing) are claiming he is guilty of it.

Which brings us to your second point, where you are asking that President Trump provide proof that he did not collude with Russia. First of all, you can't prove a negative; anybody with a functioning brain knows that. It's even taught in schools, or used to be. Second, our constitution places the burden of proof on the accuser and that's what you don't get. You can't go up to someone and accuse them of something and then say, prove to me that you did not do what I said you did.

President Trump does not have to prove that he didn't collude with Russia; in fact I just don't see how he could do that to everyone's satisfaction, there would always be conspiracy theorists who say we didn't look deeply enough.

The burden of proof is on the accusers and so far, these accusers have got nothing, less than nothing. We know there was collusion with Russia but it was all on the side of the Democrats. But we're not looking at that. Yet.

I notice that the Dems have been extraordinarily quiet about the Lisa Page deposition in Congress last week. This means she was extremely effective and took the air out of the democrats tires.

And remember, if anyone had anything on Trump collusion with Russia, Adam Schiff would have leaked it by now and that includes the "Mueller" witch hunt.
Yeah, I was waiting for a snarky remark from you t... (show quote)


Ahhh, another COWARD with a big mouth!!!
Attach ANYTHING from ANYWHERE that say that PUTOS colluded??? You can’t because it doesn’t exist. Tramps need to proclaim innocence is his tactic to buy the ignorant. And you’ve been bought and bent over!
That there was meddling by Russia has been 100% established by ALL 17 of our security agencies.
The Mueller investigation is purely to establish whether ANY Americans had knowledge of that meddling, when, how, participated or in any way facilitated the meddling and if there were any laws broken.
And NOBODY outside of the investigation knows what they’ve come up with. Certainly not the ignorant like you.
Go turn on Fox News and renew your subscription the the BreiTURD so you can shoot up your daily dose of exaggerated f**e reality!!!! YOU COWARD
SS

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2018 14:31:22   #
Pegasus Loc: Texas Gulf Coast
 
SharpShooter wrote:
Ahhh, another COWARD with a big mouth!!!
Attach ANYTHING from ANYWHERE that say that PUTOS colluded??? You can’t because it doesn’t exist. Tramps need to proclaim innocence is his tactic to buy the ignorant. And you’ve been bought and bent over!
That there was meddling by Russia has been 100% established by ALL 17 of our security agencies.
The Mueller investigation is purely to establish whether ANY Americans had knowledge of that meddling, when, how, participated or in any way facilitated the meddling and if there were any laws broken.
And NOBODY outside of the investigation knows what they’ve come up with. Certainly not the ignorant like you.
Go turn on Fox News and renew your subscription the the BreiTURD so you can shoot up your daily dose of exaggerated f**e reality!!!! YOU COWARD
SS
Ahhh, another COWARD with a big mouth!!! br Attach... (show quote)



Oh, lowly sharpshooter, you are such a silly.

Please explain to me what you mean by "Attach ANYTHING from ANYWHERE that say that PUTOS colluded??? You can’t because it doesn’t exist."
What does that even mean?

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 16:27:56   #
McKinneyMike Loc: Texas
 
Pegasus wrote:
Yeah, I was waiting for a snarky remark from you that plainly shows you do not understand the constitution.

Let me elaborate.

You are commenting on the fact that President Trump is proclaiming his innocence about anything to do with collusion with Russia. That's one item, and it must be viewed in the context that virtually all Dems and MSM (same thing) are claiming he is guilty of it.

Which brings us to your second point, where you are asking that President Trump provide proof that he did not collude with Russia. First of all, you can't prove a negative; anybody with a functioning brain knows that. It's even taught in schools, or used to be. Second, our constitution places the burden of proof on the accuser and that's what you don't get. You can't go up to someone and accuse them of something and then say, prove to me that you did not do what I said you did.

President Trump does not have to prove that he didn't collude with Russia; in fact I just don't see how he could do that to everyone's satisfaction, there would always be conspiracy theorists who say we didn't look deeply enough.

The burden of proof is on the accusers and so far, these accusers have got nothing, less than nothing. We know there was collusion with Russia but it was all on the side of the Democrats. But we're not looking at that. Yet.

I notice that the Dems have been extraordinarily quiet about the Lisa Page deposition in Congress last week. This means she was extremely effective and took the air out of the democrats tires.

And remember, if anyone had anything on Trump collusion with Russia, Adam Schiff would have leaked it by now and that includes the "Mueller" witch hunt.
Yeah, I was waiting for a snarky remark from you t... (show quote)


You truly are a legend in your own mind.

Reply
Jul 23, 2018 17:52:14   #
Pegasus Loc: Texas Gulf Coast
 
McKinneyMike wrote:
You truly are a legend in your own mind.


I was right, wasn't I? You are totally predictable.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.