SusanFromVermont wrote:
I was in your position a number of years ago - a Manfrotto tripod and the head had its clamp built in. When I decided to start using RRS, I wanted to start small [$ was an issue...], so I wanted to purchase their clamp and camera plate. Talked to people at RRS and was told how to make that happen. Not exactly sure now, I don't remember everything, but the new clamp was attatched to the Manfrotto clamp. I believe it was done by attaching the RRS clamp to the Manfrotto plate being held in the Manfrotto clamp! From there I ended up with all RRS - Tripod, B-55 ballhead, plate for my camera. Heavy-duty stuff, and that first clamp and plate I bought exuded an aura of quality when I took them out of the package! I've never been disappointed with anything from RRS. Now I have RRS L-plates on both my cameras.
The L-plate from RRS has been made to fit a particular camera, and it is not just to prevent rotation. It also has openings on the vertical side that allow you to access ports for accessories [such as the wired remote shutter release] without hassle. The reason why Rotation is an issue is because the camera and lens combination may be within the declared limits for the tripod head, but not all manufacturers will sufficiently account for that extra pressure [I think it is called "shear force"] that occurs with longer lens length and with tipping the camera up or down so it is no longer centered over the tripod. As has already been mentioned, the L-plate will also be added protection for the camera. This I know from personal experience. Took a nasty fall, camera was on the strap around my neck. The L-bracket got a "ding" in it right on the corner. If it was not there, the possibility the camera itself would be damaged was very much higher. I also had the lens hood on the lens, so no damage there either! Only damage was to me, but luckily it was messy but only superficial.
Head slippage was also an issue I had. Similar to the reasons for rotation. I love the B-55, heavy duty ball head from RRS. Yes, a gimbal head would be better for a large lens, because it makes it easier to move the lens quickly. The main reason for any difficulty with a large lens on a ball head seems to me to be because of its weight, but many people are so used to it that it does not bother them. I am planning to buy a gimbal head, but don't have a very long lens yet!
If you are considering purchasing a new tripod in the future, keep in mind that a very good tripod is not likely to be any less than ~$500 [RRS start at $835 for full-size carbon fiber] . And when you have spent more than that for each of [or most of] your cameras and lenses, it is not unreasonable to buy the best you can for that added quality and stability. Nothing worse than a tripod tipping over because the camera/lens combination makes it unstable.
I was in your position a number of years ago - a M... (
show quote)
Susan, than you for a beautifully written and meaningful response. I want to do this right because I don’t want to have to do it again in a year or two and your points are very helpful. I only have the one lens that I consider big and it is not as big as the long primes. I don’t find it all that heavy to work with as long as it is on a tripod. It’s too much for me to hand hold. If a gimbal is in my future it is a ways off. Thank you again.