Psergel wrote:
I've been shooting with a fairly large Canon kit. (two bodies and a number of "L" lenses).
Sometimes I'd like to have a camera with me without packing the heavy artillery and I'm seriously considering the Fujifilm X100F. It looks like a really great little camera but......it aint cheap.
Lots of people seem to love the X100 series and.......some do not.
It seems to be a very very different beast and I'm wondering if any of you who typically use a DSLR kit also have the X100F and how does it work out for you.
-Is it tough going between cameras?
-Do you feel that the X100F's fixed lens is too limiting?
-Are there any "must have" accessories that you'd recommend?
-Did you go for the Fujifilm leather case and is it worth the $$s
-Any other thoughts for someone about to pull the trigger.
I've been shooting with a fairly large Canon kit. ... (
show quote)
I use a Nikon FF, a Sony, a Canon and Fuji X100F & XT2. Over a short period of time, my go-to camera is the Fuji X100F. It is light, sort of pocketable, built like a tank, extremely flexible, totally unassuming (i.e. street shooting where subjects totally ingonore you because of the range-finder look, has a leaf shutter, works absolutely silently, extremely good built-in flash that fill- lights like a pro every time, has easily managed manual controls that feel right, has two digital zoom modes that are engaged with a touch on the lens ring & simply work so well no one knows they are in use, a built-in ND filter, and oh, did I mention, a fantastic JPEG engine that produces outstanding product in a selection of choices. It is not perfect but, it is good! You were concerned with a fixed lens. Here is a snippet from a recent professional reviewer regarding that topic:
“The Digital Teleconverter has two options: 50mm (equivalent) focal length and 75mm (equivalent) focal length. This significantly increases the versatility of the fixed-focal-length X100F! It’s almost as if the camera has three different lenses built in.
The 50mm option uses 16 megapixels of resolution from the sensor, which is still plenty (the X100S and X100T had “only” 16 megapixels). 16″ x 24″ prints are no problem, and, if you have a good quality file, you can make nice looking 2′ x 3′ prints. Unless you are pixel-peeping or making poster-sized prints, you’ll have a hard time distinguishing the 50mm Digital Teleconverter images from full resolution files.
The 75mm option uses 12 megapixels of resolution from the sensor, which is still plenty for most people and most uses (the original X100 had “only” 12 megapixels). 12″ x 18″ prints are no problem, and, if you have a good quality file, you can make nice looking 16″ x 24″ prints. Unless you are pixel-peeping or making large prints, nobody will be able to tell that you cut out half of the picture.
In a sense, it’s like getting an X100 with a 75mm lens and an X100T with a 50mm lens packaged with your X100F. As good as that sounds, it’s actually even better because of the advancements and updates the new camera has that the old ones don’t.”
Regarding your concern with two or more camera bodies. Yes, there is an adjustment factor, however, I have to say that the X100F is a snap to use and has re-ignited my love of photography. My guess is you may well experience what so many X100 series (and particularly X100F users) feel. The X100F becomes your go-to camera fo a majority of the time. I ditched the lens cover, and hood and use a simple UV lens filter for protection and experience no problems with flare as a result. I use a Lensmate Thumbrest, a larger eye cup, and a Cariz half leather case as accessories. To each his/her own. Hope this helps... Cheers!