Why I switched camera brands
Jul 30, 2012 23:05:50 #
[quote=tainkc]
I would agree. When you see something on wikipedia that says 'citation needed', it usually means they don't have any facts, just hearsay or opinion.
tinosa wrote:
Thank you, for getting me to read reviews on the A... (show quote)
I would agree. When you see something on wikipedia that says 'citation needed', it usually means they don't have any facts, just hearsay or opinion.
Jul 30, 2012 23:29:14 #
[quote=bawlmer]
At least my Sony A57 writes to the card just as fast as any Canon I had. The bit of light reflected to the viewfinder does not seem to be any problem as far as I can see. I took a 6 frame pic at night, in camera HDR processing, it took ~4 seconds to process. (how long will it take you to process in PP?) The ISO was 2000, 1/125 f/1.8. So I am not sure who wrote the Wic. entry on the Translucent Mirror series, but don't think they were very familiar with the camera before writing that, OR, bias. Ok, I'll just post the pic.
tainkc wrote:
quote=tinosa Thank you, for getting me to read re... (show quote)
At least my Sony A57 writes to the card just as fast as any Canon I had. The bit of light reflected to the viewfinder does not seem to be any problem as far as I can see. I took a 6 frame pic at night, in camera HDR processing, it took ~4 seconds to process. (how long will it take you to process in PP?) The ISO was 2000, 1/125 f/1.8. So I am not sure who wrote the Wic. entry on the Translucent Mirror series, but don't think they were very familiar with the camera before writing that, OR, bias. Ok, I'll just post the pic.
O, and this is hand held. The fairis wheel was moving.
Jul 30, 2012 23:39:08 #
abenjohar
Loc: Minnesota
hi, could I ask where did you get that deal and how much the Sony A57 cost
about the lens are they spendy .
I was looking at a Nikon D5100 but did not get it because they are too BULKY and I like lite portable camera who does not weight 50 pound with the carry on bags
I would appreciated your opinion..
Albert
about the lens are they spendy .
I was looking at a Nikon D5100 but did not get it because they are too BULKY and I like lite portable camera who does not weight 50 pound with the carry on bags
I would appreciated your opinion..
Albert
Jul 30, 2012 23:45:46 #
abenjohar wrote:
hi, could I ask where did you get that deal and how much the Sony A57 cost
about the lens are they spendy .
I was looking at a Nikon D5100 but did not get it because they are too BULKY and I like lite portable camera who does not weight 50 pound with the carry on bags
I would appreciated your opinion..
Albert
about the lens are they spendy .
I was looking at a Nikon D5100 but did not get it because they are too BULKY and I like lite portable camera who does not weight 50 pound with the carry on bags
I would appreciated your opinion..
Albert
abenjohar, the a57 body with 2 lenses was 700.00 and I sold the lenses. I bought all Minolta lenses. They have some excellent lenses, as good as any. The cost on them is low, and you have to buy used, they are out of business. They are from the late 1980's to the late 1990's. Auto focus, and the Sony has "IS" in the body, so you don't need it in the lens. The Minolta lenses are light compared to most other brands. There is a forum just for Sony Alpha and Minolta lenses, they list the best lenses and there are 1000's of reviews. http://www.dyxum.com/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.