Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
2001: A Space Odyssey- Iconic Photographic Moments
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
May 30, 2018 10:04:04   #
hpucker99 Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
tonybear wrote:
2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of Stanley Kubrick's iconic movie “2001: A Space Odyssey”.
That film ranks as one of the all time great science fiction films of all time, but it's making is not known very well, except for the most ardent of film-goers. All that unknown knowledge about the making of this amazing movie is brought to light in author Michael Benson's new book “Space Odyssey”- Stanley Kubrick, Arthur C Clarke, and the Making of a Masterpiece”.
Throughout the film, the movie's HAL 9000 computer is symbolized by its mysteriously ominous all-seeing eye, a big red-domed lens. Some HH'ers might recognize this as a Nikon 8mm fish-eye lens, that was lit from behind- as Benson's incredible book explains. Other special effects in the film were state of the art for its day- mostly done through optical technology, as there was no computer generated imagery technology available at that time.
While the film “2001: A Space Odyssey” is 50 years old, the story it tells, which is mostly visual, still holds up, despite it's often mysterious and baffling ending. Its currently available on DVD and BluRay. The Blu-Ray version has many supplementary documentary videos about the making of the film, and serves to provide the reader with additional fascinating insight into the remarkable film. And Benson's new book reveals hitherto unknown background information how Kubrick's amazing production team brought the film to fruition. It's well worth a read.
2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of Stanley Kubrick... (show quote)


I recently bought this book, it is a great read on the background and personalities that made "2001".

Reply
May 30, 2018 10:07:03   #
hpucker99 Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
TriX wrote:
A SciFi classic, and the special effects are remarkable for the time (with no computer assistance). Kubrick’s masterpiece. It is slow-paced, but so are many other great movies. It helps to read Arthur C. Clark’s book if you want to understand the ending. I grew up reading the great SciFi writers - Robert Heinlein, Arthur C. Clarke, Jack Vance, Ray Bradbury, and the good doctor Asimov, H.P. Lovecraft, Fredrick Pohl, and Clifford Simak just to name a few...


Grew up reading the same authors and still continue to read them. I plan to read all of Asimov's Robot/Foundation series this summer. I have been reading the collected short stories from Arthur C. Clarke, but stopped since I still remember them and the endings from 40+ years ago.

Reply
May 30, 2018 10:26:27   #
Burtzy Loc: Bronx N.Y. & Simi Valley, CA
 
hpucker99 wrote:
Grew up reading the same authors and still continue to read them. I plan to read all of Asimov's Robot/Foundation series this summer. I have been reading the collected short stories from Arthur C. Clarke, but stopped since I still remember them and the endings from 40+ years ago.
I read the entire Foundation and Robot series years ago and was fascinated by how Asimov managed to steer them to each other and ultimately make them one and the same. Brilliant.

Reply
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
May 30, 2018 10:47:11   #
htbrown Loc: San Francisco Bay Area
 
I went to see this one when it came out - three times. I still love it. I recently re-watched it, and noted several things:

- it is slow, by modern standards. When the first Indiana Jones movie came out, both my wife and I were dizzied by its breakneck pace. No all movies are that way, and when we saw it again recently, it didn't seem too fast. So tastes and styles change.

- that slow pace is deliberate, emphasizing the tediousness that a long space voyage would undoubtedly incur.

- it provides an interesting look at the social dynamics of the 1960s. Women, for the most part, are in subservient roles such as (wo)manning a kiosk or serving passengers on the way to the moon. The interactions between the men, both in the meeting on the moon and when they are eating sandwiches while traveling to the obelisk, remind me very much of men of my father's generation. It's just what you'd expect for the 60s, but by the time we actually can do all the movie portrays, things will inevitably be different.

Reply
May 30, 2018 10:59:04   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
Pick up your phone right now, and ask Siri or Gertie Google to "Open the pod bay doors".

Sersly...

You will get some pretty good answers. My favorite from Siri is "But then the cat will get out".


Andy

Reply
May 30, 2018 11:01:36   #
hpucker99 Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
htbrown wrote:
I went to see this one when it came out - three times. I still love it. I recently re-watched it, and noted several things:

- it is slow, by modern standards. When the first Indiana Jones movie came out, both my wife and I were dizzied by its breakneck pace. No all movies are that way, and when we saw it again recently, it didn't seem too fast. So tastes and styles change.

- that slow pace is deliberate, emphasizing the tediousness that a long space voyage would undoubtedly incur.

- it provides an interesting look at the social dynamics of the 1960s. Women, for the most part, are in subservient roles such as (wo)manning a kiosk or serving passengers on the way to the moon. The interactions between the men, both in the meeting on the moon and when they are eating sandwiches while traveling to the obelisk, remind me very much of men of my father's generation. It's just what you'd expect for the 60s, but by the time we actually can do all the movie portrays, things will inevitably be different.
I went to see this one when it came out - three ti... (show quote)


When the movie came out, many people apparently walked out of the showings. The response to 2001 seems to be bimodal; one either hated it or loved it. I saw it with my brother in 1968, he didn't like it, I walked out of the theater stunned. I read an article lately, the director Chris Nolan is overseeing a release of "2001". He was watching the film and noticed that in the scene where HAL9000 is being lobotomized, the astronaut is doing it out of anger, not just for his own safety.

Reply
May 30, 2018 11:05:09   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
hpucker99 wrote:
When the movie came out, many people apparently walked out of the showings. The response to 2001 seems to be bimodal; one either hated it or loved it. I saw it with my brother in 1968, he didn't like it, I walked out of the theater stunned. I read an article lately, the director Chris Nolan is overseeing a release of "2001". He was watching the film and noticed that in the scene where HAL9000 is being lobotomized, the astronaut is doing it out of anger, not just for his own safety.


Yes! I noticed that as well. One of the multiple recurring themes is the interplay between emotional and rational decision making. I've watched it dozens of times and almost always find some new subtlety or easter egg. You are right about the love / hate reaction - I know many of the latter, including my wife. But I think it's one of the most brilliant films of my lifetime and has aged very well (although the tech guys missed on a few predictions - I'm still looking for those video phone booths - must be coming soon to an airport near me).


Andy

Reply
 
 
May 30, 2018 13:18:05   #
Paladin48 Loc: Orlando
 
Longshadow wrote:

Loved that movie!
I have Hal announce "There is a message for you." when I get new mail on my computer.


Where did you find that sound bite?!? That would be a great one to have.

Reply
May 30, 2018 14:35:03   #
jdedmonds
 
tonybear wrote:
2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of Stanley Kubrick's iconic movie “2001: A Space Odyssey”.
That film ranks as one of the all time great science fiction films of all time, but it's making is not known very well, except for the most ardent of film-goers. All that unknown knowledge about the making of this amazing movie is brought to light in author Michael Benson's new book “Space Odyssey”- Stanley Kubrick, Arthur C Clarke, and the Making of a Masterpiece”.
Throughout the film, the movie's HAL 9000 computer is symbolized by its mysteriously ominous all-seeing eye, a big red-domed lens. Some HH'ers might recognize this as a Nikon 8mm fish-eye lens, that was lit from behind- as Benson's incredible book explains. Other special effects in the film were state of the art for its day- mostly done through optical technology, as there was no computer generated imagery technology available at that time.
While the film “2001: A Space Odyssey” is 50 years old, the story it tells, which is mostly visual, still holds up, despite it's often mysterious and baffling ending. Its currently available on DVD and BluRay. The Blu-Ray version has many supplementary documentary videos about the making of the film, and serves to provide the reader with additional fascinating insight into the remarkable film. And Benson's new book reveals hitherto unknown background information how Kubrick's amazing production team brought the film to fruition. It's well worth a read.
2018 marks the 50th Anniversary of Stanley Kubrick... (show quote)


Ever notice that HAL are the three letters immediately preceding IBM?

Reply
May 30, 2018 14:48:36   #
n3eg Loc: West coast USA
 
Keldon wrote:
I'm with Bebelamar, I found the movie to be quite boring. Long, long, long special effects shots that never seemed to end and didn't do anything for the movie.

I fell asleep in the movie theater when I was 9. I tried to watch it again at age 39 and also fell asleep. I'm not watching it again at age 69 because I might not wake up.

Reply
May 30, 2018 15:22:42   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
Keldon wrote:
I'm with Bebelamar, I found the movie to be quite boring. Long, long, long special effects shots that never seemed to end and didn't do anything for the movie.


That's why they have horse races!

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
May 30, 2018 15:37:56   #
pendennis
 
jdedmonds wrote:
Ever notice that HAL are the three letters immediately preceding IBM?


There was always speculation that Arthur C. Clark and Stanley Kubric had something to do with the HAL/IBM naming. Both have always stated that there was no IBM connection to the naming of HAL.

HAL = Heuristically programmed ALgorithmic computer

Reply
May 30, 2018 15:56:04   #
Hyperhad Loc: Thunder Bay, Canada
 
2001 is at the top of my top ten best films of all time. My favourite Director, Stanley Kubrick, was eccentric, a perfectionist, a genius. Just look at the composition of each scene of the film. Each one is thoroughly thought out and planned. Kubrick's visual concept of what outer space would look like, directional lighting, and how people and spacecraft would react when moving, was all far ahead of its time. Remember, in 1968 the US had not yet gone to the moon. It has been said by some who have been in space, that Kubrick's imagining of what it is like was very accurate. Compare 2001 to "Mission Mars 1967", or "The Astro-Zombies 1968". Yes, these films were made around the same as 2001.
Kubrick's use of classical music to score space flight was genius, and never before done. He used models for his spacecraft. He sometimes placed cameras inside the models, looking out a viewport, as the model approached another object, just to allow for proper "point-of-view" perspective. Clark was a genius in his own right, of course. His short story, "The Sentinel", was the basis upon which 2001 was based. He and Kubrick made for a great match, with this film as a result. Watch "Barry Lyndon" for more great, well-composed scenes. "The Shining" is similarly well-done.
The film is not a fast-paced action story. It is the story of alien intervention in the evolution of human beings. The ending of the film shows the "Star Child", the next step in our evolution. This scene links to the moment near the beginning of the film when the apes? touch the obelisk, thereby gaining the knowledge to use weapons. That knowledge begins our evolution. I really love the scene when the bone, the ultimate weapon of the time, is thrown up into the air, spinning slowly. As the bone slows, we cut to a slowly spinning nuclear platform, the ultimate weapon of (then) modern times. When an obelisk is again discovered, buried on the Moon, one of the astronauts touches it. A loud signal is sent off, signalling the human beings are ready for the "next step". Love it!

Reply
May 30, 2018 16:55:12   #
BBurns Loc: South Bay, California
 
Working in the aerospace industry, I had the pleasure of meeting Arthur Clarke at seminars on a number of occasions. Fascinating mind.

In 1984 I saw the sequel, 2010 in Hollywood at a good theater.
On the way home I commented that it would be great to see the original 2001 while this latest film was fresh in our mind.
As we drove east on Sunset Blvd. we passed the Cinerama Dome, just as they were changing the marquee to 2001.
We came back the next evening to see it. Still a classic film.

Now, will they ever make a film of Clarke's book, 2061 ??

Reply
May 30, 2018 16:55:25   #
dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida
 
Paladin48 wrote:
Where did you find that sound bite?!? That would be a great one to have.

Some of Hal's wave file are in my reference on page 1 along with installation directions.

HAL 9000: "There is a message for you." is in the group of Hal Voice files.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.