Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Time for the Demo Rats to own up
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
Jun 20, 2018 06:54:24   #
tusketwedge Loc: Nova Scotia Canada
 
2002 ? wasn't George Bush president then. Just asking.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 06:59:16   #
JamesCurran Loc: Trenton ,NJ
 
skylane5sp wrote:
What "policy" was put into place by Trump and his minions? Do you have a copy or link to that specific Trump administration policy statement? No, you don't.
Do you get some sort of thrill posting your stupidity for all to see?


That law applies to *unaccompanied* children. Under in previous administrations found foster homes for approx 700 children a year, who arrived at the border with no parent around at all.

Trump (and Sessions, mostly) have decided to reject outright all claims of asylum --- so people who were following US law when they left their country, were suddenly breaking it when they arrived at the border. The parents are immediately arrested, making the children suddenly "unaccompanied". Now, due to the trump admin policy, they are dealing with 700 new children every 10 days.

The Dept of Health & Human Service admits it has no procedure in place for re-uniting children with their parents.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 07:41:25   #
steve03 Loc: long Lsland
 
Huey Driver wrote:
Think about it a few seconds maybe it will come to you. I'll help. What Trump is doing may not be popular but all he is doing is enforcing the law. Something Obama didn't seem to understand.


Isn't this the same excuse the N**i's used? I'm just enforcing the law?

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2018 08:06:33   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Your comment is disingenuous. You posted it to place blame. If you don't like what is going on then write the President it is his policy and on other. You and I were in Nam we saw families fleeing. Were those who were fleeing with thier children being responsible parents? I think so! These people are facing the same kinds of horror. If you have children and they were threatened with rape and kidnapping would you stay or flee to somewhere safer? I think you would.

the purpose of the bill did not address families. The bill was passed by a GOP Congress and signed by a GOP President.




Huey Driver wrote:
Good eye. I don't really care who's responsibility the bill is but the fact is through 8 years of Obama basically nothing was done to curb border crossings with children in tow. And when Trump tries do something about it by enforcing an existing law the Left tries to blame Trump and make us all feel guilty. Sorry I don't like what's going on with the kids but let's acknowledge who is at fault. The parents and those who v**ed to pass the law.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 08:08:47   #
usnpilot Loc: Ft Myers Fl
 
JamesCurran wrote:
That law applies to *unaccompanied* children. Under in previous administrations found foster homes for approx 700 children a year, who arrived at the border with no parent around at all.

Trump (and Sessions, mostly) have decided to reject outright all claims of asylum --- so people who were following US law when they left their country, were suddenly breaking it when they arrived at the border. The parents are immediately arrested, making the children suddenly "unaccompanied". Now, due to the trump admin policy, they are dealing with 700 new children every 10 days.

The Dept of Health & Human Service admits it has no procedure in place for re-uniting children with their parents.
That law applies to *unaccompanied* children. Un... (show quote)

The parents have the option of returning go their homeland with their children.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 08:50:18   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
JamesCurran wrote:
That law applies to *unaccompanied* children. Under in previous administrations found foster homes for approx 700 children a year, who arrived at the border with no parent around at all.

Trump (and Sessions, mostly) have decided to reject outright all claims of asylum --- so people who were following US law when they left their country, were suddenly breaking it when they arrived at the border. The parents are immediately arrested, making the children suddenly "unaccompanied". Now, due to the trump admin policy, they are dealing with 700 new children every 10 days.

The Dept of Health & Human Service admits it has no procedure in place for re-uniting children with their parents.
That law applies to *unaccompanied* children. Un... (show quote)



You are mistaken or you are outright lying. Prove that claims of asylum seekers are rejected for no reason. You can't it does not happen. Criminal i******s are not entering at ports of entry, thus there is no asylum.

The illegal children cost us over a billion dollars a year. That's just the illegal children.

Since April we have had 50,000 i******s a month pouring in. Another 10,000 in three months that are unaccompanied minors. By August we expect to have 30,000 illegal kids just since April. We pay for all of this.

It would seem to me that the prudent thing to do would be when i******s enter illegally, simply turn them back to the country they are entering from. Do not let them enter. If they are claiming asylum, follow the law regarding that. The law needs to be changed so we do not let them enter. That will keep the families together.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 09:09:53   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Frank T wrote:
Huey, Stop playing the Obama card, it just shows laziness and an unwilling attitude to take responsibility for the present.
Let's say that Obama was actually Satan and he held human sacrifices in the Oval Office if that makes you happy. Then let's talk about the present and the despicable policy put into place by Trump and his minions.
How does anything done in the past, excuse what Trump is doing now? Afterall, Hitler k**led six million Jews so it's okay to torture little children?
Really?
Huey, Stop playing the Obama card, it just shows l... (show quote)


I rarely comment on a******n, but it seems the Pro-A******n folks like scared Frank shouldnt say much about separating children from their parents..just saying..a bit hypocritical, dont ya think??

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2018 09:10:35   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
wilpharm wrote:
I rarely comment on a******n, but it seems the Pro-A******n folks like scared Frank shouldnt say much about separating children from their parents..just saying..a bit hypocritical, dont ya think??





Reply
Jun 20, 2018 09:26:27   #
Frank T Loc: New York, NY
 
wilpharm wrote:
I rarely comment on a******n, but it seems the Pro-A******n folks like scared Frank shouldnt say much about separating children from their parents..just saying..a bit hypocritical, dont ya think??


Seems to me that the Pro-Life people only give a s**t about the fetus. Once it's born you people couldn't care less about it. I'd say you're not a bit hypocritical, you're a whole lot hypocritical.
By the way farm boy. Come to NYC and I'll take you on a walk through Bedford Stuyvesant and we'll see who's scared.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 09:28:34   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Frank T wrote:
Seems to me that the Pro-Life people only give a s**t about the fetus. Once it's born you people couldn't care less about it. I'd say you're not a bit hypocritical, you're a whole lot hypocritical.
By the way farm boy. Come to NYC and I'll take you on a walk through Bedford Stuyvesant and we'll see who's scared.


come toMexico..would probably be a one-way ticket for your sorry ass, scared frank...

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 09:29:31   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
Frank T wrote:
Seems to me that the Pro-Life people only give a s**t about the fetus. Once it's born you people couldn't care less about it. I'd say you're not a bit hypocritical, you're a whole lot hypocritical.
By the way farm boy. Come to NYC and I'll take you on a walk through Bedford Stuyvesant and we'll see who's scared.


So, what is your point Frank? You say it is fine murdering babies that could survive outside the womb because, why???? Bedford Stuvyesant??

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2018 09:40:27   #
kd7eir Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
Huey Driver wrote:
Think about it a few seconds maybe it will come to you. I'll help. What Trump is doing may not be popular but all he is doing is enforcing the law. Something Obama didn't seem to understand.


Do you understand the meaning of "unaccompanied?" That law refers to housing children that came here UNACCOMPANIED by their parents.

AND it was passed during the BUSH administration.

I should stop asking how STUPID Republicans can be because you I***TS are taking it as a challenge!

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 09:50:54   #
Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa
 
kd7eir wrote:
Do you understand the meaning of "unaccompanied?" That law refers to housing children that came here UNACCOMPANIED by their parents.

AND it was passed during the BUSH administration.

I should stop asking how STUPID Republicans can be because you I***TS are taking it as a challenge!



We quit asking how stupid liberal progressives are a long time ago. We figured out how stupid they are on our own.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 10:02:28   #
FrumCA
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
"unaccompanied alien child"?

Since you obviously don't have basic reading sk**ls, have someone read read (2) (A), (B), (C) to you.

Reply
Jun 20, 2018 10:02:50   #
wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma
 
Elaine2025 wrote:
So, what is your point Frank? You say it is fine murdering babies that could survive outside the womb because, why???? Bedford Stuvyesant??


Actually the only thing I would be scared of in NY is being seen with scared frank...Im sure I would automatically be targeted as a perverted sexual d*****t...thanks for your offer , scared frank, but Ill just do it alone...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.