Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Links and Resources
Fast Glass?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 9, 2018 19:54:46   #
BebuLamar
 
ken_stern wrote:
Have you considered the value of Time --- reduce the ISO - put the camera on a tripod & take a longer exposure -- Then compare your photos -- high ISO vs low/Lower ISO --- In either case you don't need to buy Fast Glass


I always do as I use film quite often and with film with ISO of 400 or so is too grainny for my taste. Most of my subjects can certainly photographed with a tripod and low ISO and slow lens but often they are where tripod is either prohibited, would bother other people or simply too much of a pain to bring it with me.

Reply
Jun 9, 2018 20:13:20   #
le boecere
 
Bultaco wrote:


I really like this article. Very informative. Thank you for posting it.

Reply
Jun 9, 2018 20:30:33   #
Photocraig
 
ken_stern wrote:
Why I like fast glass -----
Reminds me of an old automotive term --- There is no replacement for displacement


Or the Combat Aviator's favorite: "You can't have too much Altitude, Fuel or Ammunition."

Thanks for the GAS pump, Steve!
C

Reply
 
 
Jun 10, 2018 09:04:28   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
"Thus, for portrait work, an 85mm f/1.8 Nikkor is preferable."

Bob, an 85mm f1.8 lens is a great lens for portraits but a 100mm or a 135mm is even better. I am not a fan of using portrait lenses wide open. In the studio surely it is not needed and outdoors with careful placing of the subject any of these lenses will blur the background without resorting to the widest aperture. With the lens closer to the subject the background at f5.6 is going to be blurred, assuming the background is not too close to the subject, more so with a camera with a so called "full frame" sensor. The advantage of the f5.6 opening is that it will allow a sharper image and will bring better texture on the skin if that is preferable.
I know that many photographers love to shoot portraits with the lens wide open but there are many others that do not. If the photographer knows what he is doing blurring the background at other apertures should not be an issue regardless of the size of the sensor.

Reply
Jun 10, 2018 15:23:56   #
drmike99 Loc: Fairfield Connecticut
 
Bultaco wrote:


I did also. Thanks for the link.

Reply
Jun 10, 2018 19:28:44   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
In found it interesting as I shot wildlife and the only reason I posted it. The 600mm F4 require high ISOs to get the shot and not as a crutch, I have yet had a Moose, Bear, Elk ect pose or wait for good light. So many on this site are blinded by what they shoot and don't consider how many subjects are out there.

Reply
Jun 10, 2018 20:10:06   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
Bultaco wrote:
In found it interesting as I shot wildlife and the only reason I posted it. The 600mm F4 require high ISOs to get the shot and not as a crutch, I have yet had a Moose, Bear, Elk ect pose or wait for good light. So many on this site are blinded by what they shoot and don't consider how many subjects are out there.




What's right for you is not necessarily right for me, and vice versa....

Andy

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Links and Resources
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.