TimNY wrote:
Thanks Cliff and I see what you mean about 1. I was at 1/1250 sec, f 4 at 43mm. I could have opened to 2.8 or would it have accomplished the same thing if I backed up and zoomed in as far as the background is concerned?
IF you could have gone to 2.8 and zoomed in tighter on her, that would have helped. This image has such great potential! It is another case of, "the background is just as important as the subject."