Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Canon 70-300mm vs Canon 100-400mm L lens
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 18, 2018 06:45:52   #
J-SPEIGHT Loc: Akron, Ohio
 
Sally D wrote:
I have previously posted a question about whether the problem with soft focus was due to the lens or me. Several of you mentioned that the Canon 70-300mm is soft when taken at 300mm and wide open. I did several test shots and found that if I dropped it down a stop or two and stuck with 200mm or less, my photos looked sharp. But I was continually frustrated when I tried to stretch it's length so I finally stepped up and bought a 100-400mmL IS II and couldn't be happier! We recently returned from a trip to Colorado where I used it for my favorite subject, wild horses. I'm attaching a couple of my photos from the trip. As always, comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
I have previously posted a question about whether ... (show quote)


Nice set Sally.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 07:34:30   #
rmm0605 Loc: Atlanta GA
 
Sally D wrote:
I have previously posted a question about whether the problem with soft focus was due to the lens or me. Several of you mentioned that the Canon 70-300mm is soft when taken at 300mm and wide open. I did several test shots and found that if I dropped it down a stop or two and stuck with 200mm or less, my photos looked sharp. But I was continually frustrated when I tried to stretch it's length so I finally stepped up and bought a 100-400mmL IS II and couldn't be happier! We recently returned from a trip to Colorado where I used it for my favorite subject, wild horses. I'm attaching a couple of my photos from the trip. As always, comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
I have previously posted a question about whether ... (show quote)


Great shots, Sally!

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 08:12:13   #
CanonTom Loc: Birmingham
 
Love the first shot! And are you comparing the 70-300 L USM or a non L version to the 100-400 II L?

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Jun 18, 2018 09:37:25   #
Sally D
 
CanonTom wrote:
Love the first shot! And are you comparing the 70-300 L USM or a non L version to the 100-400 II L?


I had the non-L 70-300 version. At about 1/4 the cost of my new lens, I know it is like comparing apples to oranges . . .but I didn’t know that when I was just starting out. Good glass comes at a price and I know that I’ve just barely entered that market.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 09:39:00   #
Bernie O' Loc: Bristol, CT
 
Great shots with a fantastic lens. Keep shooting Sally D.

Bernie O'

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 09:50:01   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
Comments are few but easy with shots like these. Beautiful, simply marvelous! Bravo Zulu!

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 10:03:17   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
These are beautiful. I have an old 75-300 and have always been satisfied with it. Your pics make me wonder if I should. . . .

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Jun 18, 2018 10:21:07   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Great shots, Sally D!
Sally D wrote:
I have previously posted a question about whether the problem with soft focus was due to the lens or me. Several of you mentioned that the Canon 70-300mm is soft when taken at 300mm and wide open. I did several test shots and found that if I dropped it down a stop or two and stuck with 200mm or less, my photos looked sharp. But I was continually frustrated when I tried to stretch it's length so I finally stepped up and bought a 100-400mmL IS II and couldn't be happier! We recently returned from a trip to Colorado where I used it for my favorite subject, wild horses. I'm attaching a couple of my photos from the trip. As always, comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
I have previously posted a question about whether ... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 10:34:38   #
ebbote Loc: Hockley, Texas
 
Great shots Sally.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 11:07:23   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
Very well done.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 11:48:26   #
bigwolf40 Loc: Effort, Pa.
 
Sally D wrote:
I have previously posted a question about whether the problem with soft focus was due to the lens or me. Several of you mentioned that the Canon 70-300mm is soft when taken at 300mm and wide open. I did several test shots and found that if I dropped it down a stop or two and stuck with 200mm or less, my photos looked sharp. But I was continually frustrated when I tried to stretch it's length so I finally stepped up and bought a 100-400mmL IS II and couldn't be happier! We recently returned from a trip to Colorado where I used it for my favorite subject, wild horses. I'm attaching a couple of my photos from the trip. As always, comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
I have previously posted a question about whether ... (show quote)


Every one of these photos are wonderful and the subject is great....Rich

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Jun 18, 2018 12:13:16   #
PeterDragon Loc: Harlan, KY - Kona, HI - Phoenix, AZ
 
I think your questions have been answered. The only suggestion I have is, put all of them in frames. Simply beautiful.

Jim

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 12:18:26   #
Sally D
 
I so appreciate all of the extremely kind responses to my post. I am a new photographer . . . just over a year now and I really hated to part with the $$$ but I am so glad I did. I failed to mention when I posted that with the exception of the first picture, the others were very heavily cropped.
Thanks again.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 13:02:10   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
#1 is a show stopper! Thanks so much for sharing.

Reply
Jun 18, 2018 14:58:27   #
iDoc Loc: Knoxville,Tennessee
 
Super shots. #1 is a real beaut!

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.